News: 0001497512

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

AMD Announces Pensando Salina 400 DPU & Pollara 400 Ultra Ethernet NIC

([AMD] 4 Hours Ago AMD Networking)


In addition to announcing the [1]EPYC 9005 "Turin" processors and the latest on the AMD Instinct front, Lisa Su at the AMD Advancing AI event in San Francisco also announced the AMD Pensando Salina 400 DPU and AMD Pensando Pollara 400 Ultra Ethernet AI NIC.

The AMD Pensando Salina 400 data processing unit (DPU) is designed for hyperscalers and offers 400G networking with dual 400GE PCIe Gen 5 connections, 232 P4 MPU engines, up to 128GB DDR5 memory, and 16 x Arm Neoverse-N1 CPU cores. The AMD Pensando Salina 400 DPU is designed to handle software defined networking, firewalls, encryption, load balancing, network address translation, and storage offloading.

[2]

Also on the networking side, the AMD Pensando Pollara 400 was announced as the first Ultra Ethernet Consortium (UEC) ready AI NIC. The AMD Pensando Pollara 400 offers a programmable hardware pipeline, 400 Gbps bandwidth, and open-source drivers. It was just last year that [3]the Ultra Ethernet Consortium was started by the likes of AMD, Intel, the Linux Foundation, Meta, HPE, and other organizations.

[4]

That's the brief overview on the AMD Pensando Salina 400 and AMD Pensando Pollara 400 products with not receiving much information on them in advance and spending most of my time/focus on the new 5th Gen AMD EPYC processors, a.k.a. the [5]AMD EPYC 9965 / 9755 / 9565F CPU benchmarks .



[1] https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9005

[2] https://www.phoronix.com/image-viewer.php?id=2024&image=amd_pensando_salina_lrg

[3] https://www.phoronix.com/news/Ultra-Ethernet-Consortium

[4] https://www.phoronix.com/image-viewer.php?id=2024&image=amd_pensando_pollara_lrg

[5] https://www.phoronix.com/review/amd-epyc-9965-9755-benchmarks



phoronix

... Another writer again agreed with all my generalities, but said that as an
inveterate skeptic I have closed my mind to the truth. Most notably I have
ignored the evidence for an Earth that is six thousand years old. Well, I
haven't ignored it; I considered the purported evidence and *then* rejected
it. There is a difference, and this is a difference, we might say, between
prejudice and postjudice. Prejudice is making a judgment before you have
looked at the facts. Postjudice is making a judgment afterwards. Prejudice
is terrible, in the sense that you commit injustices and you make serious
mistakes. Postjudice is not terrible. You can't be perfect of course; you
may make mistakes also. But it is permissible to make a judgment after you
have examined the evidence. In some circles it is even encouraged.
-- Carl Sagan, "The Burden of Skepticism"