News: 0001464140

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Intel-Powered Aurora Supercomputer Breaks The Exascale Barrier

([Intel] 61 Minutes Ago Aurora Supercomputer)


Intel, HPE, and Argonne National Laboratory have announced at ISC High Performance 2024 that the Aurora Supercomputer has broken the Excascale barrier and is now the fastest AI supercomputer currently in existence.

Last November [1]Aurora debuted in second place on the TOP500 list as a partial deployment. But now the spring list is out for ISC 24 with an even better showing. The Aurora supercomputer is made up of 21,248 Intel Xeon CPU Max Series processors and 63,744 Intel Data Center GPU Max Series accelerators (GPUs). Aurora is spread across 166 racks with 10,624 HPE compute blades.

Aurora has placed second in the HPL LINPACK benchmark with 1.012 Exaflops while utilizing 9,234 nodes (87% of the total supercomputer). Aurora has placed third on the HPCG benchmark with 5,612 TF/s at 39% of the overall machine. So safe bet to say the fastest if fully utilized but seems the bring-up is still ongoing or at least at time of the benchmark submission. (Unfortunately the briefing around their Aurora ISC 2024 positioning was at the last minute on Sunday and collided with Mother's Day in the US to further complicate my usual work Sunday.) Aurora leads for AI at 10.6 Exaflops with HPL-MxP.

Intel's press release to hit the wire now goes on to tout the benefits of upcoming Intel Xeon 6 (Granite Rapids) and further out is the exciting Falcon Shores.



[1] https://www.phoronix.com/news/TOP500-H2-2023-List



Anux

After two or three weeks of this madness, you begin to feel As One with
the man who said, "No news is good news." In twenty-eight papers, only
the rarest kind of luck will turn up more than two or three articles of
any interest... but even then the interest items are usually buried deep
around paragraph 16 on the jump (or "Cont. on ...") page...

The Post will have a story about Muskie making a speech in Iowa. The
Star will say the same thing, and the Journal will say nothing at all.
But the Times might have enough room on the jump page to include a line
or so that says something like: "When he finished his speech, Muskie
burst into tears and seized his campaign manager by the side of the neck.
They grappled briefly, but the struggle was kicked apart by an oriental
woman who seemed to be in control."

Now that's good journalism. Totally objective; very active and straight
to the point.
-- Hunter S. Thompson, "Fear and Loathing '72"