News: 1599118146

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Five Eyes nations start new club for competition regulators and paint target on digital giants

(2020/09/03)


The nations of the five eyes alliance – Australia, Canada, New Zealand, the UK and the USA – have started a new club that will see their respective competition agencies “share intelligence, case theories and investigative techniques to better coordinate investigations across international borders”.

The new club operates has the roll-off-the-tongue name “Multilateral Mutual Assistance and Cooperation Framework for Competition Authorities” but will go by “MMAC”.

Three of the signatories – Australia’s Competition and Consumer Commission, New Zealand’s Commerce Commission and the US Department of Justice – mentioned the challenges of the “increasingly digital and global economy” as one reason for the pact. Competition Bureau Canada linked its announcement that it has signed the pact to its digital-heavy [1]Strategic Vision . The US Federal Trade Commission and UK Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) omitted mention of matters digital but did refer to “the global economy” as a reason MMAC is needed.

Facebook rejects Australia's pay-for-news plan, proposes its own idea: How about no more articles at all, sunshine? [2]READ MORE

“This new framework will enhance the CMA’s existing relations with these trusted partners and support effective cooperation, including sharing information and cross-border intelligence gathering, in doing so assisting the UK’s competition investigations,” said CMA CEO Andrea Coscelli in her [3]canned statement

The group has published a [4]memorandum of understanding [PDF] that explains the club is really a set of bilateral agreements that, because they’re common to the five members, mean that when their regulators work together they will play by the same rules.

Those rules came into effect on September 2nd and allow confidential information to be shared among members when it helps an investigation. The memorandum doesn’t give agencies carte blanche to demand assistance, instead outlining rules of engagement designed to ensure work around specific case and ensuring that any investigations that follow are sensitive to differences in local laws.

None of the regulators have named any specific organisation or investigation that spurred the creation of the new club, but all five nations have expressed different degrees of frustration with the likes of Google and Facebook. ®

Get our [5]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.competitionbureau.gc.ca/eic/site/cb-bc.nsf/eng/04513.html

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2020/09/01/facebook_australian_news/

[3] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/cma-to-increase-competition-cooperation-with-international-partners

[4] https://www.ftc.gov/system/files/documents/cooperation_agreements/multilateralcompetitionmou.pdf

[5] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

ummack vs macfucker

chuBb.

Guess thats the reason for ummack (MMAC) winning over MMACFCA?

I await with baited cynicism...

RyokuMas

So this "club" includes the USA...

Given that Google, Amazon, Facebook and Apple [1]spent $20 million in the first half of this year on lobbying congress , you will have to forgive me in my belief that any effort to break their monopolistic deadlock by the other four will immediately be undermined by the USA.

I hope to be proved wrong... but I won't hold my breath

[1] https://www.cnbc.com/2020/07/31/big-tech-spends-20-million-on-lobbying-including-on-coronavirus-bills.html

Re: I await with baited cynicism...

jonathan keith

If not by the US then likely by by the UK government.

The picture that links to the article...

Symon

...has ten eyes on it. Sorry, late one last night, IGMC & --->

https://regmedia.co.uk/2017/06/13/five-eyes.jpg

The old shell game?

Magani

So, most of these countries seem to have some sort of legislation preventing their eavesdropping on their own citizens without a warrant (or at least some sort of quasi-legal process), but how many of them have any restrictions on bugging a citizen of another 5 eyes member, possibly at the request of the citizen's own country?

One suspects that you could replace 'citizen' with 'corporate entity' as required.

Eric Arthur Blair would have loved it.

There's no real need to do housework -- after four years it doesn't get
any worse.