Someone's getting a free trip to the US – well, not quite free. Brit bloke extradited to face $2m+ cyber-scam charges
- Reference: 1598940069
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/09/01/brit_bloke_extradited/
- Source link:
Habeeb Audu was [1]indicted [PDF] in America on counts of bank and wire fraud, money laundering, conspiracy, and identity theft.
The 53-year-old, who operated under the alias Dickson, lived in London and also had Nigerian citizenship. He [2]allegedly was part of a crew scattered around the globe. Its members were said to include: Dominic Labiran, who remains at large and was also based in the UK; Abdulai "Kenny" Saaka, who earlier pleaded guilty to a conspiracy to commit money laundering, operated out of Atlanta in the US; and Alade "Eluku" Sodiq, whose case still pending, lived in the United Arab Emirates. Another member of the group, who agreed to work with US law enforcement, was not named.
Individuals and companies said to have been scammed by the gang were scattered around the world, too, located in the US, Canada, the UK, Italy, and UAE. Audu's case is being heard in the Southern District of New York (Manhattan) where many of the defrauded banks are headquartered.
It is said the crew used combinations of stolen personal information, spoofed phone numbers, fake email accounts, and even voice-altering software to contact bank staff and con them into handing over control of accounts by posing as legit customers.
Rather than plunder big accounts via large wire transfers, this group allegedly went after after holders of personal checking accounts and small businesses. The operation was still said to be lucrative enough; it is claimed that from 2013 until 2019 when he was arrested, Audu and his team were able to pocket more than $2m in proceeds from preying on smaller targets with various types of scams.
Ex-Autonomy CFO Sushovan Hussain loses US appeal bid against fraud convictions and 5-year prison sentence [3]READ MORE
For example, one alleged favorite trick of the group was to phone up a bank using a spoofed number and voice-altering software in order impersonate a customer. Once they had convinced the bank of their identity, the scammer would transfer money from the mark's savings account into checking, then ask for a new debit card to be sent to the scammer's address, it is claimed. This, it is alleged, allowed the group to easily drain the money from the victim's savings account via transfers or purchases.
That's not to say they didn't go after bigger targets on occasion, according to the Feds.
Other alleged schemes were more along the lines of traditional business email compromise (BEC) operations: calling up an organization masquerading as a legit supplier, and asking the business to update its bank records so that money destined for the supplier actually when into the scammers' accounts. The victim in one such scam – a restaurant in Ohio – was said to have been convinced to transfer more than $2m, though it is unclear how much of that was actually siphoned out of the account before the crime was uncovered, it is claimed.
The whole operation came tumbling down, it is said, when in 2019 another member of the crew agreed to work with US law enforcement. Under the oversight of police, that person convinced Audu and other members to agree to launder what they thought were the proceeds from another attack, but was in fact payment set up by the Feds to catch them in the act, it is claimed.
Audu was arrested by London cops on June 26 of that year, and only arrived in the US for trial on Monday. A date for his next hearing in the case was not given. ®
Get our [4]Tech Resources
[1] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/08/31/audu.pdf
[2] https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/acting-us-attorney-announces-extradition-british-citizen-operating-international-money
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/27/sushovan_hussain_autonomy_appeal_loss/
[4] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: It's only money...
Extradition is a normal part of the legal process. If the perpetrator is not in the same country that the victims are, extradition is a way to get the perpetrator to face the charges in the country where the crime happened. The U.K. gets to deny the request if they want to, but they had no reason to do so in this case. If an American group defrauded British banks, the same type of request would have occurred in the other direction. It has nothing to do with subservience or international diplomacy, it's a bog standard part of international criminal law.
Re: It's only money...
Just more "special" as in one-sided relationship in action.
Personally if we were serious about getting that woman over back over here and not allowing her to hide behind diplomatic immunity, bojo and cronies (actually they lack the balls sturgeon should do this) should threaten trump with compulsary purchase of his golf courses for £1 and announce plans to turn them into the "Barrack Obama Multicultural and Asylum Centre", would give it 10 mins before shes flying eastward over the atlantic....
Re: It's only money...
Taking DTs personal* property? Something would definitely be "flying eastward over the Atlantic"
*for every purpose except tax & liabilities, that's what the holding company is for.
Re: It's only money...
I would love to see the toddler nativity version of job's reality distortion field, trying to explain how and why its any different to doing the same on the mexico border, other than in this case it would be to prevent more destruction of sites of scientific interest and actually worth doing...
That and i cant shake the mental image of sturgeon trophy hunting don jr with a well aimed bottle of buckfast and nutting donny dickhead sr in the traditional Glasgow greeting ;)
Re: It's only money...
should threaten trump with compulsary purchase of his golf courses for £1
The phrase "two wrongs don't make a right" comes to mind. Certainly, she should be extradited, but threatening to confiscate unrelated property in an attempt to force an extra-judicial action is the sort of blackmail one might expect from China or Russia. Not the UK.
Re: It's only money...
The sort of blackmail one might expect from China or Russia. Not the UK.
What about a Trade embargo on foreign owned golf courses.
Seems the sort of blackmail the current US administration has become notorious for.
Golf, a threat to national security? Why not.
Re: It's only money...
So there is one case where the USA most likely are doing the wrong thing. Yes, our government should grow a back bone and do something about it. But tearing up any extradition treaty over this is stupid.
Re: It's only money...
Yeah... Now that's an argument that is made much too often and much too easily. What about the people who lost the money? What about the businesses they had going? Especially in this case where the scumbags went after small businesses ? Stolen money can mean shattered dreams. And in some cases even shattered lives.
Personally, I root for the Feds every time they go after cybercrime.
I will root for anyone who goes after cybercrime. Frankly, as far as the law is concerned the Internet is the Wild West, anything goes.
And that goes for multinational behemoths as well, who impose their views in the structures that are supposed to manage how we access and use the Internet.
I really would like a proper legal structure imposed everywhere that protects privacy and enforces fairness, but that is a pipe dream.
However, making the USA respect international treaties and extradition requests is not a pipe dream. It's just unfeasible at this point in time.
Crime doesn't pay?
$2m total, over 6 years, shared by 5 perps. That's about $67,000 per year each - they probably had enough clue to earn this amount honestly if they'd wanted to.
It's only money...
If he had killed someone by driving on the wrong side of the road and then fled the country, being extradited is fair.
But having committed the cardinal sin of stealing money from an American company, the U.K. quietly fulfils its subservient role to the US.