News: 1586336405

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Microsoft attempts to up its Teams game with new features while locked-down folk flock to rival Zoom... warts and all

(2020/04/08)


Microsoft is rolling out improvements to its Teams collaboration software, while no doubt eyeing the success of Zoom in capturing millions of new video-conferencing users as much of the world endures lockdown.

Five new features are coming to users shortly. The first is "background effects", the ability to customise your background from a selection of Microsoft-provided images. There is no reference in the announcement to using your own background images though one user reckons they have [1]worked it out by putting a custom image in a special uploads folder hidden in AppData.

Next up is the ability to call consumer Skype users from Teams and vice versa. This is off by default but can be enabled in a Teams organisation. It [2]appears , though, that this is text and voice only, not video. If that seems messy, there are [3]hints here that the company has plans for Teams to take the place of Skype even in the consumer world.

[4]

Changing the background in Teams is a new menu option, 'Show background effects'

Microsoft describes "new features coming to Microsoft Teams for your personal life" and how a single app would let you not only make personal video calls but also "share grocery lists, organize across family calendars, store important information like Wi-Fi passwords and account info, and even see location updates when loved ones arrive home". This may be reserved for users with a Microsoft 365 personal subscription, though, leaving Skype as the service for general use and continuing to cause confusion.

Third, the "Meet now" buttons in a Teams channel are moving to the top right of the screen. Big deal, you may think, but Microsoft calls this a "new experience for launching instant channel meetings". Fourth, there is a new landing page for users joining a Teams meeting from a link, which will offer a choice between continuing in the browser, opening the Teams app, or downloading the Teams app. Fifth, multi-window chat will mean you can have chat conversations in separate windows. Lastly, there is an increase in the limit on team membership from 5,000 to 10,000 users.

More stuff is also meant to be coming later in April, including checklists and polls, control over the announcement sound when a dial-in user joins or leaves a meeting, and the ability to share email from Outlook to a Teams channel or chat, and to share a Teams conversation by email.

[5]

Top Teams ask on Uservoice is better support for multiple videos

While these may be handy little improvements, users have more pressing issues. The top ask right now is to [6]show video for more than four people in a meeting . If you are meeting online, it helps to see how people are reacting to what you are discussing, not just to see the face of the current speaker. Microsoft said it is working on it and told users to "stay tuned for updates."

Next up is the common requirement to log into multiple accounts, trivial with Slack. In Microsoft's world there are two separate aspects to this. One is where you have signed in with a specific Azure AD identity that has been given guest access to Teams in other organisations, while the other is where you have more than one Azure AD identity that you want to use. The first case is already partially handled in the Windows client, with "fast tenant switching". The other is currently not supported on the desktop but does work in the iOS and Android mobile apps. Teams also still lacks a sane way to integrate with a shared calendar.

Teams has become a critical part of Office 365 in a relatively short time (it was announced in November 2016.) Under the covers it combines features from several different products, including SharePoint, Exchange, Azure AD and Skype for Business. It is also an app platform, with support for custom apps as well as a built-in marketplace which is now extensive (including apps from competitors like Zoom.) This ability to provide a portal into multiple aspects of Office 365 is a key strength, but also a weakness in that it adds complexity versus alternatives that are dedicated to a single purpose.

Zoom conferencing is one such alternative. It is a single product for both business and consumers, and focuses on ease of use above all else – including at times security and engineering best practice. On the Mac, Zoom until recently used a [7]misleading "System" dialog to get root privileges – behaviour normally characteristic of malware. Zoom security issues include lack of end-to-end encryption, and default to passwordless meetings that others can invade (now fixed). That has not stopped Zoom usage exploding, with a reported increase from 10 million daily uses in December 2019, to [8]over 200 million today , caused by the lockdown. But it ticks boxes for easy install, key features like screen sharing, one-click meeting recording, and simple file sharing between participants.

[9]

Zoom's shady 'System' dialog used until recently on the Mac installer

Microsoft, by contrast, has a number of security and compliance features built into Teams and is [10]bragging about them . The fact that it is composed of longstanding enterprise applications like SharePoint and Azure AD works in its favour in this respect. You can enforce two-factor authentication, set conditional access policies, and apply retention policies to channels, chats and attachments. Teams data is encrypted in transit and at rest. There are mitigations for [11]common threats . Earlier this month, New York City's Department of Education disallowed use of Zoom for its 1.1 million students and teachers, [12]citing "the safety and security of our staff and students" and suggesting Teams or Google Meet as alternatives.

[13]

Compliance diagram for Teams chats

Zoom security concerns have [14]not deterred prominent users and it may be easier for the outfit to [15]improve its security than for Microsoft to match Zoom's usability. Microsoft has made a solid effort to improve Skype through the introduction of [16]instant conferencing with no sign-up, but that will not help Teams users.

Microsoft has been working for years on real-time communications with Skype, already a household name when acquired in 2011, and the Lync/Skype for Business product, which was [17]launched in 2010 . It has spent too much time rearranging the icons on Skype and confusing customers about the difference between Skype, Skype for Business and Teams, and too little on creating a unified, solid and easy-to-use conferencing and collaboration platform.

[18]

Zoom is top, but in sixth place Teams is still huge

Teams is nevertheless an asset for the company, and has strained but not broken in the recent surge of usage. Video conferencing is only one part of its feature set. But the pressure is on to speed up the pace of satisfying long-standing user requirements and to resolve the puzzle of integrating its consumer and business technologies where appropriate, as it has done with OneDrive with considerable success. ®

Sponsored: [19]Legacy Modernization: Finding Your Way With Low-Code



[1] https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams/teams-video-call-custom-backgrounds-release-date/m-p/1285835/highlight/true#M51751

[2] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/teams-skype-interop

[3] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2020/03/30/introducing-new-microsoft-365-personal-family-subscriptions/

[4] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/07/background.jpg

[5] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/07/showvideo.png

[6] https://microsoftteams.uservoice.com/forums/555103-public/suggestions/17010055-show-video-for-all-people-in-video-meeting

[7] https://twitter.com/c1truz_/status/1244737672930824193

[8] https://blog.zoom.us/wordpress/2020/04/01/a-message-to-our-users/

[9] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/07/zoom-system-small.jpg

[10] https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/blog/2020/04/06/it-professionals-privacy-security-microsoft-teams/

[11] https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/microsoftteams/teams-security-guide

[12] https://www.law360.com/technology/articles/1260770/nyc-schools-drop-zoom-as-privacy-security-scrutiny-grows

[13] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/07/compliance-small.jpg

[14] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/01/zoom_spotlight/

[15] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/03/zoom_security_improvements/

[16] https://www.skype.com/en/free-conference-call/

[17] https://news.microsoft.com/speeches/chris-capossela-gurdeep-singh-pall-microsoft-lync-launch/

[18] https://regmedia.co.uk/2020/04/07/topapps.jpg

[19] https://go.theregister.co.uk/tl/1936/-8553/legacy-modernization-finding-your-way-with-low-code?td=wptl1936

Craig 2

Ooooh... top new "feature" you can change the background! Plus what sounds like a kludgy hack to get it partially working with Skype. Honestly, if they stopped re-inventing stuff every 6 months they might stand a chance of having something stable and feature-rich. Sigh.

Windows?

Aoyagi Aichou

Would be nice if it had this feature called "separate windows". Perhaps Microsoft has heard of it.

Mr Humbug

Funny you should mention that. The Office365 message centre has this:

New Feature: Multi-Window Chat for Microsoft Teams

MC207218, Stay Informed, Published date: 21 Mar 2020

Updated March 23, 2020: The initial roll-out will be for Windows clients only. We will provide support for Mac and Linux clients in the coming weeks.

Multi-Window Chat is a new Microsoft Teams feature which enables users to multitask more efficiently by popping out their chat conversations into separate windows.

We'll begin roll-out to all customers starting in early April and expect to complete the roll-out by the end of May.

tin 2

Anyone think that the software engineers at MS sit there doing nothing all day?

MatthewSt

No, they just sit there rewriting stuff that was previously working into the latest and greatest* frameworks

* Definitions may vary

Pub replacement

John Sager

A few of us have a regular pub session on a Friday & that has now moved to Teams, as one of our number gave us all logins, & I downloaded the Linux client. Since the chat is often techy we've used it to share docs & diagrams. Of course favourite tipples are consumed as well!

Re: Pub replacement

MiguelC

We are going to start doing that also... except the organizer didn't remember that he set the first meeting on Good Friday. I don't predict a great number of participants.

Re: helps to see how people are reacting ... not just ... the current speaker.

Captain Hogwash

Same problem with Webex, which seems to be our company's conferencing software of choice (although we also have Teams & Skype for Business.)

Teams makes me sad

Zippy´s Sausage Factory

I never actually thought it would be possible to make me miss Skype for Business. And yet, such a thing has happened.

All those billions spent in Skype

SecretSonOfHG

How to spend 8.5 billion dollars on something only to throw it away in a matter of less than ten years. Just when they managed to get out a half decent Linux version (half because for some reason outgoing calls have sound issues that incoming calls do not have...)

Re: All those billions spent in Skype

druck

They spent about the same on Nokia and threw it away in a year, and before that with Aquantive which was supposed to help them become the next Google.

Coronavirus Asteroid strike

Anonymous Coward

wipes out Microsoft Dinosaur.

Zoom's USP

Charlie Clark

Is that it is currently "free" to use even for large groups: Skype and Hangouts are limited to 10 users per telco for the free versions; you need a paid Microsoft acccount to start a Teams call. If Microsof wants market share it should either have a usable free version of Teams, or, allow more people on Skype calls.

Re: Zoom's USP

MatthewSt

Ask and ye shall receive

Skype - https://www.skype.com/en/free-conference-call/ - Free (very recently without an account needed), 50 people per call (I think, can't find that number again now)

Teams - https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/microsoft-teams-blog/introducing-a-free-version-of-microsoft-teams/ba-p/214592 - Free (since 2018) for up to 300 people per account

Used both

Anonymous Coward

Used teams and zoom, and the lag in zoom has been awful, the interface sucks on the consumer one (though to be fair i'm comparing the fat teams client).

Teams was bumpy in the first few days of the lockdown, but is working brilliantly for us - your mileage may vary, however.

I've even passed an executive order (BOFH) that the minions can use it for personal stuff out of hours.

Re: Used both

Dan 55

Well you've convinced me, Anonymous poster who may or may not be a MS PR person.

Re: Used both

MiguelC

I don't have a bad experience with Zoom, I use it mainly for its higher video quality, but Teams integrates with all our environment (mostly O365) so it's more practical for everything else.

Teams video conference view

A Non e-mouse

Since we rolled out Teams across our organisation we've inundated with requests for Zoom so people can see everyone in a meeting.

We spoke to our Microsoft account team and it was hinted that Microsoft just don't have the compute power to handle more video streams on screen at once at the minute.

Re: Teams video conference view

Dan 55

Perhaps they should look at the original Skype they acquired which used some witchcraft called P2P instead of having to route everything to Redmond via Utah.

Re: Teams video conference view

MatthewSt

Was less witchcraft, and more "whoever started the call was responsible for the relaying". So you'd need to organise it so that that person had the fastest computer / bandwidth

More than four concurrent videos

Flak

Yes, please.

I don't need a choice of backgrounds or sounds.

Teams has come a long way in the last 18 months and we use it daily, often several times, without any issues.

Re: More than four concurrent videos

malfeasance

I regard Teams as primarily a business tool; my line in the sand would be: If you have > 4 people in a meeting, it's not a meeting anymore; it's just a hot-air balloon being inflated.

Sure; I get that stuff is nuanced, but for most business use cases, Teams will work fine (as will any of the other tools).

I've worked remotely for nigh on 20 years, and after the novelty of it all; it's all about asynchronous communications; it's all about being precise in your communications (bearing in mind all the the filler words that english has and how useless they are, relatively speaking - look I've used a bunch in typing this comment).

It's nice to have a choice isn't it?

There are certain things men must do to remain men.
-- Kirk, "The Ultimate Computer", stardate 4929.4