Saving your battery as well as your privacy? New Brave for Android claims 5% power reduction
(2020/04/08)
- Reference: 1586350214
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/08/saving_your_battery_as_well/
- Source link:
Brave has updated its Android web browser and claims a 5 per cent battery saving versus the previous release.
The new release is version 1.5.120, already available in the Play Store, which has been "completely rebuilt over the past few months", according to the [1]company . Brave also said the code repository is now shared between the mobile and desktop versions, a unified codebase that will enable "easier implementations of features". Brave continues to be based on the Google-sponsored [2]Chromium project .
[3]
Brave claims its Android browser will improve your battery life
Does a web browser have much influence on power consumption? According to mobile solution company Greenspector: "Web browsing and social networks are on average more [power] consuming than games or multimedia applications."
In its [4]December 2019 test , the worst-performing Android browser for power consumption (Opera Mini) consumed nearly double the mAh of the best performing (Ecosia). Firefox comes out badly in its results, though the new Firefox Preview is much improved, while the ubiquitous Chrome browser is among the better performers. The issue with Opera Mini is that it uses a proxy to compress the size of websites, but the unpacking operation on the mobile device consumes power.
[5]
Energy consumption by Android browsers [chart from Greenspector]
Greenspector's overall ranking, which ranks Vivaldi best and Firefox worst, also takes into account data consumption and performance. Data consumption varies according to cache usage and features like the extent of the search that takes place when navigating.
Brave said its new version uses 3 per cent less data than its previous version. Privacy and energy usage may go hand in hand, since blocking intrusive advertisements and trackers also reduces the data transferred. Multimedia auto-play is another data transfer hog.
The company performed tests by sequentially loading the top 10 news sites and simulating user behaviour by scrolling up and down a few times. The tests were done on a Samsung Galaxy J3 running Android 9.0, on what the company described as "a fast Wi-Fi network in North America".
In truth, the figures are somewhat arbitrary. A large chunk of the saving came from a change in auto-play behaviour, which reduced the bandwidth of one of the websites in the test by nearly 30 per cent. Brave also tested against the 717 sites selected from Alexa's top 1,000 and it is hard to tell from its report which figures are based on the 10 news sites, and which on the larger number. The answer is not to pay too much attention to the exact figures, but rather to note that the choice of web browser, blocking technology and the type of sites visited all have a significant impact on power consumption.
The browser maker has incorporated power consumption into its Continuous Integration (CI) process, using measurements from [6]BatteryLab , a battery measurement platform created by Brave in association with Imperial College London and Northwestern University. ®
Sponsored: [7]Legacy Modernization: Finding Your Way With Low-Code
[1] https://brave.com/rebuilt-brave-android/
[2] https://www.chromium.org/
[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/08/brave.jpg
[4] https://greenspector.com/en/what-are-the-best-web-browsers-to-use-in-2020/
[5] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/08/energy.jpg
[6] https://batterylab.dev/
[7] https://go.theregister.co.uk/tl/1936/-8553/legacy-modernization-finding-your-way-with-low-code?td=wptl1936
The new release is version 1.5.120, already available in the Play Store, which has been "completely rebuilt over the past few months", according to the [1]company . Brave also said the code repository is now shared between the mobile and desktop versions, a unified codebase that will enable "easier implementations of features". Brave continues to be based on the Google-sponsored [2]Chromium project .
[3]
Brave claims its Android browser will improve your battery life
Does a web browser have much influence on power consumption? According to mobile solution company Greenspector: "Web browsing and social networks are on average more [power] consuming than games or multimedia applications."
In its [4]December 2019 test , the worst-performing Android browser for power consumption (Opera Mini) consumed nearly double the mAh of the best performing (Ecosia). Firefox comes out badly in its results, though the new Firefox Preview is much improved, while the ubiquitous Chrome browser is among the better performers. The issue with Opera Mini is that it uses a proxy to compress the size of websites, but the unpacking operation on the mobile device consumes power.
[5]
Energy consumption by Android browsers [chart from Greenspector]
Greenspector's overall ranking, which ranks Vivaldi best and Firefox worst, also takes into account data consumption and performance. Data consumption varies according to cache usage and features like the extent of the search that takes place when navigating.
Brave said its new version uses 3 per cent less data than its previous version. Privacy and energy usage may go hand in hand, since blocking intrusive advertisements and trackers also reduces the data transferred. Multimedia auto-play is another data transfer hog.
The company performed tests by sequentially loading the top 10 news sites and simulating user behaviour by scrolling up and down a few times. The tests were done on a Samsung Galaxy J3 running Android 9.0, on what the company described as "a fast Wi-Fi network in North America".
In truth, the figures are somewhat arbitrary. A large chunk of the saving came from a change in auto-play behaviour, which reduced the bandwidth of one of the websites in the test by nearly 30 per cent. Brave also tested against the 717 sites selected from Alexa's top 1,000 and it is hard to tell from its report which figures are based on the 10 news sites, and which on the larger number. The answer is not to pay too much attention to the exact figures, but rather to note that the choice of web browser, blocking technology and the type of sites visited all have a significant impact on power consumption.
The browser maker has incorporated power consumption into its Continuous Integration (CI) process, using measurements from [6]BatteryLab , a battery measurement platform created by Brave in association with Imperial College London and Northwestern University. ®
Sponsored: [7]Legacy Modernization: Finding Your Way With Low-Code
[1] https://brave.com/rebuilt-brave-android/
[2] https://www.chromium.org/
[3] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/08/brave.jpg
[4] https://greenspector.com/en/what-are-the-best-web-browsers-to-use-in-2020/
[5] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/08/energy.jpg
[6] https://batterylab.dev/
[7] https://go.theregister.co.uk/tl/1936/-8553/legacy-modernization-finding-your-way-with-low-code?td=wptl1936
Re: Autoplay Videos
Pete B
With you on that one - happily I'm using firefox at the moment and changing the config has stopped it autoplaying without having to resort to using element zapper. UBO is blocking 22% of requests on this very page though. Seems like El Reg doesn't practice what it preaches.
MuckerDog
I use a vpn on my phone for everything except banking, uses far more juice than anything else but luckily I've a 5500mah battery on mine and I still get 12-15hrs sot between charges.
As for Brave, do they still whitelist the likes of Facebook ? I might give them a try if they aren't still speaking with forked tongue and 'mental reservation'.
Autoplay Videos
Like the one on the front page of this very organ?
I've had to use the element zapper in uBlock to kill the bloody thing. Very poor from El Reg here, it's not as if you're unaware of how much people in general (and Reg readers in particular) despise those things.
It's not often I'll slate this site, but things like that just work to make the world a shitter place.