IR35 tax reforms for UK freelancers glide through committee stage: D-Day set for 6 April 2021
- Reference: 1592577910
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/06/19/ir35_reforms_slides_through_committee/
- Source link:
Despite a report from the House of Lords calling for a complete rethink of the proposed legislation and a tabled amendment from David Davis MP, attempts to delay and amend the new rules have been thwarted.
The reforms to the IR35 rules make large and medium-sized businesses responsible for determining the employment status of contractors for tax purposes, rather than the contractors themselves doing this. The rules are designed to make contractors deemed to work as staffers pay similar income tax and national insurance contributions to employees. The measure came into effect in the public sector in 2017.
What is IR35?
IR35 is a tax reform that was unveiled in 1999 by the UK tax authorities as part of the a crackdown on so-called disguised employment, where workers behave as employees but avoid paying regular income tax and national income contributions by billing for their services through personal service companies (PSCs), which are taxed at lower corporate rates. The latest regulation change will force medium and large businesses in the UK to set the tax status of their contractors and freelancers. Previously this was set by the contractors themselves.
HMRC reckons that only one in 10 contractors in the private sector who should be paying tax under the current rules are doing so correctly. It estimates the reforms will recoup £1.2bn a year by 2023.
The new rules require assessing whether the contractors meet HMRC's definition of self-employment - criticised by many techie contractors as being variable and difficult to comply with. The controversial Check Employment Status For Tax (CEST) tool provided by the taxman for the purpose has also been criticised by freelancers for giving different results at different times, being susceptible to being "gamed", and for excluding "mutuality of obligation" - the concept that the company is obliged to provide work and the contractor to accept it (which would make them more of an employee).
Critics say that being inside IR35 is essentially "no-rights employment," meaning techies are paid and taxed similarly to regular employees but do not receive any of the security or protections that go along with permanent employment, such as holiday or sick pay, pension, or parental leave. Contractors within IR35 can be hired and fired at will and without reason. On the other hand, some have argued, many are using self-employed tax schemes to avoid tax attracted by their hardworking co-workers.
The measure came into effect in the public sector in 2017. The British government hoped the reforms would recoup £440m by bringing 20,000 contractors in line. The implementation in that area has been [1]described as an "utter shambles."
IT contractors fear companies' assessments of their tax status are not always accurate while the new responsibilities risk scaring firms away from hiring freelancers for fear of the complexities involved. Yet others complain they're being pushed into umbrella companies and PAYE situations, with claims of an "effective pay cut of up to 30 per cent". These issues have led to considerable frustration in the community.
Seb Maley, CEO of IR35 tax advisors Qdos said: “It’s hugely disappointing, albeit unsurprising, that MPs have given the 2021 rollout the green light. For years, the Government has mistakenly been under the impression that contractors abuse the IR35 rules. In our experience, this simply isn’t the case.
“If mismanaged, these changes pose a real threat to contractors, the recruiters who place them and the businesses that engage them. It is vital that companies impacted by IR35 reform continue their preparations and ensure they are in a position to make accurate IR35 decisions well in advance of the implementation date,” he said.
Some companies have introduced blanket bans on use of personal service companies under the rules to avoid any liability and what they may deem as unnecessary HMRC scrutiny.
Contractors took to Twitter to vent their frustrations that the new rules, originally due to be [2]introduced on 6 April this year , are set to come into force without further delay.
"IR35 will be a disaster...everyone can see that except a few Tory loons," [3]one opined .
In April, the UK's House of Lords [4]produced a report on the proposed changes to the off-payroll tax regime which concluded the proposals required a complete rethink.
"The government has not sufficiently analysed the unintended behavioural consequences of the proposed reforms. Contractors are already being laid off, despite the reforms' delay. Many witnesses told the Committee that the rules have made them 'zero-rights employees' with none of the rights of being an employee, or the tax advantages of being self-employed," the report stated.
For its part, the government has said a delay would not address the intrinsic unfairness of taxing two people differently for the same work and would come at financial cost to the exchequer. ®
Sponsored: [5]Modernizing Your .NET Application for Google Cloud Platform
[1] https://www.theregister.com/2017/01/25/gov_advising_it_contractors_to_hike_fees_by_20_per_cent_to_avoid_ir35_exodus/
[2] https://www.theregister.com/2020/03/17/uk_ir35_tax_reform_postponed/
[3] https://twitter.com/andydd_/status/1273942868240076806
[4] https://www.theregister.com/2020/04/27/lords_ir35_report/
[5] https://go.theregister.com/tl/1956/-8473/modernizing-your-net-application-for-google-cloud-platform?td=wptl1956
Re: tl;dr
Much as I have a vested interest in IR35, single-issue politics espoused by Independent candidates gets you nowhere....
"HMRC reckons that only one in 10 contractors in the private sector who should be paying tax under the current rules are doing so correctly."
As advised by its consultants who have a vested interest in supplying contractors to both Government and Commercial projects.
Who is paying the right tax ?
After IR35 how many of those consultants will be paying the correct tax ?
I am thinking of those who are working away from home for a few months but cannot claim travel & hotels against tax - if they were doing the same but working for a large company they would have this paid for them by the company which would claim it against income.
IR35 Status - Furlough Status as Evidence
I would have been unable to claim under the Furlough scheme (as I am fortunate to have enough subcontracting work anyway so no need to furlough anyway), ergo I am either self-employed with turnover >£50k or a limited company director.
What I can't be is an employee (of anybody) since even though I do pay salary under PAYE neither my end-clients nor my Limited company could or would pay out under the Furlough scheme anyway.
Surely being unable to claim under the Furlough scheme is evidence enough of not being a disguised employee?
"The reforms to the IR35 rules make large and medium-sized businesses responsible for determining the employment status of contractors for tax purposes, rather than the contractors themselves doing this."
It should be a fairly simple test: In the great COVID-19 debacle 2020 did you furlough them with the rest of your employees, make them redundant or push them off the sledge because they weren't employees at all and you owed them nothing?
tl;dr
Tory, liebour, and LibDunce MP's are all bastards, and we should vote for independents who will actually represent.