When sci-fact beats sci-fi: Echoes of exploding stars' final cries may be trapped in the rings of trees on Earth
- Reference: 1605162428
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/11/12/tree_ring_supernova/
- Source link:
Robert Brakenridge, a geoscientist at the University of Colorado Boulder’s Institute of Arctic and Alpine Research, reckons stars exploding relatively close to Earth may have left fingerprints in our forests and jungles, which could be used to build a timeline of epic eruptions.
The trick, we're told, is to pay close attention to the amount of carbon-14 found inside the circular layers of trunk that form as trees grow. Carbon-14, aka radiocarbon, is produced in Earth's atmosphere when neutrons, smashed off atoms by incoming cosmic rays, merge with nitrogen. Some of that carbon isotope is absorbed into the trees as they grow, the quantity of which can be measured.
You can see where this is going: higher-than-expected levels of carbon-14 in a tree ring may point to an increase in radiation caused by exploding faraway stars, which kick out extreme levels of cosmic rays, causing a surge in radiocarbon that's absorbed by the plants. Brakenridge thus reckons spikes in radiocarbon detected in tree rings may have been created when the Earth was showered with more cosmic rays than usual. These radiation-heavy periods mark when massive old stars erupted nearby as supernovas, he argued.
This theory has been mulled before: for example, [1]in 2005 , a team in Japan investigated the effect of supernova on radiocarbon levels in trees. They found "no evidence" linking the two, and suggested any variation in the isotope is due to standard solar rays rather than dramatic explosions. Brakenridge thinks the scientific world should take a look again.
“We’re seeing terrestrial events that are begging for an explanation,” he [2]said on Wednesday. “There are really only two possibilities: a solar flare or a supernova. I think the supernova hypothesis has been dismissed too quickly.”
I think the supernova hypothesis has been dismissed too quickly
Crucially, he said he can trace four radiocarbon increases, detailed in a paper [3]published last week in the International Journal of Astrobiology, to four separate supernovas. The oldest explosion dates back more than 13,000 years when a giant star in the Vela constellation located 815 light-years away burst, and seemingly ramped the level of carbon-14 on Earth by three per cent.
“These are small radiocarbon isotope anomalies, peaks in concentration, in tree rings at particular years as dated by tree-ring scientists,” Brakenridge told The Register . “Tree rings in many trees are annual, so we can reliably identify to the year how old the ring is.”
In other words, the carbon-14 spikes in trees could pinpoint the date a sun detonated more accurately than studying the heavens, assuming you can get an old-enough sample.
“Astronomers can only approximately date the times of the supernovas from their remnant nebula," Brakenridge said. "If a secure connection of a specific event to a recorded carbon-14 anomaly [can be pinpointed], the energy of the supernova, and its actual age, can be tightly constrained. Supernova energies vary widely: so this helps get at the basic physics of the explosion."
The study's sample size of four is small, and so you may not want to jump to conclusions, though Brakenridge is hopeful the dating technique can be used in the future. “My paper only starts this process, it proposes strong candidates for specific known supernova events and known carbon-14 anomalies,” he told us. ®
Get our [4]Tech Resources
[1] http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/2005ICRC....2..357M/B000357.000.html
[2] https://www.colorado.edu/today/2020/11/11/tree-rings-may-hold-clues-impacts-distant-supernovas-earth
[3] https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/international-journal-of-astrobiology/article/solar-system-exposure-to-supernova-radiation/93A83A960E20D33182A720A08D13F40C
[4] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Sounds plausible
Now all we have to do is find a 13000 year old tree.
That might be a tad difficult.
Re: Sounds plausible
Yggdrasil might be a contender. But I think the Brazilians want to chop it down for farmland.
Re: Sounds plausible
@Pascal Monett
We find old tree remains e.g. areas once forest that were inundated by sea and found under sea sediments.
Problem with ancient tree samples is knowing age - there's various dating erasures that give an estimate, but accurate tree dating to a given year means stitching together tree ring history over time (using trees with overlapping rings means you get further and further back) - relies on accurately matching up and, sample size is an issue.
Re: a 13000 year old tree.
Apparently the oldest known Bristlecone Pine has made it to about 4800 years, which isn't a bad run.
Re: Sounds plausible
According to the wikipedia article on dendrochronology:
"Currently, the maximum span for fully anchored chronology is a little over 11,000 years B.P. "
"For the period back to 12,400 B.P., the radiocarbon dates are calibrated against dendrochronological dates."
(where B.P. refers to the number of years before the 1st of January 1950.)
So there is certainly data back almost that far. As to where it's from, I imagine bog-oaks and other preserved timbers provide a lot of the data.
Mentioning the sample size is kind of irrelevant, as this technique will only ever be used for past events. A new event will allow us to confirm that there is an increase in Carbon-14, but we wouldn't need to be looking at tree rings to date that event.
So only existing data about past events will be available, so I can't see the sample size getting (much) bigger.