News: 1588847407

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Senior MP tells UK Defence Committee on 5G security: Russia could become China's cyber-attack dog

(2020/05/07)


Russia might begin carrying out cyber attacks against Britain's 5G networks "at the behest of China", the chairman of a Parliamentary Select Committee has ventured.

The startling prediction came from Tobias Ellwood MP, chairman of the Defence Committee, as he presided over a hearing on 5G security and Huawei's involvement.

"I predict that Russia and China, over the next decade, are going to become closer and closer," Ellwood told his committee. "To put it in cruder terms, Russia is going to become more subservient to China." He added: "If Russia understands the weaknesses, the vulnerabilities or the back doors that China provides, it can be Russia continuing to do those cyber attacks at the behest of China."

Giving evidence to the committee were tech venture capitalist Andre Pienaar and Emily Taylor of cyberintel firm Oxford Information Labs. MPs were asking to what extent Huawei's involvement in 5G networks poses a threat to British national security.

Taylor also punched a hole through Huawei's continual denials that its commercial objectives are linked with the Chinese state's objectives, saying: "Mexico was offered a very generous loan on 1 per cent interest, on the condition that 80 per cent of it was spent with Huawei. So we see that technology build-out is very much forming part of the Belt and Road strategy – a patient, sustained strategy that has been conducted over decades."

Pienaar linked Huawei's commercial success to what he described as $75bn of "state aid" from China, apparently citing a [1]Wall Street Journal investigation from December last year. In response to a question from Conservative MP Alicia Kearns, who was a "guest member" of the panel from the Foreign Affairs Committee, Pienaar said: "It is calculated that the Chinese government have financed the growth of Huawei with some $75bn over the past three years to enable it to achieve the kind of market dominance it currently has in telecommunications equipment."

Kearns had asked whether it was important to shut the Chinese comms giant out of the core of the UK's 5G networks. In his answer, Pienaar referenced the 2019 Huawei Cyber Security Evaluation Centre (HCSEC) [2]report , which laid bare Huawei's pisspoor software development practices.

Speculating about why Huawei "are so shoddy in their cybersecurity engineering", he wondered aloud whether Huawei "just do not care about it and it is not important to them", perhaps unfairly adding: "That might be related to the price point at which they sell their product."

Taylor sounded a note of caution over Pienaar's description of Huawei as deliberately deceptive, remarking: "I would not run away with the idea that those faults are deliberately placed in it."

She continued:

Do not forget that Huawei is also providing equipment in other markets, such as China. In cybersecurity, the worst example is when you create a vulnerability and then it is used against you. A vulnerability can be used against anybody who is using the equipment, including the home team, if you like.

Huawei embarked on a [3]short-lived charm offensive after last year's HCSEC report, emphasising how much it spent on cybersecurity.

Overall the committee, not normally known for its ability to uncover original insights, was left with the impression that Huawei is a risk not only to security – as the government has already concluded – but to Britain's relations with key allies America and Australia. Even though Taylor pointed out that it is far easier for Australia and the US to insist on a no-Huawei policy because they have had de facto bans since the early 2010s, this didn't seem to gain much attention.

Although there are [4]targets to cap Huawei's involvement in UK 5G networks at 35 per cent of access layer equipment, there have been murmurings from current Defence Secretary Ben Wallace that this ought to be a [5]much lower target. ®

Bootnote

At one point Ellwood chipped in to describe 5G network topology as composed of four parts, in his understanding: transition networks ("the pipes, if you like"); the core ("which they call the brains, so the encryption, the payments, the tariff and so forth"); the access network ("masts"); and the "management system, which is business support". ®

Sponsored: [6]Forrester Build a Digital Experience Portfolio



[1] https://www.wsj.com/articles/state-support-helped-fuel-huaweis-global-rise-11577280736

[2] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/03/28/hcsec_huawei_oversight_board_savaging_annual_report/

[3] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/02/22/huawei_gchq_security_plan/

[4] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/28/uk_says_yes_to_limited_huawei_non_core/

[5] https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7941967/Defence-Secretary-Ben-Wallace-urged-Boris-Johnson-heed-warnings-Huawei.html

[6] https://go.theregister.co.uk/tl/1936/-8554/forrester-build-a-digital-experience-portfolio?td=wptl1936

Russia and China...

IGotOut

Could become closer and closer.

Well is that because

A) they are both former Communist states, despite having quite a hostile attitude towards each other or

B) the west being hostile to both those, therefore making them look to other markets and working on technologies together.

Hmmmm....

Re: Russia and China...

Chris G

If Elwood thinks Russia is ever likely to become subservient to China, he us too dumb to be even an MP.

Re: Russia and China...

Anonymous Coward

The whole report about MPs discussing 5G puts me in mind of a chimp's tea party discussing nuclear fission.....

The wrong Elwood.

Klimt's Beast Would

I propose the Blues Brothers, even if they are fictional and one of them is dead, would do a better job than these blowhards. At least they were properly entertaining rather than blowing smoke...

Elwood Blues: It’s 106 miles to Chicago, we’ve got a full tank of gas, half a pack of cigarettes, it’s dark and we’re wearing sunglasses.

Jake Blues: Hit it!

Once Again From the Top

Correction notice in the Miami Herald: "Last Sunday, The Herald erroneously
reported that original Dolphin Johnny Holmes had been an insurance salesman
in Raleigh, North Carolina, that he had won the New York lottery in 1982 and
lost the money in a land swindle, that he had been charged with vehicular
homicide, but acquitted because his mother said she drove the car, and that
he stated that the funniest thing he ever saw was Flipper spouting water on
George Wilson. Each of these items was erroneous material published
inadvertently. He was not an insurance salesman in Raleigh, did not win the
lottery, neither he nor his mother was charged or involved in any way with
vehicular homicide, and he made no comment about Flipper or George Wilson.
The Herald regrets the errors."
-- "The Progressive", March, 1987