City of Los Angeles sued for tracking rental scooter rides - that's the rideshare company's job says EFF and ACLU
- Reference: 1591661611
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/06/09/los_angeles_scooter_suit/
- Source link:
[1]A complaint [PDF] filed by the American Civil Liberties Union and Electronic Frontier Foundation claims that the city and its department of transportation are violating the Fourth Amendment (unreasonable search and seizure) with their use of tracking software to log the locations and trip times of rental scooters.
At issue is Los Angeles' Mobility Data Specification (MDS), a portal which the City uses to log rental scooter activity on its streets, including scooter locations and trip times. Scooter providers are forced to hand over their trip data to the MDS app as a condition of operating within the city, rather than just paying to hand it over to the rental companies.
"The city is collecting this information, in violation of the Fourth Amendment, as an experiment," [2]said EFF staff attorney Hannah Zhao.
"This is galling and improper, especially at a time when protests are erupting around the country and privacy protections for those exercising their free speech rights on the streets has taken on new importance."
Eggheads have crunched the numbers and the results are in: It's not just your dignity you lose with e-scooters, life and limb are in peril, too [3]READ MORE
The suit notes that the use of MDS started with the noble goal of managing congestion and keeping the rental scooters from blocking sidewalks and otherwise interfering with foot and car traffic in LA. The idea was to be able to see where scooters could be piling up or posing hazards to drivers or pedestrians.
In practice, however, the civil rights groups argue that MDS has become an overly invasive system that illegally tracks citizens as they go about their day-to-day lives.
"Although MDS does not record the identity of the rider directly, the precision with which it captures riders’ location information - often to within a few feet - likely allows riders to be identified," reads the complaint, filed with the Central California US District Court.
"Knowing that a particular trip began at an office building and ended in front of a home, for example, makes the difficulty of identifying the individual rider as simple as knowing their home and work addresses."
With such detailed information available to the city, the groups argue that MDS has become akin to warrantless surveillance and now poses a violation of civil rights. They cite named plaintiffs Justin Sanchez and Eric Alejo, who each took rental scooter rides in LA and had their trips logged.
"Plaintiffs ride electric scooters in the City of Los Angeles, using the vehicles to make trips from their homes to work, friends, businesses, and places of leisure," the complaint reads.
"LA DOT uses MDS to warrantlessly collect sensitive vehicle location data associated with each of plaintiffs’ trips, in violation of their right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures in contravention of the United States and California Constitutions."
The EFF and ACLU are asking the court to issue an injunction that prevents the city from collecting precise location data and requires the DOT to destroy any records of precise location data taken by MDS. It also seeks the usual monetary damages and attorney fees. The LA DOT says it has yet to receive a copy of the complaint.
"We cannot comment on pending litigation, which we also have not seen," a city spokesperson told The Register .
"The department requires reasonable information about shared vehicles operated by for-profit transportation technology companies and remains committed to ensuring the safety and accessibility of our streets."
It should be noted that the scooter companies themselves are not named as defendants in the suit, and it appears they want to stay on the sidelines for this one. El Reg reached out to four of the operators who serve LA (Uber Jump, Bird, Lyft, and Lime) but none had any comment to offer. ®
Sponsored: [4]Running Your Modern .NET Application on Kubernetes
[1] https://www.eff.org/document/sanchez-v-ladot-complaint
[2] https://www.eff.org/press/releases/eff-aclu-file-lawsuit-stop-los-angeles-collecting-real-time-gps-tracking-data
[3] https://www.theregister.com/2020/01/08/electric_scooter_injuries/
[4] https://go.theregister.com/tl/1956/-8477/running-your-modern-net-application-on-kubernetes?td=wptl1956
Re: But they're our streets
I agree with the bulk of your post, all but the last bit. If you desire privacy in your travel then use your own transportation. Use of public transportation (bus, cab, etc) means the ride operator can track the vehicle location as part of providing the ride. Don't like it, don't want to be tracked, then don't use public transportation. The rental company is perfectly within its rights to do any form of tracking on their property, renters desires to the contrary be damned. The fact that the Department of Motor Vehicles is also tracking those vehicles is not a violation of the customers' rights, the rental company can be/probably already is/is actively tracking that vehicle already.
TL;DR: sorry you don't like that rental vehicle being tracked, but it's not a violation of your rights for the rental company nor the DMV to do it. Don't want tracking, use your own personal, owned by you, private vehicle.
Re: But they're our streets
There's ANPR everywhere, and smartphones in a lot of people's pockets. I'd say if you don't want to be tracked you're gonna want to walk or cycle and leave your phone at home or switched off.
As for the EFF's argument, whose job it is to collect and hold that data is moot if the person collecting and holding it has bollocks security.
But they're our streets
Scooters are -- to use traditional English parlance -- a "Mechanically Propelled Vehicle". As such they're regulated by the state's Department of Motor Vehicles. The DMV isn't as anal about tagging everything with a motor as a formal motor vehicle requiring plates, registration and what-have-you but its still a vehicle that's being used on public roads. Our roads. The city isn't being unreasonable monitoring them; they' ahve an interest in local traffic and an organization, LADoT, that manages it (you mostly encounter it giving out parking tickets but it does do a number of other things).
If you desire scooter privacy then scoot in your own private space.