News: 1599211630

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

'We're not claiming to replace humans,' says Google, but we want to be 'close enough' that you can't tell it's a bot talking

(2020/09/04)


Google has teased new bot technology aimed mainly at contact centres as part of its Cloud AI week in the seemingly unending Cloud Next OnAir videofest.

This includes the ability to train text-to-speech on a human voice so that you could create recordings that sound as if a specific person spoke them – a technology with obvious potential for abuse, though the company said all customers requesting this will be subject to ethical review.

Anthony Passemard, head of product for conversational AI, [1]spoke at the virtual event on "Contact Center AI (CCAI) State of the union". He claimed that 31 per cent of CIOs have adopted "conversational AI platforms", which is itself a rise of 50 per cent year-on-year.

He also maintained that "by 2023, customers will prefer to use speech interfaces to initiate 70 per cent of self-service customer interactions, rising from 40 per cent of in 2019", and that 40 per cent of contact centre interactions will be "fully automated by using AI, machine learning and self-service", up from 25 per cent in 2018. The figures quoted were from Gartner.

[2]

Contact Center AI is based on parsing voice input, bot-driven conversations, AI-driven assistance for human agents, and analytics after the event

The enthusiasm of companies to pay fewer human agents in call centres is understandable, though the extent to which their customers would welcome this is less clear. Actions like, for example, paying a bill are easy to automate, though most people use the web for this, and old-school number menus ("Press 1 for this, 2 for that") work equally well, or badly, in many cases. More gnarly problems are rarely solved via automated interaction, though Google argued that its technology can perform useful triage as well as guiding human agents after the call has been transferred.

CCAI is composed of three Google products. [3]DialogFlow is a developer tool for building conversational AI applications, and at Cloud Next Passemard introduced DialogFlow CX, currently in beta, which he called "the next evolution" of the service. General availability is expected in a few months. New features in DialogFlow CX include a revamped user interface with a visual flow builder, up to 20,000 intents per agent, native support for sentiment (how angry you are), and for Custom Voice, these text-to-speech voices that customers themselves train. DialogFlow CX also supports a DevOps pipeline with features including A/B testing of bots and intents.

[4]

Custom Voice lets customers make text to speech sound like a specific person after just 30 minutes of training

"Intents" are the pre-defined actions that the AI parses from voice input, such as "I'd like to pay my bill" or perhaps "why have I been charged twice?"

Google's speech-to-text technology is used by its Assistant and Google Home services as well as CCIA so it is an area of significant investment. The company's presentation claimed a vocabulary 10 times the size of the Oxford English Dictionary, 120 languages, and real-time text conversion with after-the-fact correction based on context.

Just introduced is Speech-to-Text On-Prem, which runs in a company's data centre via Anthos, Google's hybrid cloud platform. Using Anthos, customers can have the data and processing remain on-premises, while still managing it from a cloud console, perhaps satisfying some regulatory requirements.

Agent Assist is AI-driven assistance for human agents (computer says no?) and provides them with a live transcription of all calls (following, no doubt, the standard warning that "this call may be recorded"), as well as searching for suitable knowledgebase articles or proposing related products for a sales pitch. The news here is that Google now offers Agent Assist for chat as well as voice, meaning the live chat option you now find on many customer support sites.

Passemard also introduced the alpha of CCIA Insights, a service for mining the data from calls so that managers or executives can analyse what people are calling about and the quality of their experience. The AI will analyse sentiment, not relying solely on the inevitable plea for customers to rate the service at the end of a call. The idea is that companies can find the worst cases and follow them up.

Text to speech is another key part of the service. It is easy to make an electronic voice read text, but not so easy to make it sound convincingly human, and this is where it is evolving. There are now 223 preset voices and 92 [5]WaveNet voices, a premium service promising "human-like emphasis and inflection on syllables, phonemes and words". WaveNet voices are also used by Google Assistant.

The newly introduced Custom Voice allows customers to use a "voice actor" to train a bot to speak like the actor. Passemard demonstrated this capability by playing a recording of an actor, and then a digital voice, based apparently on just 30 minutes of recordings of the actor's voice, which sounded plausibly similar.

The company is aware, said Passemard, that people should "not be using the voice of an actor to do things that are not ethical". The technology, he said, "is available for any customer, following an ethics review". In an era of disinformation there is abundant potential for misuse, when applied for example to politics or social media manipulation, but Google's criteria for ethical use and how it will prevent misuse was not stated. That said, the ability to manipulate audio is nothing new and Custom Voice only makes this easier.

"We're not claiming we're going to be able to replace humans," said Passemard. "That's not the case. But we want to be close enough that we advise our customers to let people know they are talking to a bot, and not a human agent." ®

Get our [6]Tech Resources



[1] https://cloud.withgoogle.com/next/sf/sessions?session=AI114#cloud-ai

[2] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/09/03/flow.png

[3] https://cloud.google.com/dialogflow/

[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/09/03/customspeech.png

[5] https://deepmind.com/blog/article/wavenet-generative-model-raw-audio

[6] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

iron

All very fancy sounding but how does it handle a Geordie accent or Brum or Glesga?

It's all fun and games until someone has an accent.

Version 1.0

If you talk back at a bot then this gives it the ability to get your accent and then start calling your friends.

Dudley legends

trashsilo

During the war, a British General visited an Army Hospital of the South Staffordshire Regiment. Sensing a doom and gloom atmosphere he tried to rally the men by asking :

"Now you men didn't come here to die did you?"

To which Aynuk and Ayli replied

"Na sur, way booth coomd ere yesterdie."

Bot test

Anonymous Coward

Sadly I had a human fail the ‘name a stripey horse if you are not a bot’ test.

Re: Bot test

Stumpy

I called mine 'Bert'

Version 1.0

We get phone calls at work and home continually, they sound just like a real person, their first words are, "Do not hang up the phone this is an importan"- at that point I hang up on them every time. So I expect this new technology will become widespread to promote insurance and credit card fraud - this is a big market, you can see why Google is interested.

we're not claiming we're going to be able to replace humans

Anonymous Coward

nosir, we're simply working hard to make this happen. Not because we're anti-human, but because of money, nothing personal!

Oh, the irony

RyokuMas

"... all customers requesting this will be subject to ethical review..."

Google wants an ethical review of its customers...

Stop the world - I want to get off.

Re: Oh, the irony

Simon Ward

Well, they have to train Sundar Pichai's neural network somehow ...

Facebook are probably doing something similar in a vain attempt to make the Zuckerborg pass for human.

Garbage in garbage out

Andy Non

I'm not convinced that talking bots will be much better than text/chat bots are at present, probably just more infuriating to deal with when you ask something that is not in its database. At least human script jockeys pass you on to a supervisor when they don't understand.

I updated several email addresses recently and updated my accounts with most organisations via their websites with the exception of a couple. One being my energy supplier (Shell Energy) who had no facility to update email address. I clicked "contact" expecting a means to contact a human being either by telephone or email but instead got a text based chat bot. It half grasped that I wanted to update something and gave me a link to the page where you can update your phone number but nothing else. I tried to tell it the information it gave me was incorrect but of course that went right over its head. I asked it if I could speak to a real person but apparently not. So it is effectively impossible for me to contact them or to get my email address updated. I added a few four letter words to the chat bots dictionary and gave up.

Every month Shell Energy sends me an email with the link for me to submit that months gas and electricity meter readings. That email will now bounce back to them as undeliverable and consequently I won't be sending them any more meter readings.

Re: Garbage in garbage out

Chris G

According to the article, Gartner says by 2023, 70% of customers will prefer a robot so you must be in s minority.

Of course it is possible that Gartner was naked from the waist down when they pulled that statistic from its storage.

The only thing that pisses me off more than a bot is when companies fob you of with a link to a help forum that is usually no help at all.

I class that as a hindrance not a help.

Re: Garbage in garbage out

Joe W

Ah, you are an O2 customer...

Seriously, an internet provider that cannot be reached by email, that's... strange (mildly put).

Re: Garbage in garbage out

Magani

...with a link to a help forum that is usually no help at all.

I see you've been to Microsoft's site.

Re: Garbage in garbage out

Anonymous Coward

I doubt if that figure would be for 'people asked', more likely that 70% of people will end up interacting with a bot, whether they liked/realised or not

I'll be straight back.

trashsilo

"...we advise our customers to let people know they are talking to a bot"

Surely there is an ethical 'need' to let people know they are talking to a bot ?

Just imagine those poor abusive customers. They will be flat out abusive, crude, lewd or worse and then suddenly hit the wall with these call bots.

Begs the age old question, When is a bot pretending to be a person, a person ?

In the eyes of [Turing|Person|$Law$].

Again very REDUNDERHANDED

Humans at Google?

chivo243

Naw, you must be mistaken, there hasn't been a human at Google for quite some time...

Hell no.

Evil Scot

My interaction with google over a week.

Monday

Google : Are you going to work.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Turn Left onto....

Google : Are you going home.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Perform a U-turn....

Tuesday

Google : Are you going to work.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Turn Left onto....

Google : Are you going home.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Perform a U-turn....

Wednesday

Google : Are you going to work.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Turn Left onto....

Google : Are you going home.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Perform a U-turn....

Thursday

Google : Are you going to work.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Turn Left onto....

Google : Are you going home.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Perform a U-turn....

Friday

Google : Are you going to work.

Me : Yes.

Google: Please wait.. Turn Left onto....

Google : Are you going to the YMCA.

Me : ... FFS Google!!!!! That is -ing protected category data!!!!!

Bollocks

Pascal Monett

" customers will prefer to use speech interfaces "

Given that we don't have the choice, I really wonder where Google is pulling that notion from.

I don't mind being given a choice between four possibilities, as long as the last one is "TALK TO AN ACTUAL HUMAN BEING" (with a brain, preferably).

I perfectly understand that there are very common issues that can be efficiently solved by pressing button 1, 2 or 3, but if your phone talky thingy is the only choice I have to contact you, then you had damn well better have some human operators for dealing with the edge cases your bunch of stupid managers forgot to plan for.

(I tried to get some documentation out of Digital on this, but as far as
I can tell even _they_ don't have it ;-)
-- Linus Torvalds, in an article on a dnserver