Brit magistrates' courts turn to video conferencing to keep wheels of justice turning
(2020/05/01)
- Reference: 1588341605
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/05/01/uk_courts_video_conferencing/
- Source link:
Britain's courts are moving to their own video-conferencing platform – for criminal trials rather than business meetings.
The Kinly Cloud Video Platform (CVP) will be used to hear magistrate-level criminal cases, allowing defendants to dial in from the physical safety of their own homes instead of travelling to court buildings.
It will be deployed in 60 magistrates' courts and 48 Crown courts, though Crown court jury trials will not use the platform. So far government and court figures have yet to decide what they will do about jury trials in the post-COVID-19 era.
"So far, HMCTS [Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service] has run 412 remand hearings using CVP, brought online 26 police custody suites, and connected 95 advocates, 42 Crown prosecutors, 20 Probation officers and two translators," the service said in a statement.
Britain's courts have mostly switched to video-conferencing calls in place of physical hearings, with the civil branches of the High Court using a mixture of Skype and Zoom to good effect.
Amanda Pinto QC, chairwoman of barristers' association the Bar Council, said in a statement: "We must keep the justice system going in the public interest. Barristers, along with the judiciary, court staff and many others, are determined to adapt quickly to delivering justice during COVID-19, including delivering it remotely. The new CVP platform is crucial to these efforts, enabling more cases to be heard without everyone having to gather in a physical courtroom."
Deputy chief constable Tony Blaker of Kent Police agreed, chipping in to add: "By holding court hearings remotely during this crisis, we can help to reduce the spread of the virus and ensure that the Criminal Justice System continues to operate effectively."
The move to video conferencing is part of HMCTS's £1.2bn (and counting) [1]Common Platform Programme (CPP), which was intended to include video conferencing to replace some criminal court hearings in costly-to-maintain court buildings. Controversy has mounted over these plans, with the Society of Editors [2]warning that open justice – allowing the public to see how judicial decisions are reached – must not be harmed as a result of video hearings.
Last year HMCTS abandoned a key plank of the CPP, with a case management system being [3]kept in use instead of being replaced as planned . ®
Sponsored: [4]How To Accelerate Brilliant Digital Experiences With Low-Code
[1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/11/01/mps_slam_tech_behind_1bn_court_modernisation_programme/
[2] https://www.societyofeditors.org/soe_news/old-bailey-allows-journalists-to-cover-case-in-legal-first/
[3] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/01/08/ministry_of_justice_it_project/
[4] https://go.theregister.co.uk/tl/1936/-8552/how-to-accelerate-brilliant-digital-experiences-with-low-code?td=wptl1936
The Kinly Cloud Video Platform (CVP) will be used to hear magistrate-level criminal cases, allowing defendants to dial in from the physical safety of their own homes instead of travelling to court buildings.
It will be deployed in 60 magistrates' courts and 48 Crown courts, though Crown court jury trials will not use the platform. So far government and court figures have yet to decide what they will do about jury trials in the post-COVID-19 era.
"So far, HMCTS [Her Majesty's Courts and Tribunals Service] has run 412 remand hearings using CVP, brought online 26 police custody suites, and connected 95 advocates, 42 Crown prosecutors, 20 Probation officers and two translators," the service said in a statement.
Britain's courts have mostly switched to video-conferencing calls in place of physical hearings, with the civil branches of the High Court using a mixture of Skype and Zoom to good effect.
Amanda Pinto QC, chairwoman of barristers' association the Bar Council, said in a statement: "We must keep the justice system going in the public interest. Barristers, along with the judiciary, court staff and many others, are determined to adapt quickly to delivering justice during COVID-19, including delivering it remotely. The new CVP platform is crucial to these efforts, enabling more cases to be heard without everyone having to gather in a physical courtroom."
Deputy chief constable Tony Blaker of Kent Police agreed, chipping in to add: "By holding court hearings remotely during this crisis, we can help to reduce the spread of the virus and ensure that the Criminal Justice System continues to operate effectively."
The move to video conferencing is part of HMCTS's £1.2bn (and counting) [1]Common Platform Programme (CPP), which was intended to include video conferencing to replace some criminal court hearings in costly-to-maintain court buildings. Controversy has mounted over these plans, with the Society of Editors [2]warning that open justice – allowing the public to see how judicial decisions are reached – must not be harmed as a result of video hearings.
Last year HMCTS abandoned a key plank of the CPP, with a case management system being [3]kept in use instead of being replaced as planned . ®
Sponsored: [4]How To Accelerate Brilliant Digital Experiences With Low-Code
[1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/11/01/mps_slam_tech_behind_1bn_court_modernisation_programme/
[2] https://www.societyofeditors.org/soe_news/old-bailey-allows-journalists-to-cover-case-in-legal-first/
[3] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2019/01/08/ministry_of_justice_it_project/
[4] https://go.theregister.co.uk/tl/1936/-8552/how-to-accelerate-brilliant-digital-experiences-with-low-code?td=wptl1936
Re: The elephant in the crown court
Anonymous Coward
The powers that be would love to remove jury trials and this would be the perfect excuse.
Re: The elephant in the crown court
Jimmy2Cows
My tinfoil might be slipping a bit, but... citations...? It's a bold claim, after all.
Trial by Television?
Anonymous Coward
Eh?
Misreading
GrahamRJ
Somehow I read that as the "Kinky Cloud Video Platform". I was wondering about how the judges' sexual preferences were relevant, the presence of bars, cells, chains and handcuffs notwithstanding.
Re: Misreading
Jimmy2Cows
You're not the only one.
Re: Misreading
IGotOut
came to post the same thing.
KinkyCloudVideo.com is free if anyone is wondering.
The elephant in the crown court
must be how to conduct jury selection with 40 members of the public while a jury is assembled, get the defendants into a court (in some cases there could be as many as 20 defendants plus barristers plus solicitors) plus ensure the mentioned right of the press/public to attend every day.
To do this and to ensure that everyone maintains a 2 metre safe distance is going to be a mammoth (excuse the pun) task. One aspect might be to guarantee a defendant a maximum 12 month sentence, thus ensuring that the case could be handled by a judge on his/her own. This could still involve legislation since the right to a jury trial is enshrined in UK law.
Perhaps the use of specially created courts with very large courtroom areas, where all required members can sit in protected transparent booths.