News: 1598489948

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Facebook apologizes to users, businesses for Apple’s monstrous efforts to protect its customers' privacy

(2020/08/27)


Facebook has apologized to its users and advertisers for being forced to respect people’s privacy in an upcoming update to Apple’s mobile operating system – and promised it will do its best to invade their privacy on other platforms.

The antisocial network that makes almost all of its revenue from building a vast, constantly updated database of netizens that it then sells access to, is upset that iOS 14, due out next month, will require apps to ask users for permission before Facebook grabs data from their phones.

“This is not a change we want to make, but unfortunately Apple’s updates to iOS14 have forced this decision,” the behemoth [1]bemoans before thinking the unthinkable: that it may have to end its most intrusive analytics engine for iPhone and iPad users.

You'd think 1.8bn users a day would be enough for Zuck. But no. Oculus fans must sign up for Facebook [2]READ MORE

“We know this may severely impact publishers’ ability to monetize through Audience Network on iOS 14, and, despite our best efforts, may render Audience Network so ineffective on iOS 14 that it may not make sense to offer it on iOS 14 in the future.”

Amazingly, despite Facebook pointing out to Apple that it is tearing away people’s right to have their privacy invaded in order to receive ads for products they might want, Cupertino continues to push ahead anyway.

The result is potentially horrifying. “While it’s difficult to quantify the impact to publishers and developers at this point with so many unknowns, in testing we’ve seen more than a 50 per cent drop in Audience Network publisher revenue when personalization was removed from mobile app ad install campaigns,” Facebook warns.

And who’s to blame? Not Facebook that’s for sure. While it promises that it is “working on short-and long-term strategies to support publishers through these changes,” it feels obliged to point out that it is Apple that “will hurt many of our developers and publishers at an already difficult time for businesses… Many of these are small businesses that depend on ads to support their livelihood.”

Internal data is always correct

It’s hard to imagine how Tim Cook sleeps at night knowing that he is purposely ruining people’s lives by not allowing Facebook to sell people’s personal data to help mom-and-pop stores. And Facebook is nothing if not generous, pointing out that “in 2019 we paid out billions of dollars” - according to “Facebook internal data.”

That’s right, Facebook actually gave some of the money it made from running those ads through its system to the business that paid for those ads. Which doesn’t make any sense but shut up, Facebook is the good guy, ok? And Apple is wrong to be doing this.

Facebook wants advertisers to know however that it has their back. It will continue to suck as much information as possible off every other device and through every other operating system.

Unfortunately, however, it will require them to [3]set up a completely new advertising account to run campaigns for iOS users, because it’s not going to apply Apple’s new privacy protection measures any further than it has to. Again, though, this is Apple’s fault, not Facebook’s. Apple made the changes.

Facebook closes out by promising that it will do all it can to prevent user privacy from being respected in future. “We believe that industry consultation is critical for changes to platform policies, as these updates have a far-reaching impact on the developer ecosystem," it said.

"We’re encouraged by conversations and efforts already taking place in the industry - including within the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C) and the recently announced Partnership for Responsible Addressable Media (PRAM). We look forward to continuing to engage with these industry groups to get this right for people and small businesses.” ®

Get our [4]Tech Resources



[1] https://www.facebook.com/audiencenetwork/news-and-insights/preparing-audience-network-for-ios14/#

[2] https://www.theregister.com/2020/08/18/oculus_facebook_login/

[3] https://www.facebook.com/business/news/preparing-our-partners-for-ios-14-launch/

[4] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

cd

Hopefully the Linux Foundation will be more reasonable.

I'm confused

tfewster

Are Apple the good guys now?

Loved the spin in the article, the tag must be working overtime.

The more Facebook whines

DS999

The more it sounds like music to my ears.

I'm sure Apple's marketing department also doesn't mind Facebook giving iOS 14 better press than anything Tim Cook could possibly say about it at next month's yearly event.

It is like Johnson & Johnson complaining that the newest Nikes cut in half the amount of blisters you get from distance running which will negatively impact their sales of Band Aids.

Bad guy vs bad guy

759b954e-617b-408b-a2b1-f5a42c3688d4

Privacy-invading ad giant flummoxed by developer-gouging overpriced hardware slinger.

A plague on both their houses.

Re: Bad guy vs bad guy

HildyJ

There are degrees of bad and I hope Zuck gets Cooked.

Re: Bad guy vs bad guy

Dave 126

> overpriced hardware slinger

I guess that the conclusion 'overpriced' can only be reached after considering the values you assign to money and to privacy.

Personalised ads actually make less money

Blackjack

Than ads related to what a person is looking or searching for.

If I am looking to buy a Tv why the hell would I click ads about something that's you know... not a TV?

The business is in selling the data not in the personalised ads themselves.

Re: Personalised ads actually make less money

A random security guy

Not everyone is like you. There are many who will click

Re: Personalised ads actually make less money

Neil Barnes

There are (allegedly) many robots who will click...

Re: Personalised ads actually make less money

Dave 126

If I want a TV, I research TVs, search for a good price and then buy a TV. Then I see lots of advertisements on websites for TVs - advertisements that are wasted inner because I already have a TV.

It would seem that personalised advertising would work better if it only shows me ads for things I have never searched for. "Ohh, an ad for a steel mcguffin, I had no idea they made those... it looks kind of neat, I might buy one!"

Buggy as hell anyway...

GFK1

Until FB fix the double-space typing bug... er, feature, on iPads with a keyboard, and the one where I have to tap every single thing twice to make it do anything, you'd need your head read to try and use FB on one anyway! I don't, so I don't.

Facebook Tracking

RM Myers

I have to admit that the anger in this article toward Facebook tracking would be much more convincing if I wasn't seeing a button in Firefox, while reading the article, with the text bubble:

"Facebook container has disabled this button and blocked Facebook from tracking your visit to this page."

Re: Facebook Tracking

Dave 126

It is convincing. Facebook is rightly more worried by the default behaviour of a popular OS as shipped than it is by an individual browser chosen by the user.

Tax and title extra.