Transport for London asks Capita to fling Congestion Charge system into the cloud
- Reference: 1597061835
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/08/10/transport_for_london_capita_contract/
- Source link:
TfL hired Capita to manage tech for the Congestion Charge when it was first established in 2003. It then replaced the integrator in [2]2009 with IBM only to return the contracted work back to Capita in 2014.
The latest five-year £355m renewal from October 2021 comprises an extension to further work on the Congestion charge's digitisation, and other fresh elements such as the expansion of the Ultra Low Emission Zone to include the inner London area bounded by the North and South Circular Roads.
The contract will include running the registration and monitoring service for TfL's Direct Vision Standards to measure the level of direct visibility an HGV driver has via their cab window. This is supposed to reduce the risk of accidents. Capita will also implement more changes to the Low Emission Zone (LEZ) standards for HGVs and buses.
The ULEZ has, according to TfL, contributed to a 44 per cent reduction in roadside NO 2 within its current area of use and 79 per cent of vehicles entering the zone have met its emission standards.
Capita said it will look at "transforming and further improving the efficiency of the ways TfL customers can address their queries about the services, through the introduction of digital technologies".
"This includes migrating the existing technology – used to operate the Congestion Charge, LEZ and ULEZ, and which processes an average of 1.5 million roadside images a day – to the cloud. This is designed to ensure that the operations are more flexible and should enable the company to scale the service quickly to incorporate the ULEZ expansion being delivered on behalf of TFL."
To cope with the contract expansion, Capita said it is set to hire and train 900 more staff, the "majority" of which will be "encouraged" to work from home.
Capita CEO Jon Lewis, [3]hired in 2017 to help turn the business from a loss-making entity into something altogether more sustainable, was cock-a-hoop with the renewal, pointing out that Capita had previously rolled out the ULEZ "on time and on budget, and will draw on our track record of transformation and digitally enabled services, as well as adding value for our shareholders".
Let's not forget the shareholders.
Lewis failed to mention previous [4]implementation delays in rolling out new IT systems under TfL's congestion charging project in 2016. But why would he? This was before his time.
Helen Chapman, TfL's director of licensing, regulation and charging, said: "These projects are vital to cleaning up London's toxic air, encouraging people to make more sustainable travel choices and keeping people safe on the capital's roads. The expansion of the ULEZ to the North and South Circular will be transformational, reducing road transport NOx emissions by around 30 per cent and improving air quality for millions of Londoners."
Phew, thank goodness it is in capable hands. ®
Get our [5]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.investegate.co.uk/capita-plc/cpi/contracts-extension/20200810070000P94D1/?fe=1&utm_source=FE%20Investegate%20Alerts&utm_medium=Email&utm_content=Announcement%20Alert%20Mail&utm_campaign=Capita%20PLC%20Alert
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2007/10/26/ibm_congestion_charge_deal/
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2017/10/10/capita_goes_to_jon_lewis_for_ceo/
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2017/03/02/capita_2016_blunders/
[5] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
£355m for 5 years!!!!
£71m a year to charge people to go into central London.
Considering the volumes of traffic still entering and paying to enter the emissions zone clearly the current transport mechanism is lacking functionality to help reduce those numbers further.
The thing is, the more successful at converting journeys to non congestion/ emissions charging alternatives the more the charges need to become to pay for this infrastructure!!!!
Re: £355m for 5 years!!!!
From an economics point of view the London congestion charge system is a no-brainer.
We have a scarce resource (road space in central London) and undesirable phenomena (pollution, traffic jams, noise) that appear to be price sensitive. By putting a price on these, people decide to avoid using up scarce space, pollute etc. where they can.
As a local government you can even tweak the knobs to encourage and discourage some behaviour (no fees for electric vehicles* or key workers, extra high fees for heavy polluters, turning the system on and off on specific times depending on the goal du jour) making it a policy instrument.
It seems to have worked too, if you look at the takeup of bus journeys (the bus system was barely functional prior to the congestion charge introduction as walking was often quicker) and the improvements in air quality (admittedly with still a long way to go as London and Athens seem to be battling for the honour of having the worst air quality in Europe) then it has worked.
Obviously running the system it comes at a huge cost that should be solely born by people entering the CC zone but, as someone living in London (inside the ULEZ but just outside CCZ) I would not mind at all if the city made a profit out of it that could go towards infrastructure improvement in other areas.
* Obviously this will need a review in a couple of years when many more cars are EVs but they can cross that bridge when they get to it.
This will be crap, mainly because the actual talented people of capita are leaving or looking for other jobs.
Mr Lewis said that they will put more money into retaining talent. That was a bunch of crap because several talent people have left, and to "try to keep them" they were offered an extra grand.... lol it is pathetic. These people are getting 5k-10k more at their new jobs.
"talented people of capita"???
To be honest...
...and it might be me but as far as I know the Congestion Charging system is one of the few large scale IT projects that actually seems to work well. Well in the sense that I don't frequently read about cock-ups, outages and other disasters. For instance, I am not holding my breath for all the new customs infrastructure that is currently developed in haste.
Is it a question of me just not having noticed any major issues with CC recently or is this one of those cases where good news is no news?
Re: To be honest...
They charge a ridiculous amount of money, but yes, at least it works!
Re: To be honest...
I agree, but I'll also add that whilst not problem-free, the Oyster system (contactless card for TfL public transport) seems to have held up well over the many years it's been in place. It has had its crashes but I believe the last significant one was more than four years ago and the one (or two as it happened) was eight years before that one.
I imagine the Oyster system must be way more complicated than the CC system. Don't know about the volume of data (guessing more people travel on public transport in any one day than enter the CC zone?) but the complexity and nature of the Oyster data must be way more.
Re: To be honest...
Good point, Oyster works well too and is likely a lot more complex.
The main challenges with CC are probably the accuracy of the ANPR system (even a 1% failure rate would be a lot of work on appeals from people in North Yorkshire or summat who will contest they were not driving in London at the time) and how to deal with non-UK license plates entering the zone.
Re: To be honest...
As said above, Oyster does work, mostly. Whoever designed the system did a good job,
It's not perfect, but it reliably handles hundreds of thousands, if not millions, of journeys a day.
If I had a pick faults, it would be that the cards themselves can be a little unreliable, (been using Oyster for ten years, and had dozens of cards just fail on me, and even my current card doesn't show up as being properly registered to my account, despite TFL assuring me it is).
Another thing I'd like to see is the ability to update my card via the iPhone app. The new versions of the Southern and Southeastern apps can upload tickets bought online to their cards via NFC. I'd like the TFL Oyster app to do the same, but they don't seem to be updating it.
Re: To be honest...
...as far as I know the Congestion Charging system is one of the few large scale IT projects that actually seems to work well.
It's working! Can't have that. Let's stick it in 'the cloud'.
900 more staff?
To cope with the contract expansion, Capita said it is set to hire and train 900 more staff, the "majority" of which will be "encouraged" to work from home.
WTF are 900 additional staff going to be doing? How many people are already working on this?
Do they have the same productivity as Serco's covid contact tracers?
Re: 900 more staff?
I recon 850 of those staff will be trying to look at 1.5 Million emails of images between them every day.
So Capita scored another huge government contract
And it is going to make transformations to bring the system into the cloud.
I eagerly await the article that will tell us how Capita screwed this one up.
The charge is 17 years old but they have still not developed a system to confirm if you need to pay or not.
Its Capita, so the worst that could happen is....
Dear Mr. Hack,
Thanks to our world-leading technology deployment, your car's Nevada (United States) license plate has been detected driving or parked in the London Low and Ultra Low Emissions Zone 2,117 times in the last month. Per Transport for London's congestion charge policies, please remit 38,174.83 Sterling, or the U.S. equivalent $59,362.15, per the enclosed invoice.
That's our story and we're sticking to it,
Capita, on behalf of Transport for London
I thought that TfL was flat broke?
That's what the Mayor was bleating about just a few months ago. Now they can spend loadsamoney moving a working system into the cloud that as we all know sometimes does not work.
Why?
...because PHB's always learn from past mistakes. Right?