Where's the best place to add Mentos to Diet Coke for the most foam? How big are the individual bubbles? Has science gone too far?
- Reference: 1585936930
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/03/coke_mentos_research/
- Source link:
A chemistry professor and a high school teacher climbed mountains and hiked across deserts in America to find the perfect spot to spike bottles of Diet Coke with Mentos.
“I decided to do these experiments because I not only love the Diet Coke and Mentos experiment, but I have been studying all about it for 15 years now,” Tom Kuntzleman, a chemistry professor at Spring Arbor University, Michigan, told The Register this week.
This made me wonder if the decreased air pressure at higher elevation allowed the experiment to work better
“A few years ago I did the Coke and Mentos experiment at a friend’s house who lived at 6,000-feet elevation in Colorado. I was surprised at how well it worked compared to my normal experience. I live in Michigan at about 1,000-feet elevation. This made me wonder if the decreased air pressure at higher elevation allowed the experiment to work better.”
The chewy confectionery acts as a catalyst, accelerating the release of carbon dioxide dissolved in the fizzy drink as a gas in a process known as nucleation. This rapid production of CO 2 gas bubbles, particularly after the candy has sunk to the bottom of the bottle, forces the liquid out of the coke bottle, and [1]forms a Coca-Cola geyser . It's a physical rather than a chemical reaction.
Now, the aforementioned duo have gathered enough data to figure out the equation that measures the critical size of the bubbles that have to form on the piece of candy to create the frothy eruption. They have to be larger than 3μm – any smaller and they won’t grow big enough to rise up and out of the bottle.
Drink beer not fizzy pop for pity's sake, say boffins [2]READ MORE
Fizzy drinks including Diet Coke are pumped with carbon dioxide and sealed under pressure. Cracking open a can of the stuff releases that pressure and some of the CO 2 dissolved in the sweet liquid makes its way back out as gas, creating the hissing sound. Most of it stays inside the drink, creating the tingling foamy sensation when it’s consumed.
Adding a Mentos candy to the Diet Coke causes more carbon dioxide to escape. The rocky surface of the candy has countless little cavities to trap little bubbles of gas, giving them a space to accumulate until they become buoyant enough to float to the surface. After each bubble escapes, another forms in its wake; the process is repeated numerous times to create a powerful release of carbon dioxide gas. This is amusing to many internet users.
Kuntzleman and his school teacher colleague Ryan Johnson teamed up to see if higher altitudes did indeed produce more powerful soda geysers. Johnson trekked up Pikes Peak, part of the Rocky Mountain range in Colorado 14,108 feet above sea level, and recorded his results.
Meanwhile, Kuntzleman drove across the Death Valley desert, 43 feet below sea level, and up Mount Mitchell, the highest peak in the Appalachian Mountains, 6,638 feet above sea level to perform more experiments.
"If you only count Diet Coke, Mentos, and materials associated with running the experiments it probably cost around $150," Kuntzleman said. "If you start factoring in travel, payment for entrance to national and state parks, cost of gas… I’d rather not think about it."
The Diet Coke bottles were kept at 27 degrees Celsius (80.6 degrees Fahrenheit). Each one produced much more foam at higher elevations, likely due to lower air pressures that allow the bubbles to expand more easily, though that explanation is not confirmed.
The duo measuring the foam output at a low altitude, left, and high altitude. Credit: Kuntzleman and Johnson
The study has been [3]published in the Journal of Chemical Education. While it may not be Nobel Prize worthy research, Kuntzleman said the experiment is still a neat way of demonstrating fundamental processes like the ideal gas law.
“Because I’m a chemistry teacher, I find the results to be very useful in my classroom. For example, the Diet Coke and Mentos experiment is strongly related to how CO 2 gas pressure affects the amount of CO 2 that dissolves in water," he told us.
"Therefore, discussing the results of my Coke and Mentos experiments provides a great platform to introduce students to various impacts such as ocean acidification associated with increased CO 2 in the atmosphere from burning fossil fuels.” ®
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LjbJELjLgZg
[2] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/02/08/beer_not_pop/
[3] https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acs.jchemed.9b01177
The Diet Coke bottles were kept at 27 degrees Celsius (80.6 degrees Fahrenheit)
Maybe someone who knows a bit of the old science magic stuff could explain the choice of temperature and whether or not different temperatures would change the result.
efficient insertion of Mentos is key
I built a screw on adapter out of a bottle cap, with a drilled out centre and attached a vertical plastic tube witha a small transverse hole for a metal pin. Screw on adapter, insert pin, load tube with Mentos. Stand clear, pull cord to remove pin.
The resulting geyser was captured on video for the wife's middle school science class.
It worked so well, some kid stole it when she demoed it at school!
Cool waste of time
Cool that they got to see new places, but aren't there lots of variables that were ignored? Moisture content of the mentos in different altitudes and temperatures. Did they buy all of the soda and mentos at the same time, same batches? And as mentioned above, why that specific temperature at different altitudes?
I know enough about scientific process to ask dumb questions...
Diet Coke?
Yeah well, it doesn't sound as much fun as we had as we had, back around 1958. All we has to do was drop an aspirin in a bottle of coke, to have fun. fun, fun. Oh never mind.
Been wondering...
Why specifically "Diet" coke?
Is there something about Sugar (or HFCS, or Manitol, or...) that changes the behavior?
As David 132 remarked, this is more a physics thing than a chemical reaction, so I'd expect, e.g. Seltzer to work as well. So why a particular witch's brew of artificial sweeteners?
Yes, I can understand the benefit to society at large from one less bottle of that vile brew finding its way into a human digestive system.
Re: Been wondering...
My 12 year old grand-daughter recently investigated this as her science project.
Evidently the type of sweetener used in Diet Coke is Aspartame.
So she dissolved increasing amounts of a standard aspartame based sweetener into bottles of lemonade.
Then dropped a standard sized Mento into the mixture and measured the height of the resulting foam plume.
Her conclusion: The greater the concentration of aspartame in the solution, the higher the resulting plume.
It maybe that the nucleation is a physics effect, but the actual constituents of the solution can either increase or decrease the speed of the reaction
Wrong science discipline.
This isn't chemistry, it's fizz-ics.