News: 0001571230

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

OpenZFS 2.4-rc1 Brings Linux 6.16 Compatibility, Better Encryption Performance With AVX2

([Linux Storage] 94 Minutes Ago OpenZFS 2.4-rc1)


The first release candidate of OpenZFS 2.4 is now available for testing of this ZFS file-system implementation for Linux and FreeBSD systems.

OpenZFS 2.4-rc1 adds compatibility for the latest Linux 6.16 stable kernel while continuing to support all the way back to Linux 4.18. OpenZFS 2.4-rc1 on FreeBSD continues supporting FreeBSD 13.3 and newer.

OpenZFS 2.4 is bringing better encryption performance by leveraging Advanced Vector Extensions 2 (AVX2) for AES-GCM, allow setting default user/group/project quotas, new deduplication optimizations, unified allocation throttling, and other enhancements.

Key Features in OpenZFS 2.4.0:

- Quotas: Allow setting default user/group/project quotas

- Uncached IO: Direct IO fallback to a light-weight uncached IO when unaligned

- Unified allocation throttling: A new algorithm designed to reduce vdev fragmentation

- Better encryption performance using AVX2 for AES-GCM

- Allow ZIL on special vdevs when available

- Extend special_small_blocks to land ZVOL writes on special vdevs (#14876), and allow non-power of two values

- Add zfs rewrite -P which preserves logical birth time when possible to minimize incremental stream size

- Add -a|--all option which scrubs, trims, or initializes all imported pools

- Add zpool scrub -S -E to scrub specific time ranges

- Release topology restrictions on special/dedup vdevs

- Multiple gang blocks improvements and fixes

- New dedup optimizations and fixes

Downloads and more details on OpenZFS 2.4-rc1 via [1]GitHub .



[1] https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.4.0-rc1



andyprough

Guiorgy

Let's say your wedding ring falls into your toaster, and when you stick
your hand in to retrieve it, you suffer Pain and Suffering as well as
Mental Anguish. You would sue:

* The toaster manufacturer, for failure to include, in the instructions
section that says you should never never never ever stick you hand
into the toaster, the statement "Not even if your wedding ring falls
in there".

* The store where you bought the toaster, for selling it to an obvious
cretin like yourself.

* Union Carbide Corporation, which is not directly responsible in this
case, but which is feeling so guilty that it would probably send you
a large cash settlement anyway.
-- Dave Barry