News: 1588060326

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

China strings up red tape barrier that shows businesses they're better off buying local tech

(2020/04/28)


China has implemented new rules for buying tech equipment in a move to bolster the country's cybersecurity.

The new rules, [1]announced yesterday by the Cyberspace Administration of China (CAC), requires "critical information infrastructure operators" to undergo a review for any tech products or services that "affect or may affect" national security".

Under the new rules, companies must submit procurement documents, purchase agreements, and an analysis of the deal's potential national security impact for government review before signing a contract. The review process is expected to take up to 45 working days, but may take up to three months to resolve in more complicated cases.

The regulation's wording says the Chinese government will consider "political, diplomatic, and trade factors" as part of any review.

The review will involve both "pre-examination" and, ominously, "continuous supervision". The CAC did not respond to The Register 's request for clarification of just what those phrases mean.

An obvious consequence of the rules is that Chinese companies might buy local instead of putting themselves at risk of lengthy reviews. If many do so, it will be bad news for foreign tech companies. Many of those come from the USA, which is negotiating new trade arrangements with China after making it very hard for Chinese companies Huawei and ZTE to do business on its soil, or for Chinese companies to use American tech. Today the USA also [2]shook its fist at four Chinese telcos .

Robyn Chatwood, a cybersecurity expert at law firm Dentons, argues that China's attempts to beef up its cybersecurity predate the trade tensions with the US. She points out that the new regulation replaces a set of 2017 trial measures from before the trade wars began, which called for reviews of "supply chain" and "security" risks in production, testing, delivery or technical support.

"The direction of travel in China is about data protection generally. You've certainly got that background context of the trade war," Chatwood said. "But I don't think the regulation is targeting anyone - it's just that the US dominates these areas so it impacts them the most heavily."

Jim Fitzsimmons, a director at cyber consultancy at Control Risks, agreed. "They were going to do this anyway," he said. "This is part of a bigger programme. The motivation behind all these things is how poor cybersecurity is in China. The government has identified this as a strategic risk and these are all the things they're trying to do to fix it."

He argued that China's policies are not so different from other countries'. "Any country when they think of their own [critical information infrastructure], they want to make sure they're doing the right thing around protecting and evaluating so they're not introducing risk to their system. But some countries are further down the road and more explicit. China is different in how it presents these things and put these things forward."

The Chinese government defines critical information infrastructure operators loosely to include energy, telecommunications, transportation, finance, defense, military, administrative management, as well as cloud computing, big data, and the Internet of Things.

The new policy comes into effect from June 1. The previous regulations can be found [3]here . ®

Sponsored: [4]Legacy Modernization: Finding Your Way With Low-Code



[1] http://www.cac.gov.cn/2020-04/27/c_1589535450769077.htm

[2] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/28/fcc_chinese_telcos/

[3] http://www.cac.gov.cn/2017-05/02/c_1120904567.htm

[4] https://go.theregister.co.uk/tl/1936/-8553/legacy-modernization-finding-your-way-with-low-code?td=wptl1936

"political, diplomatic, and trade factors"

Anonymous Coward

Read: The Chinese government's ability to surveil/control.

Re: "political, diplomatic, and trade factors"

Chris G

So not at all like the PATRIOT act or the UK's RIPA and it's successor or Australia dismantling the laws of mathematics and Canada evesdropping on it's citizens, to name just a few.

Re: "political, diplomatic, and trade factors"

Anonymous Coward

I do not recall implying anything but a mincing of words.

Re: "political, diplomatic, and trade factors"

AConcernedCitizen

>Australia dismantling the laws of mathematics

The Commutative, Associative or Distributive Laws?

Re: "political, diplomatic, and trade factors"

BebopWeBop

Chapeu

Re: "political, diplomatic, and trade factors"

bombastic bob

"The Commutative, Associative or Distributive Laws?"

Now I can hear Tom Lehrer's "New Math" in my head...

What goes around comes around

Pascal Monett

When you go around shrieking about how a Chinese company puts your comm infrastructure at risk without any proof whatsoever, and try to strong-arm everybody else to "trust" you just because, well you can hardly be surprised that China, in turn, takes your arguments at face value and sets its own comms infrastructure rules down.

Except that China doesn't have to go shrieking that Cisco is beholden to the NSA, everybody knows that - and there's proof.

Re: What goes around comes around

Tubz

Always thought Cisco HQ was in the NSA basement or is it the CIA cloakroom?

TeeCee

The CAC did not respond to The Register's request...

Aha! Proof that China is a wholly owned subsidiary of Apple.

Except...

Ragarath

Apple did reply to The Reg a few weeks ago about something. Can't remember the article but I'm sure they did!

Please help me out someone; it may be that I have gone mad?

BebopWeBop

I wonder whether they are getting their reparations for retaliation in early?

analyzer

Unlikely, the US has become a very 'fragile' trading partner over the last few years. It no longer wants to do business with the rest of the world unless we bow down and kiss your current incompetents feet, sorry meant incumbents there but it still fits.

China is just pointing out that they require certainty and security of supply neither of which the US can ensure. This is noteworthy because it is being done at a national level but there are many firms who are investigating possible escape from US made critical infrastructure.

This is what happens when a lying, cheating, untrustworthy guttersnipe of the lowest scum level possible gets elected to lead the largest economy on the planet.

There's no use in having a dog and doing your own barking.