News: 0001641530

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

AI/LLM Patch Craziness Having An Impact On ARM64 Linux Kernel Development

([Arm] 4 Hours Ago AArch64 Linux)


The ongoing rise in AI/LLM-generated patches hitting the mailing lists and affecting development workflows continues to impact Linux kernel development. For the ARM64 architecture updates in Linux 7.2 is an interesting anecdote over over feeling like this activity has " slowed us down a little on the feature side " and having to deal with this AI/LLM patch activity resulted in some features now being postponed from making it for this current Linux kernel development cycle.

Even before getting to the ARM64 Linux 7.2 kernel changes, longtime ARM Linux developer Will Deacon prefaced his feature pull request with:

"Please pull these arm64 updates for 7.2. The usual summary is in the tag, although it feels like the new world of AI tooling has slowed us down a little on the feature side when compared to the fixes side. The extra rounds of Sashiko review have also pushed a few things out until next time."

ARM64 is far from alone and is a sentiment shared by other upstream Linux kernel maintainers. From the burden of having to deal with more patches due to AI/LLM generation and not necessarily relevant or pressing patches to legitimate issues raised during code review by the likes of [1]Sashiko continues to have an impact on Linux kernel development.

But what did get baked in time for ARM64 with Linux 7.2 includes new HWCAPS for the 2025 dpISA extensions, additional errata handling, prep work to be able to unmap the kernel data and BSS sections from the linear map, support for the MPAM v0.1 architecture, and various other changes.

See [2]this pull request , since merged to Git, for all the interesting ARM64 feature details for Linux 7.2.



[1] https://www.phoronix.com/search/Sashiko

[2] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/ai_PGPYpLyFr2Vyb@willie-the-truck/



First as to speech. That privilege rests upon the premise that
there is no proposition so uniformly acknowledged that it may not be
lawfully challenged, questioned, and debated. It need not rest upon
the further premise that there are no propositions that are not
open to doubt; it is enough, even if there are, that in the end it is
worse to suppress dissent than to run the risk of heresy. Hence it
has been again and again unconditionally proclaimed that there are
no limits to the privilege so far as words seek to affect only the hearers'
beliefs and not their conduct. The trouble is that conduct is almost
always based upon some belief, and that to change the hearer's belief
will generally to some extent change his conduct, and may even evoke
conduct that the law forbids.

[cf. Learned Hand, The Spirit of Liberty, University of Chicago Press, 1952;
The Art and Craft of Judging: The Decisions of Judge Learned Hand,
edited and annotated by Hershel Shanks, The MacMillian Company, 1968.]