News: 1597216747

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Wi-Fi 6 isn't signed off yet, but boffins are already teasing us with specs for venerable wireless tech's next gen

(2020/08/12)


As the IEEE 802.11 project, forebearer of Wi-Fi, marks its [1]30th anniversary next month, Wi-Fi 6 (802.11ax) gear is just beginning to appear in the market, even as the spec awaits final ratification later this year.

But wireless networking boffins are already salivating at the prospect of Wi-Fi 7 (802.11be), the specification that's currently being developed. Its 1.0 draft spec is due in May 2021, to be followed by 2.0 in March 2022, 3.0 in November 2022, and 4.0 in November 2023, punctuated by a final version in 2024.

Still, it's not too early to be excited if Wi-Fi is your livelihood, which in a way it has become for everyone who relies on wireless connectivity amid the ongoing coronavirus pandemic.

In a paper

[2]PDF

distributed through ArXiv, a quartet of boffins from Nokia Bell Labs in Dublin, Ireland, and Universitat Pompeu Fabra, in Barcelona, Spain – Adrian Garcia-Rodriguez, David Lopez-Perez, Lorenzo Galati-Giordano, and Giovanni Geraci – revisit the Wi-Fi spec planning process for technology that they cheekily rank as an essential, right after food, shelter, and clean water in Maslow's hierarchy of needs.

"While we would argue that humans do not need [the] internet more than breathable air, the importance of Wi-Fi is unquestionable," they write in "IEEE 802.11be: Wi-Fi 7 Strikes Back." "During forced confinement, many of us resorted to Wi-Fi to be in touch with our loved ones, to place online orders that kept small businesses afloat, and to keep fit by taking live streaming yoga classes."

Wi-Fi 7, they claim, will not only live up to its name – 802.11be Extremely High Throughput – but will offer a number of features that will help the technology address the growing demands being placed on wireless networks.

Bits and bytes

In terms of speed, Wi-Fi 7 was initially planned to support data rates of at least 30 Gbps per access point, compared to Wi-Fi 6 which can manage about 10 Gbps with eight antennas, 160-MHz bandwidth, and 1024 QAM (quadrature amplitude modulation).

A [3]paper published in May, "Current Status and Directions of IEEE 802.11be, the Future of Wi-Fi 7," suggests it could be faster still, about four times faster than Wi-Fi 6, thanks to improvements in the physical networking layer. The plan is to double both the bandwidth (to 320 MHz) and the number of spatial streams in MI-MIMO, which multiplies the nominal throughput by a factor of four.

Battle for 6GHz heats up in America: Broadcasters sue FCC to kill effort to open spectrum for private Wi-Fi [4]READ MORE

With the addition of higher rate modulation and coding schemes that come from 4K-QAM (up from 1024-QAM), another 20 per cent improvement in nominal throughput is expected, meaning Wi-Fi 7 could muster a maximum nominal throughput of 46 Gbps. Bear in mind these are theoretical maximums.

"802.11be will focus on increasing capacity and link throughput in WLANs, and will also improve their latency and jitter," said Giovanni Geraci, assistant professor at UPF Barcelona and one of the paper's co-authors, in an email to The Register. "In other words, peak throughput improvements are the main target, as the name says, 'Extremely High Throughput.'"

Geraci said these goals will bring other benefits. "One example could be multi-link operations, where one could potentially use more bandwidth at once, but also could have more flexibility in how to use it, which may lead to a better end-user experience," he said.

If the spec can deliver lower latency and higher reliability, Geraci and his colleagues expect to see applications emerge that take advantage of the improved networking environment.

"The former is seen as an enabler for real-time applications including augmented and virtual reality, gaming, and cloud computing, demanding delay times reduced to below 5 ms," explain the networking boffins in their paper.

"The latter is critical for next generation factories and enterprises, where Wi-Fi may need to guarantee three or more 'nines' of reliability to aim at replacing some wired communications."

Wild West of spectrum

Coincidentally, there will be a larger playing field to achieve those goals at least in the US: The FCC [5]decided [PDF] in April to approve the unlicensed use of the 6 GHz band. The Wi-Fi Alliance is expected to certify Wi-Fi 6E devices using the newly freed spectrum next year.

The first draft of 802.11be, Release 1, is expected to include support for multi-link operation, which should help realize both speed and latency ambitions. The spec will make the ability of modern chip sets to support multiple independent links more coordinated, more efficient, and less subject to interference amid dense deployments.

Under the new regime, multi-link devices will sport features like multi-link discovery and setup, traffic-link mapping, and more efficient power management capabilities. Wi-Fi 7 may also include coordinated spatial reuse (CSR), an improvement on the spatial reuse system introduced in 802.11ax.

"In CSR, a sharing AP [access point] that has acquired a transmission opportunity (TXOP) can trigger one or more other shared APs to perform simultaneous transmission with appropriate power control and link adaptation," the Wi-Fi 7 Strikes Back paper explains.

"This coordination will create more spatial reuse opportunities and reduce the number of collisions when compared with the spatial reuse schemes available in 802.11ax."

Release 2 is likely to gild the lily by doubling the maximum number of supported single-user MIMO (SU-MIMO) and multi-user MIMO (MU-MIMO) spatial streams to 16. It's also expected to see the introduction of Hybrid Automatic Repeat Request (HARQ), a scheme for devices to pass on (rather than drop) decoding errors to increase the chance of successful decoding, and to support various techniques for reducing latency and enhancing AP coordination.

Garcia-Rodriguez, Lopez-Perez, Galati-Giordano, and Geraci anticipate that demand for Wi-Fi and better wireless connectivity will continue to grow as more devices integrate networking capability, as more data gets collected and transmitted, and as more people rely on live video to work, learn, and interact remotely.

All this should mean Wi-Fi 7 is likely to get a warm welcome when it arrives. ®

Get our [6]Tech Resources



[1] https://web.archive.org/web/20200420072938/https://standards.ieee.org/events/802-11.html

[2] https://arxiv.org/pdf/2008.02815.pdf

[3] https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=9090146

[4] https://www.theregister.com/2020/07/28/nab_spectrum_fcc/

[5] https://docs.fcc.gov/public/attachments/DOC-363490A1.pdf

[6] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/

Wifi generations

b0llchit

I'm sincerely conflicted here. On one side we have Zaminski's law (*) and good, fast, cheap; pick two... . When we reach wifi version 7, will it a) be able to read my email or b) be very good and fast so that it is too expensive? Maybe I'm just missing the AI angle (**) , which makes the standard evolve in a natural way to adapt to the environment it is used in. Then it surely will be able to read email and be horribly priced.

Transmitting analog signals has been very stable (radio/TV) for a long time. In the digital age, we are "fixing" the transmission/encodings every few years. What a waste of resources we are creating. Maybe we should take a break and let practicalities prevail over shiny-shiny-new-new hypes every few years?

(*) Yes, yes, its about software, but wifi is 95% software on top of not too complex hardware (relatively speaking).

(**) AI probably planned for wifi version 8 or 9, maybe, when the market droids can see a profit?

Re: Wifi generations

anthonyhegedus

You have a point. Wouldn't it be good to invent a software-upgradeable spec. Something whereby wifi-7 devices will always be able to upgrade - at least for the next few iterations - with software alone. It might make for bulkier, more expensive hardware, but at least it's hardware that won't need to be thrown away when a new spec comes along with faster speeds. There is of course the fact that the hardware doesn't need to be thrown away at all: if you've got a wifi-7 device, it'll still *work* with wifi-8 and 9, just slower.

Analogue TV has been around for a while as you say, but it had many different specs (PAL, SECAM, NTSC) and different variants of each. It made hardware totally incompatible unless it was designed specifically for compatibility. But yes, once we settled on a spec, it did last a while, at least within one country.

Re: Wifi generations

john.w

Having worked on the 802.11a to 11ad chipsets the problem is the chip has a selling price based on its silicon area and the software to run it is provide free.

Nick Ryan

Ah yes, super duper really clever WiFi with a growing number of ariels. All quite incompatible except in fallback mode with the huge number of mobile phones, tablets and laptops and the odd other device type that are out there.

None of this really gets past the fact that there is limited bandwidth, this is shared between all devices within range (which is a very variable concept) and as a result often sucks balls in any form of vaguely high densitity environment such as where one has more than one or two neighbours. Wires may not be so glamorous, nor so convenient (which is the major advantage of WiFi) but are considerably more efficient, faster and reliable.

Charles 9

"Wires may not be so glamorous, nor so convenient..."

Nor so easy to change out when their specs improve (like switching your cables from Cat5 or even Cat3 to Cat6). Plus it requires access to the infrastructure: not guaranteed.

I once read on research into "massive" MIMO setups that are claimed to have no theoretical limit on bandwidth efficiency, though I'm of course taking this with a pinch of salt, given at some point you hit physical limits like radio wavelengths and so on.

Something missing

AMBxx

No mention of any new conspiracy theories? Brain control, Covid spreading, cancer causing?

Wi-Fi 7 had us on 'Extremely High Throughput'...

Anonymous Coward

It also can burn tumours away if you stand too close to your your router. And cause third degree burns too.

Is that a hedgehog in your pocket?

TrumpSlurp the Troll

Or just the latest MiMo device?

Intel Shenanigans

FXi

So with the Wifi standard being upended every 2-3 years, why would Intel (who recently purchased the Killer lineup and makes the #1 preferred wifi client cards) be so gung ho about soldering wifi chips in mobile devices? Planned decrepitude anyone?

WFii 6 + 5g =

Efer Brick

Conspiracy theories e11 ?

Meanwhile...

P.B. Lecavalier

Meanwhile my internet access speed is well below the limits of wireless-N, so no salivation on my part.

Also, questionable name in "802.11be".

Is it n, ac or ax?

It's "be"!

Wow, you are on wireless-b??? Good on you to be so patient.

No, it's "bee EEE!"

Ok you got to have a certain age to have known 802.11b... which was even before I had any such device.

Better by far you should forget and smile than that you should remember
and be sad.
-- Christina Rossetti