UK space firms forced to adjust their models of how the universe works as they lose out on Copernicus contracts
- Reference: 1593705614
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/07/02/uk_copernicus_loser/
- Source link:
The [1]Copernicus Sentinels pump Earth observation data into ground-based services and, coupled with input from air and ground stations, provide a continuously updated picture of the overall health of the planet. There are currently three complete two-satellite constellations in orbit along with a single satellite, [2]Sentinel-5P .
The spacecraft currently orbiting provide day and night radar imaging, optical imaging, ocean and land monitoring and atmospheric observations. Additional satellites for more detailed atmospheric composition monitoring and altimetry sea level observations are planned for the coming years.
The next generation of the Copernicus programme features six "High Priority Candidate" (HPC) missions, including carbon dioxide monitoring, polar ice and snow topography and land surface temperature observations. Being the [3]fourth largest contributor to ESA , the UK would have been forgiven for expecting that at least one of the six juicy prime contracts on offer might have come Blighty's way, but it appears not.
Germany contributes twice as much as the UK to ESA's coffers, and both France and Italy are ahead of Great Britain. Those that contribute (including the UK) expect a return on their investment.
According to the [4]German Aerospace Center , ESA has now awarded contracts worth more than €2.5bn for the construction of the HPC satellites. €800m of that will flow directly to space companies in Germany. France, Italy and Spain were also on the receiving the end of ESA's largesse.
It would appear that the consortia involved were reluctant to put UK leads on the bids while the Brexit mayhem was unfolding, and the continuing uncertainty has left its mark.
The UK Space Agency struggled to conceal its disappointment and abstained from the approval vote.
A spokesperson told The Register : "While UK organisations will play important roles in five out of the six Copernicus High Priority Candidate missions, we are disappointed overall with the contract proposals and abstained on the vote to approve them. We are committed to working closely with ESA to ensure our investments deliver industrial returns that align with our national ambitions for space."
However, it will be scraping along at a bare minimum of the geographic return.
The UK [5]enjoys a healthy space sector , with income from technology supporting Earth observation growing at 25 per cent. A large chunk of revenue generated by the UK's space industry comes from EU countries as well as ESA.
The loss of the Copernicus follow-on is, however, hardly a surprise. The mission is a joint EU-ESA affair and was added to a potential Brexit "divorce bill" [6]back in 2018 . Of course, in those days Whitehall still reckoned a "no-deal" exit from the EU for the UK was "unlikely", but here we are.
The issue is that while the encryption worries of the EU's other satellite project, Galileo, are not at play with Copernicus, the British government had recognised that since the UK would no longer be in the EU club, it would have no say on how EU projects were run. It also warned that Brit businesses and academics could well find their bids for new Copernicus work blocked.
Far be it from us to suggest that the UK lacks the clout it once had. While ESA is above all the Brexit shenanigans, it is the EU that will fund the building of the satellites. With the UK's status in the post-Brexit world still up in the air, one can well imagine that keeping Blighty in the mix could be risky until the Britain's future status has been decided – be it as a "third country" or something else.
Dr Bleddyn Bowen, a lecturer in International Relations and Space Policy, wasn't surprised how things had turned out and told The Reg : "Copernicus is an EU project that's implemented by ESA, so EU space industrial policy and georeturn takes precedence over ESA's own georeturn principles. Naturally, EU member states and their industries are prioritised for the bigger contracts as it's a major plank of EU space policy and its funding contribution to ESA."
Meanwhile, the [7]UK government had words of consolation for space tech-slingers today. Yeah, so you won't be winning any prime Copernicus contracts, but look – here's "up to" £75k.
As the saying goes, and is doubtless echoing through the corridors of both space agencies and space industries: "As ye sow, so will ye reap". ®
Get our [8]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.esa.int/Applications/Observing_the_Earth/Copernicus/Overview3
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2020/03/20/coronavirus_air_quality/
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2019/11/28/esa_budget_boost/
[4] https://www.dlr.de/content/en/articles/news/2020/03/20200701_rewarding-contracts-copernicus-hpcm.html
[5] https://www.theregister.com/2019/01/30/uk_space_14_8_billion/
[6] https://www.theregister.com/2018/09/14/galileo_brexit_guidance/
[7] https://www.gov.uk/government/news/up-to-75000-available-for-uk-space-technology-projects?
[8] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
"It's shocking and unfair, just because the UK renounced it's club membership, it's not allowed club benefits anymore."
I must have missed when we left the ESA. Not everything with E in the title is run by the EU.
This project is, though
Copernicus is an EU-funded project, implemented by the ESA.
The difference didn't use to matter. It does now.
Not a single mention of the [1]ESA's £100m investment in a new Business Incubation Centre in Leicester?
Copernicus is an EU project like Galileo. So we will no longer get to participate (pending the new UK-EU Treaty).
But the ESA is a what-you-put-in-you-get-out agency. We contribute money, and the ESA will continue to award a proportionate work-share to the UK. There's no "winning" or "losing out" - we are guaranteed our share of ESA projects.
But we won't get a share of EU projects awarded to the ESA for delivery because we're not part of the EU (unless we successfully get a Swiss-type deal which permits participation, which is why the Swiss are able to work on Galileo).
[1] https://www.business-live.co.uk/technology/infinity-beyond-european-space-agenc
But many voted to remove the UK from anything with "E" in the name. EU, ECHR, ESA, UEFA, Eurovision....
Of course not.
And in other News.. well, on the BBC, Politico and City AM, there's a story about organised crime gangs being arrested across Europe (750 arrests, 77 guns, 2 tonnes of drugs), thanks to cracking an encrypted app - hey, that's an IT story, Reg must be covering that.
Oh, no, forgot, no anti-BREXIT slant possible.
Not part of the EU? Not likely to get parts of EU projects.
You'd have to be pretty ignorant, stupid or gullible, to think otherwise.*
Still at least Blighty is hard at work on the GPS**
*I'm not discounting the possibility of people being all three of course.
**Gammon Positioning System.
Re: Not part of the EU? Not likely to get parts of EU projects.
>Gammon Positioning System.
"You are not from around here. Please perform a U-turn when possible and go back to where you came from."
About this 'Taking Back Control'...
I'm not seeing a lot of it. Our gubbermint don't seem to be in control of anything right now.
It was ever thus
Some years ago I was involved in tendering for a logic system to be installed on a European nuclear site.
We took pains to be certain the choice of hardware was not restricted. We asked specific questions and got comfortable answers.
Tendered and lost. Ah well, you win some and you lose some. Move on.
It was only a year or two later I happened across a specification document from the same organisation, which very clearly defined hardware for that kind of application as that from a (inferior) German supplier.
We also have very strong suspicion that it would have made a huge difference if we were a French company.
We were pissed at the bought of being merely bid fodder.
If only someone had warned us!
Tell me more about hotlinks!
It's shocking and unfair, just because the UK renounced it's club membership, it's not allowed club benefits anymore.
For what it's worth, I don't see this changing for many years to come.