News: 1600916112

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

TikTok seeks injunction to halt Trump ban, claims it would break America's own First and Fifth Amendments

(2020/09/24)


TikTok has asked the courts for a preliminary injunction that would prevent the the Trump administration from banning the video-sharing app in America this weekend.

In its [1]filing [PDF] on Wednesday, Tiktok said it had “made extraordinary efforts to try to satisfy the government’s ever-shifting demands and purported national security concerns.” Any ban would break the [2]First and [3]Fifth Amendments of the United States Constitution, it claimed, as well as multiple other laws. Said amendments, broadly speaking, cover freedom of speech and right to assemble and petition the government; and the right to due process, respectively.

The request was filed in a Washington DC district court, and comes in response to a proposed ban on the app that was due to come into effect [4]on Sunday but was extended by a week as President Trump considered a plan to [5]carve off part of TikTok and get Oracle and Walmart involved.

The filing also follows a similar and [6]successful injunction bid by another Chinese-owned app – WeChat – which Trump had also threatened to ban under the pretext that it was a national security risk.

TikTok proposes coalition with other social apps to curb harmful content [7]READ MORE

TikTok's move is just the latest in a [8]head-spinning month of moves in which TikTok’s owner, Chinese outfit ByteDance, has tried to mollify the President by drawing up a complex deal that would see it separate off its global, non-China business, headquarter it in the US, sell 20 per cent of itself to Oracle and Walmart, and then go public within a year, putting its shares into the hands of most American investors. Oracle would also provide a cloud platform for the popular app.

All of that was proposed after the President decided TikTok represented a national security threat and gave it a month to come up with a plan to satisfy him that it wasn’t. But even after TikTok’s proposal appeared to get the green light from the US Treasury, and after President Trump said he had approved it on Saturday, he then backtracked during a phone-in to a morning TV chat show and suggested he wouldn’t in fact approve it.

Confused old man

The President seemingly didn’t understand the basic terms of the deal and also confused a PR line about billions in future tax dollars arising from the agreement going to the Treasury and an unrelated educational program, prompting TikTok to clarify the situation. Everything has gone quiet since.

As such, it’s fair to say TikTok is not confident the deal will get approved by the weekend, if at all, and so has filed to preemptively prevent the blockade, potentially bringing everything back to square one.

There’s also the fact that earlier today, China Daily, which is the English-language newspaper of the Chinese government, [9]called the whole deal “dirty and unfair and based on bullying and extortion.”

“There is simply no genuine emergency here that would justify the government’s precipitous actions,” TikTok said in its filing. “And there is no plausible reason to insist the prohibitions be enforced immediately." ®

Get our [10]Tech Resources



[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/09/24/tiktok.pdf

[2] https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/first_amendment

[3] https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/fifth_amendment

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/18/tiktok_wechat_download_ban_planned/

[5] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/21/tiktok_oracle_walmart/

[6] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/20/wechat_injunction/

[7] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/23/tiktok_proposes_content_cleansing_coalition/

[8] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/21/tiktok_oracle_walmart/

[9] https://global.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202009/23/WS5f6a2445a31024ad0ba7b1c9.html

[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

Sue

Snake

The only thing the GOP understands is MONEY. Make them spend it in court.

Re: Sue

Anonymous Coward

The problem with that is that it will ultimately be We The People that end up paying for all the legal wrangling, either by having our tax dollars siphoned off, by paying higher prices for Chinese made products, or both.

The politicians don't give two shakes of a OHSG temper tantrum what damage it does to the rest of the nation as long as it at least tries to make their glorious leader think he's on top. He is, he's at the very top, of an epic pile of shit of his own making. He's certainly MAGA - we're number one... in the world death toll of C19 victims & daily new cases. Way to go Trump, way to make the place the shittiest "first world" nation on Earth!

Due process and equality before the law

Schultz

You might ask: "which law?" and "what process?". And that, I guess, is the correct answer.

Re: Due process and equality before the law

Anonymous Coward

As mentioned in another article the Chinese will have a perfectly legit & *legal* excuse to return the favor by doing exactly the same bullshit to any American company operating in China.

How well do you think a corp like Apple would accept having their assets seized, their IP stolen, & the business essentially nationalized out from under them?

And China's global reply to the world to do exactly the same thing to all American corps operating in those countries.

How well do you think Trump's legacy will be remembered if he winds up being the cause of American business' overseas all being stripped, assets forfeit, IP swiped, & their supposedly good names turned into shit?

Son, someday a man is going to walk up to you with a deck of cards on which
the seal is not yet broken. And he is going to offer to bet you that he can
make the Ace of Spades jump out of the deck and squirt cider in your ears.
But son, do not bet this man, for you will end up with a ear full of cider.
-- Sky Masterson's Father