News: 1606389674

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Spending Review: We spy a stray £60m – is that all you can spare to help 5G market recover from UK kicking out Huawei?

(2020/11/26)


Among the economic doom and gloom of the UK's Autumn Spending Review, Chancellor of the Exchequer Rishi Sunak inadvertently revealed the sop UK.gov plans to throw to telcos after sacking Huawei from the UK's 5G rollout at the behest of an orange one-term president of the US.

Taxpayers are set to provide £60m to help "diversify" the market away from the Chinese supplier, one of only a handful of firms capable of supporting the 5G infrastructure rollout in the UK.

How far a £60m subsidy will go to changing this dynamic is questionable.

BT has previously said it allocated a £500m budget in early January to replace existing [1]Huawei 5G RAN components . Vodafone, meanwhile, has said it would pay €200m to replace Huawei kit already [2]installed across Europe .

Oliver Dowden MP, the Secretary of State for the Department of Culture, Media and Sport, has [3]said the requirement to strip UK networks of existing Huawei-made kit, would cause a "cumulative delay of two to three" years and potential costs of up to £2bn.

The Spending Review document promises "over £260m for transformative digital infrastructure programmes, including the Shared Rural Network for 4G coverage, Local Full Fibre Networks, and the 5G Diversification and Testbeds and Trials Programmes."

Of this money, the government said it was committing "over £200m UK-wide" to the same list of projects, but omitted the 5G diversification programme, leading The Reg to conclude that £60m will be set aside for the nex generation mobile network kerfuffle.

The programme kicked off in September, and is designed to help diversify the UK's telecoms supply chain and reduce the exposure to so-called "high-risk vendors" such as Huawei. The group leading the strategy [4]is set to be chaired by former BT CEO Lord Ian Livingston and will bring together experts from industry and academia.

In July, [5]the government announced that it would outlaw the purchase of Huawei equipment for buildouts of carriers' 5G networks by the end of this year, and from 2027 the country's mobile networks must altogether eradicate the Chinese vendor's kit from their 5G infrastructure.

The lion's share of the 5G hardware market is held by Ericsson, Nokia, and Huawei, with Samsung, Cisco, and ZTE picking at the leftovers.

The chancellor's statement to the House of Commons was accompanied by the usual fiscal sleight of hand and political point-scoring ping-pong. UK GDP will contract 11.3 per cent this year – the biggest drop in more than 300 years – while borrowing is expected to reach £394bn

[6]PDF

for the current fiscal year.

Broadly speaking...

Elsewhere, broadband ambition had also been watered down. The chancellor's statement included £1.2bn to subsidise the rollout of gigabit-capable broadband to cover the first four years of the government's [7]already-announced £5bn commitment to support rollout to the hardest-to-reach areas of the UK, which had been committed by 2025.

And, where the government had said it would introduce gigabit-speed broadband to every home in Britain, a new infrastructure strategy

[8]PDF

launched alongside the Spending Review now says: "The government is working with industry to target a minimum of 85 per cent gigabit capable coverage by 2025, but will seek to accelerate roll-out further to get as close to 100 per cent as possible."

The strategy doc went on to point out that the "total level of investment required to upgrade the nation's broadband networks to be gigabit-capable speeds is in the region of £30bn; the vast majority of this is expected to come from the private sector."

Andrew Glover, ISPA Chair, said the scaling back of the government's ambitions is a "blow to rural communities".

“This will not stop providers from continuing to press ahead with their commercial rollout plans, but it puts an even greater emphasis on tackling the regulatory and practical barriers that make rollout more difficult than it should be.

"As our experiences over 2020 have proved, our broadband infrastructure is fundamental to propping up the UK’s economy in periods of lockdown, so we urge the Government to ensure that this policy pivot does not lead to longer term digital exclusion of those in harder to reach areas."

In terms of science funding, the chancellor, [9]son-in-law of InfoSys co-founder Nagavara Ramarao Narayana Murthy, also announced a £17m fund for 2021-22 to "establish a new unit and fund that will focus on the last mile of innovation to help ensure that public sector knowledge assets (R&D, intellectual property and other intangible assets) translate into new high-tech jobs, businesses and economic growth."

A drive to "build new science capability" would get £450m in 2021-22 including £350m to UK Research and Innovation, a non-departmental public body. Like a Russian doll within that, the first £50m was announced towards an £800m investment in high-risk, high-payoff research, the much-vaunted [10]ARPA-like pet project of Dominic Cummings, the former Number 10 advisor and architect of Brexit who departed from the government earlier in November. ®

Get our [11]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/29/vodafone_bt_execs_huawei/

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2020/02/05/vodafone_to_strip_huawei_gear_from_its_network/

[3] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/14/huawei_ban_uk/

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/24/uk_telecoms_diversification_task_force/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/14/huawei_ban_uk/

[6] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938054/SR20_print.pdf

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2020/03/11/uk_budget_2020_tech/

[8] https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/938049/NIS_final_web_single_page.pdf

[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rishi_Sunak

[10] https://www.theregister.com/2020/03/11/uk_budget_2020_tech/

[11] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

Doctor Syntax

"We'd have liked to have given you more but Covid...."

Expect more of this in years to come. Every bad effect of dubious govt. policy will be blamed on Covid.

Remember the Brexit bus?

Snorlax

The Brexit bus claimed that £350 million per week was being sent to Europe for the privilege of EU membership.

Presumably UK.gov stopped making these payments after the referendum? Why not spend some of that money on corporate welfare payments?

Or better yet, spend the money on citizens’ welfare rather than propping up tax-dodging multinational phone companies...

Re: Remember the Brexit bus?

EvilDrSmith

>Presumably UK.gov stopped making these payments after the referendum

Nope.

Payments would have continued until the UK left the EU (i.e. the start of this year) as a minimum.

I suspect the UK has continued to pay close to the full amount during the transition period too, but can't be bothered to check: though I think the monies paid do count towards the total due under the withdrawal agreement

The UK will then continue to pay a proportion of the previous amount, in accordance with the terms of the withdrawal agreement.

The last I remember, total payments under the withdrawal agreement were estimated at around £35 billion, the bulk of which I think get paid in the next couple of years.

So regardless how much money you think the UK sent to the EU, it's not going to significantly reduce for a couple of years

But what about 2025?

steamnut

In 2015, BT announced that they will be switching off the PSTN and ISDN in 2025. After that time we will all be using some form of VOIP. The roll-out of fibre has to be completed by that date else how will end users make phone calls? I live in a very rural area and have FTTC. But, even that is temporary as it used the analogue lines for the last mile.

Re: But what about 2025?

IGotOut

You don't need fibre to the home for VoIP.

You just need an ATA (Analogue Telephone Adapter).

You DO however need power near the phone socket.

Disgusted Of Tunbridge Wells

> sacking Huawei from the UK's 5G rollout at the behest of an orange one-term president of the US.

What a tedious line to take. Bring back El Reg of a few years ago.

Paris because she's (probably) just as disappointed as I am

re: tedious

Oh Homer

Nope, seems spot on to me.

The UK 5g infrastructure has been fscked because of completely unsubstantiated hysteria peddled by a pathological liar.

The question is, will Boris now have the balls to admit he never really wanted to do this in the first place, now that he no longer has to appease the Orange loser?

Re: re: tedious

ARGO

Doubt it. He was appeasing his backbenchers more than the orange one. Unfortunately Tugendhat and Duncan-Smith are still around and still believe themselves to be experts on network technology.

Re: re: tedious

Yet Another Anonymous coward

So long as the switch is to completely British designed and built 5G I'm sure the Tory back benchers will be happy

Lucky escape here...

Anonymous Coward

Rural location and wasn't expecting to get fibre early on, if at all.

Openreach were in the manholes last week installing fibre - turns out we are in a rural trial area.

I've not pledged my government voucher (for £1,500) though as the T&C's say you have to switch within two months of "go live" or else they may come after me for the £1,500 as it won't pay out. Trouble is, I'm in a contract until middle of next year and would have to pay early termination fees. A pity, as I would be happy for them to get the cash for deploying out here where we'll probably never get anything else.

What happened to 5G security being important?

Anonymous Coward

It's only important if someone else is paying?

Or there was never a security issue in the first place?

(I know which one of those I'd bet on)

Re: What happened to 5G security being important?

Charlie Clark

5G has the same level of security as 4G, which is probably quite a bit above what most broadband has. All US network companies put backdoors in their kit when the NSA asks them to. But, so far, no one has been able to prove that Huawei does for the Chinese and they provide access to their kit and the source code.

Thou hast seen nothing yet.
-- Miguel de Cervantes