US govt proposes elephant showers for every American after Prez Trump says trickles dampen his haircare routine
- Reference: 1597330752
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/08/13/trump_power_shower/
- Source link:
No, not rocketing unemployment. Shower pressure standards.
As part of The White House's deregulation crusade, which helpfully distracts from the pandemic and has made it look like Trump is doing something in the run-up to the election, the US government has proposed to change showerhead definitions to increase water flow.
Not because there's an issue with how they work or anything – today's showerheads "achieve high levels of customer satisfaction", [1]according to the Consumer Reports organisation – but because Trump has publicly complained about how they supposedly affect his [2]haircare routine .
In a [3]South Lawn speech last month, the commander-in-chief railed against "job-killing regulations... a merciless avalanche of wasteful and expensive and intrusive federal regulation. These oppressive, burdensome mandates were a stealth tax on our people – slashing take-home pay, suppressing innovation, surging the cost of goods, and shipping millions of American jobs overseas – millions and millions and millions."
But taking a brief tangent, he said: "We're bringing back consumer choice in home appliances so that you can buy washers and dryers, showerheads and faucets. So showerheads – you take a shower, the water doesn't come out. You want to wash your hands, the water doesn't come out. So what do you do? You just stand there longer or you take a shower longer? Because my hair – I don't know about you, but it has to be perfect. Perfect."
[4]Youtube Video
A 1992 law limits showerheads to produce no more than 2.5 gallons (9.5l) of water per minute, but Trump makes it sound like Americans across the Land of the Free are routinely met with a trickle each morning.
Other outlets have deftly swerved the issue, but we're going to go right out and say it. Trump has the shittiest hair in the history of western democracy, followed closely by UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson, and we fear that American showers able to blast muck off elephants would dissolve Donny's golden locks – or what's left of them.
Consumer groups and conservationists share similar concerns, with one telling the Associated Press that more nozzles could result in "10, 15 gallons per minute powering out of the showerhead, literally probably washing you out of the bathroom."
Reuters suggested that the proposals may never get the go-ahead anyway. The news wire said: "Trump is campaigning for reelection and trails in opinion polls ahead of the vote Nov. 3. If he wins and the proposal advances it could also face court battles."
This isn't the first weirdly personal deregulation fixation Trump has expressed. Last year, before an audience of Republican legislators in Baltimore, he accused energy-efficient lightbulbs of making him look orange, rather than, say, hypothetical gallons of fake tan.
Trump blames new energy efficient light bulbs for making him "look orange." [5]pic.twitter.com/IZ6DmBBtgU — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) [6]September 13, 2019
At another Republican rally in New Mexico, he raved: "They took away our lightbulb. I want an incandescent light. I want to look better, OK? I want to pay less money to look better. Does that make sense? You pay much less money and you look much better. And on top of that, with the new bulbs, if they break it's considered a hazardous waste site. It's all gases inside and you're supposed to bring it back to where you bought it in a sealed container. Give me a break.
"I asked the people, the professionals. Well, what do people do when it breaks, because they break all the time? What do they do? Nothing, they throw it away. So I owe – a lot of people didn't know, they didn't understand. You get a much better light at a much reduced cost, and it's much safer. Because when those other bulbs break they really are dangerous. The gases come out, they're dangerous."
The US nonprofit Fact Check explained how he's talking nonsense [7]here , in case you were in any doubt.
Now, we're no experts, but isn't running a country about amending and creating policy for the good of all, rather than the strangely specific and narcissistic whims of the leader? Huh, just us then. The funniest thing is, he'll probably win the election too. ®
Updated to add at 1800 UTC
Somewhat more worryingly, President Trump has [8]just now opposed a boost in funding for the US Postal Service in order to make it harder for more citizens to vote by mail. The President fears he will lose the November election if enough people vote for Democrat rival Joe Biden by post rather than by queuing up at poll stations in a pandemic.
Folks are encouraged to [9]drop off their ballots in deposit boxes in person rather than rely on USPS to deliver their votes.
Get our [10]Tech Resources
[1] https://uk.reuters.com/article/us-usa-water-trump/trump-hair-rinsing-complaints-prompt-u-s-to-ease-shower-standards-idUKKCN2582Y1
[2] https://www.rootclaim.com/claims/what-is-the-story-behind-donald-trump-s-hair-12734
[3] https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/remarks-president-trump-rolling-back-regulations-help-americans/
[4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7dVifY0PgKc
[5] https://t.co/IZ6DmBBtgU
[6] https://twitter.com/atrupar/status/1172308837212098560?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw
[7] https://www.factcheck.org/2019/09/trump-bends-the-facts-on-lightbulbs/
[8] https://www.npr.org/2020/08/13/902109991/trump-admits-to-opposing-funding-for-postal-service-to-block-more-voting-by-mail
[9] https://www.npr.org/2020/08/11/901066396/ballot-drop-boxes-become-latest-front-in-voting-legal-fights
[10] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
It's a back-combed mullet - this is why rednecks love him so much.
"Actual real hair"
...and a girlfriend, but you wouldn't know her. She lives in... Montreal..?
"followed closely by UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson"
No, I think The Brits may have one that one...
Re: "followed closely by UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson"
If you seriously think that look at the picture the Beeb used to illustrate this story. it's ill-hair-ious.
I would have thought that the Republican Party, in its current guise, and those who defend it and its indefensible actions, were a big enough shower without requiring any change to the current legislation.
Surely the washing instructions
say dry clean only?
Re: Surely the washing instructions
You aren't supposed to dry clean hamsters.
Re: Surely the washing instructions
You aren't supposed to dry clean hamsters.
I wonder how much duct tape the White House buys?
The Idiot in the Oval Office ...
... is attempting to get an Emmy. A daytime Emmy.
For his hair.
And that is the legacy the big, fat orange one with tiny hands has invented for himself.
As a side note ...
... I use a drill to remove the flow restriction in my shower. Works a treat.
But drills are probably too complicated for Dummy to wrap his tiny little hands mind around.
Why assume he will win?
It's easy to be worldly-wise and shrug your shoulders and say 'he will probably win', but why preemptively bend the neck? Why create a mind-set for 'an inevitable' which is not?
Why assume...
It's the hair on his head he's struggling with? I suspect with all the KFC and McDonalds he claims to eat, he has turds of such staggering density and adhesion, that he must need a zookeeper with a wirebrush to drag the sticky shit nuggets out of his arse hair.
What he needs is a visit to 3M of BASF to have them produce an appropriate 'bunghole safe' solvent to scrub and scrape his crack with.
I thought the only showers he was interested in came from Russian prostitutes?
The problem with water consumption limits is..
That they don't take into account local factors. I live in a part of the UK where there is very rarely (every 20 years from experience) any shortage of water, yet I'm still forced to have showers with poor flow and toilets that barely shift the detritus from the bowl, nevermind down the 10m of soil pipe to the sewer. Water is in plentiful supply where I live, but because it can get a little short in and around the capital, we all have to suffer.
Re: The problem with water consumption limits is..
We aren't restricted in the UK. Some water companies try to reduce the pressure to reduce costs, but there isn't a flow restriction.
The shower in my current place could be used as a weapon!
Re: The problem with water consumption limits is..
Eh? Reduced pressure = reduced flow capacity (i.e. flow restriction)
If the OHSG wins...
I will flag down the next passing Vogon ship & volunteer to listen to poetry for a ride off this rock.
Oh has diddums thrown his toys out of the pram (again)?
It really is time for him to be taken to a place of safefy, his safety. He is a real danger to the civilised world.
Please USA throw this [redacted][redacted] out on his fat arse in November.
Re: Oh has diddums thrown his toys out of the pram (again)?
It's ok, he has a never ending supply of new toys to throw out of his pram... and they're the best toys, the most expensive toys, the greatest toys and they're made for Americans (in China).... sorry and they're paid for by American taxpayers.
Wrong lightbulbs...
He's probably thinking of CFL lights. They contain (very small amounts) of Mercury. Hence being class as hazardous materials. Anyone with their wits about them started switching to LED lights years ago.
Re: Wrong lightbulbs...
I've still got a load of CFL lights in the house... I've lived here 11yrs and I fitted all CFL lights when I bought the house. I've had 2 of them fail in 11yrs... but as I replace them I'm switching to LED ones.
As for the LED ones I do have... some of them have lasted 6-7yrs so far... so quality is not an issue.
I have no idea what old Grumpy Trumpy is doing to make them fail so often.
Re: Wrong lightbulbs...
I've had the opposite experience with LEDs.
The two big ideas behind LEDs are that they use less energy and they last longer, so less waste. The energy savings is hard to refute, as they definitely use much less than traditional incandescents (not taking into consideration any manufacturing differences that might require different levels of "energy" to produce them). The lifespan thing... well... I hope you don't have fader switches. For non-fader switches, they seem to have very few problems. However, you put them on a fader, and it seems to dramatically shorten their lifespan.
By my estimate, over the past 3-4 years, we've had at least 5-6 LED bulbs die that are on faders. They don't completely die like traditional bulbs. They start having flickering issues and sometimes will randomly cut off then back on. If you're smart enough, you keep the original box and receipt, and the manufacturer will usually replace them without problems (they typically come with a five year warranty).
The biggest problem with the push to more efficient bulbs was that it was so aggressive. Halogen weren't really any better (and often times a shorter life span), CFLs just plain suck, and LEDs have had a lot of teething issues. Technology STILL hasn't caught up to it (as exhibited by my experience). I remember the earlier days of LEDs where they wouldn't work at ALL on a fader. As they progressed, you then had issues where only certain faders were "compatible" (I think an analog vs digital thing). So in addition to getting new bulbs (which were closer to $7-$10 each at the time), you also needed to replace all of your fader switches.
Re: Wrong lightbulbs...
I believe the maths advises to swap them out for LEDs before they fail. The replacement costs are offset by lower running costs. Just remember to recycle the mercury....
Clean water will become more and more costly as population increases. Already in the US lake Mead behind the Hoover dam is at a record low level meaning they are contemplating actually pumping water back up from down river to top it up.
So having shower heads just pissing water away to please the orange one is not going to help preserve water.
What hair? Thats a bloody wig.
I bet he's never spent an hour washing his hair. I have, but then I have actual real hair and lots of it.