UN warns of global e-waste wave as amount of gadgets dumped jumps 21% in 5 years
- Reference: 1593698471
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/07/02/united_nations_warns_of_global_ewaste_wave/
- Source link:
A [1]report from the International Telecommunications Union (ITU), called Global E-waste Monitor 2020, attributed the jump to higher levels of disposable incomes, growing urbanisation and mobility, and further industrialisation in some parts of the world.
The 2019 figures represents 7.3kg of e-waste for every person on the planet and the problem is only swelling thanks to growing consumption of electrical and electronic equipment (EEE) as well as shorter life cycles and increasing difficulty in repairing electronic goods: both issues driven by companies seeking to increase profits and sales.
There is some refurbishment and refuse of electronic goods – mostly from high to low-income countries – but the report notes that a "considerable amount of e-waste is still exported illegally or under the guise of being for reuse or pretending to be scrap metal". It estimates that between 7 and 20 per cent of all e-waste is dumped illegally.
Perhaps more concerning is that the report's authors were unhappy to track what had happened to the vast majority of the e-waste produced: "The fate of 82.6 per cent (44.3 Mt) of e-waste generated in 2019 is uncertain, and its whereabouts and the environmental impact varies across the different regions."
The report estimates that in the 10 years to 2030, the amount of e-waste will have increased to 74.7 million tonnes and double in another six. That waste can often be hazardous thanks to the materials used in modern electronics goods. As one example, an estimated 50 tonnes of mercury — used in monitors, PCBs and fluorescent lights – are dumped annually. Mercury damages the brain if it gets into the body.
More trouble
E-waste also contributes to climate change, with the report estimating that 98 million tonnes of "CO 2 equivalents" were released into the atmosphere from discarded fridges and air conditioners.
While Asia produces the most e-waste overall – 24.9 million tonnes (Mt) a year – Europe is the worst offender when it comes to per capita waste: 16.2kg for every man, woman and child. The Americas produce the third largest amount of waste (13.1Mt) and second largest amount per capita (13.3kg) whereas Oceania comes second with 16.1kg per capita. Africa produces the least e-waste per capita (2.5kg) and in real terms (0.7Mt).
The world's governments are aware of the enormous risks posed by e-waste and the number of countries passing legislation to deal with it is steadily increasing – there are now 78 countries with laws or regulations – but with roughly 200 countries across the globe, it is still far lower than UN goals.
Speaking about the report, UN Under-Secretary-General David Malone warned that the world is not doing enough to deal with the problem of e-waste and that "substantially greater efforts are urgently required to ensure smarter and more sustainable global production, consumption, and disposal of electrical and electronic equipment".
Urgency
He argued that there was a "sense of urgency in turning around this dangerous global pattern".
The director of the ITU's telecoms arm, Doreen Bogdan-Martin, warned that e-waste is "rising three times faster than the world's population and 13 per cent faster than the world's GDP during the last five years".
What are the solutions for tackling e-waste? Aside from trying to get companies to wean themselves off constantly updating their products and to allow consumers to fix and repair their products, one of the best solutions is recycling and recovery – and there may be sufficient economic value in it to make that happen.
The report argues that e-waste is an "urban mine" with precious materials such as iron, copper and gold often present. "With the current documented collection and recycling rate of 17.4 per cent, a raw material value of $10 billion USD is recovered in an environmentally sound way from e-waste globally, and 4 Mt of raw materials could be made available for recycling," the report notes. "The recycling of iron, aluminium, and copper contributed to a net saving of 15 Mt of CO 2 ." ®
Get our [2]Tech Resources
[1] https://www.itu.int/en/mediacentre/Pages/pr10-2020-global-ewaste-monitor.aspx
[2] https://whitepapers.theregister.com/
Re: Someone's confused
I wonder how a corrected ranking would look if they separated South America from North America?
Re: Someone's confused
Not necessarily confused. The per capita figures may be correct, and the total depends on how many people are contributing at the given rate in each nation. We don't have the total for Oceania.
Blame...
...the fruit one called Apple. Making their phones and other kit as unrepairable as possible. And also fighting right to repair.
Re: Blame...
Apple is certainly to blame in part but so is every other manufacturer of E-goods, all of them want you to buy new replacements as often as possible, it's called capitalism, our current system relies on consumerism and obsolete goods in the shortest possible time that they can get away with.
The IoT is currently being pushed so hard because it has the potential to be the 'next big thing' and requires everything to be replaced with 'Smart' versions of what you already have and that works.
Pollution and ever growing piles/landfills of waste will not be solved until we find a better economic model and I am definitely not smart enough to come up with one that everyone would like.
So start legislation...
...to make this junk last more than 13 months? Oh and also make it easier to repair.
I really don't mind paying a bit more if I know I'll definitely get 5 years+ out of an IT item.
Laser printers? Make the fuser unit easy to replace and not charge 90% of the cost of a whole new printer for a replacement unit.
Re: So start legislation...
The fundamental problem is that to keep device prices as they are, churn is essential. Otherwise the revenue dries up.
In the days of mainframes, we leased hardware and paid for maintenance and support. That both provided a continuous revenue stream and allowed the hardware to remain in service for decades, but if you're paying once off to own, either the price has to be very high or the lifespan short. We've chosen the latter option, so there's inevitably a stream of waste, and because technological advances lead to obsolescence recycling has limited potential.
Humans are very good at cornering themselves.
Re: So start legislation...
^ this.
Also re printers, mandate that they use open-standards for their interfacing. It prolly isn't so bad now, but I was miffed a few years back when I had to replace an old Canon LBP simply because it was a "Win-Printer" dating from ~2000 and absolutely would not work with anything other than Win9x or Win2K/XP. No MS-DOS, no Mac and certainly no Linux. And no way to resolve this... I'd spent waaaay too much time naffing around with VMs to keep it going as long as I did!
Also, routers. They should be user-flashable, and again, document stuff so someone might stand a chance of creating an open-source firmware. And they should use standardised PSUs too... just for good measure.
You want to sort
this problem.
Make it law that any battery powered e-device can have its battery changed for a new one by its owner with the minimum of tools (eg a kitchen knife and a hammer),then enshrine right to repair into law too... you paid for the device, its yours to fix/repair/modify as you see fit, and make the manufacturer have to provide parts for the device for 10 yrs after it went out of production
After all.. could you imagine a car market where you HAD to take your car to Ford for new tyres? , where you could'nt have a different exhaust fitted to the one Ford specify? and when the F150 went out of production you couldn't buy any spares for it?
Sadly google and apple will quickly bribe sorry lobby for that sorta law to be squished ASAP
Someone's confused
The Americas produce the third largest amount of waste (13.1Mt) and second largest amount per capita (13.3kg) whereas Oceania comes second with 16.1kg per capita.