Zoom vows to spend next 90 days thinking hard about its security and privacy after rough week, meeting ID war-dialing tool emerges
- Reference: 1585899731
- News link: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/03/zoom_security_improvements/
- Source link:
The pledge came in a [2]memo to customers from CEO Eric S. Yuan, in which he said: “Over the next 90 days, we are committed to dedicating the resources needed to better identify, address, and fix issues proactively. We are also committed to being transparent throughout this process. We want to do what it takes to maintain your trust.”
The company said it has, amid the coronavirus pandemic forcing people around the world to work from home, seen its daily user numbers soar from 10 million in December to now 200 million. And with that increase, it's experienced a shed load of scrutiny from the media and information security types. In response to the shortcomings uncovered, Zoom has promised to:
Enact a feature freeze, effectively immediately, and shifting all our engineering resources to focus on our biggest trust, safety, and privacy issues.
Conduct a comprehensive review with third-party experts and representative users to understand and ensure the security of all of our new consumer use cases.
Prepare a transparency report that details information related to requests for data, records, or content.
Enhance our current bug bounty program.
Launch a CISO council in partnership with leading CISOs from across the industry to facilitate an ongoing dialogue regarding security and privacy best practices.
Engage in a series of simultaneous white box penetration tests to further identify and address issues.
Host a weekly webinar on Wednesdays at 10am PT to provide privacy and security updates to our community.
The developer has already fixed a Mac installer that [3]behaved badly and other security flaws. It also removed the creepy attention-tracking feature that alerted meeting hosts if a participant clicked away from the app for too long.
However, the engineers now focused on security clearly have their work cut out. Last year, Check Point [4]documented how it was easy to brute-force guess Zoom meeting ID numbers, which could be used to gatecrash non-password-protected conferences. In response, Zoom made creating a password a default setting, thwarting ID brute-forcing.
Unfortunately, miscreants keep Zoombombing virtual meetings, pasting in porno and other nonsense. So much so, Zoom [5]published advice on how to keep uninvited morons out of private conferences. This week, the biz admitted to infosec journo Brian Krebs that this password-protected-by-default feature [6]may not be working as intended, leaving people's meetings exposed.
In short, follow the advice to set a password, and don't publicly share those credentials, and do set limits on individual participants.
Tech won't save you from lockdown disaster: How to manage family and free time while working from home [7]READ MORE
Meanwhile, Krebs has been in touch with someone who has automated that meeting ID brute-forcing process. That someone is Trent Lo, a security professional and co-founder of Kansas City security meetup SecKC.
“Lo and fellow SecKC members recently created zWarDial, which borrows part of its name from the old phone-based war dialing programs that called random or sequential numbers in a given telephone number prefix to search for computer modems,” Krebs explained. And zWarDial found about 100 open meetings each hour.
Which shouldn’t be possible, because Zoom is supposed to apply a password by default, indicating perhaps there’s a scenario in which passwords aren't created by default. Or perhaps Zoom has so many meetings now, some are bound to have their passwords switched off by hosts to make life easier.
At least Zoom has a share price that’s above its early 2020 level, something not many listed companies can boast right now. It's standing at $121.93 apiece versus $68.72 on January 1. A Chinese company called Zoom Technologies also enjoyed a surge in investment after buyers mistook its $ZOOM ticker symbol for Zoom's $ZM. America's financial watchdog, the SEC, suspended trading of the Chinese company’s stock to stop that silliness. ®
[1] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/04/01/zoom_spotlight/
[2] https://blog.zoom.us/wordpress/2020/04/01/a-message-to-our-users/
[3] https://objective-see.com/blog/blog_0x56.html
[4] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/01/28/zoom_eavesdrop_hack/
[5] https://blog.zoom.us/wordpress/2020/03/20/keep-uninvited-guests-out-of-your-zoom-event/
[6] https://krebsonsecurity.com/2020/04/war-dialing-tool-exposes-zooms-password-problems/
[7] https://www.theregister.co.uk/2020/03/21/home_working_register_guide/
This. With webex it was easy, when you started a meeting as host you had to give a password, it could be different for each meeting. Zoom makes it a real PITA to do. You can set a default password for your personal room, but once that becomes common knowledge it serves little purpose. They need to add a way to easily choose a password each time you host a call.
It is easy - it's just below the date/time settings...
I really fancy a Lyons Maid lolly now.
I really fancy a Lyons Maid lolly now.
Keep quiet about it. Walls have ears.
I know, I found one in my Cornetto!
A Chinese company called Zoom Technologies also enjoyed a surge in investment after buyers mistook its $ZOOM ticker symbol for Zoom's $ZM.
Ah, the invisible hand strikes again.
Anyone else...
... hear the Fat Larry's Band track in their head every time this service/app is mentioned?
Re: Anyone else...
I do now. D:
To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
I've had to. In a five-way Skype videocall, two people couldn't see two other people's video, the feedback was horrendous, and one person got dropped. That was after it took about an of hour messing about for two people to add each other to their contact list even knowing their Skype ID (not e-mail address).
How did Microsoft manage to turn Skype into such a turd?
Re: To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
"How did Microsoft manage to turn Skype into such a turd?"
Is this a rhetorical question?
Re: To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
It's end of life, due to die 2021 for business, not sure about consumer version.
Re: To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
The same way Cisco made Webex such a turd?
Zoom isn't by any means perfect. It just a damn sight better in UX than any other of the Virtual meeting tools out there.
Re: To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
Give Microsoft a month or so and they'll buy Zoom and we'll have Zoom meetings for Teams and in 5 months time Teams will be chargable to everyone.
Re: To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
and they'll make zoom rubbish somehow.
Re: To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
Why did you need 5 simultaneous video streams? I try and hide these whenever I'm on calls where people have the camera running. It would be nice if you could easily switch off incoming video feeds.
Used Skype a lot recently and quality has generally been okay but I think a lot will depend on the network traffic on whichever server is doing the mixing of feed.
Re: To be honest you can't blame people for going to Zoom
Er, family. Contrary to popular belief I wasn't hewn from rock.
90 Days?
By then, the lockdown is hopefully going to be eased. At that point Zoom traffic is going to plummet as people realise video conferencing while working from home is just Internet Presenteeism.
I wish I had the nerve and capital reservers to short Zoom stock.
Re: 90 Days?
If it's a sure fire bet when do you need reserves?
Re: 90 Days?
That's how shorting works - you need the margin.
Re: 90 Days?
Assuming the lockdowns do get eased, It's gonna plummet, but not going to the levels it was, now people have been forced to make videoconferencing work of sorts. A significant percentage of companies and/or of meeting organisers are going to realise it really doesn't need people blowing valuable time travelling and the associated costs quite as much as before.
Just a shame someone needed to show all the other videoconferencing "experts" how to write software that actually works - most of the time.
Re: 90 Days?
Not when they realise how much it will cost to bring home offices up to the safety standards demanded of normal offices.
The security issues are very concerning, but hats off to them for coping with a 20 fold increase in users in a few months. Webex has been appalling for the last few weeks and hangouts meet seems to display about 5 pixels from everyone's webcam despite the mighty Google running it. Lets just hope they can improve the security and privacy issues without killing off the performance.
http://www.commitstrip.com/en/2019/08/30/the-future-of-video-conferencing/
Odd install and incomplete uninstall
Rather unusually, the Windows Zoom Client installs into %user%\Appdata\Roaming\Zoom, placing many dlls and executables in a \bin folder there.
Uninstalling doesn't remove its firewall rules.
This week, the biz admitted to infosec journo Brian Krebs that this password-protected-by-default feature may not be working as intended, leaving people's meetings exposed.
Very true. Especially if people (re)use their personal meeting room, of which the meeting ID does not change. I'm not sure, but I believe there is a specific Zoom setting that, so that for a personal room meeting no password is generated and/ or required. What I do know however, is that in the period since Zoom introduced the new password rule, I didn't encounter a single time I had to enter one (avg. 3-5 Zooms/ wk).