America Acknowledges for the First Time: It Has Deployed Weapons In Space (npr.org)
- Reference: 0185673744
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/09/16/2134242/america-acknowledges-for-the-first-time-it-has-deployed-weapons-in-space
- Source link: https://www.npr.org/2026/09/16/nx-s1-5970937/us-weapons-space
NPR [2]calls this week's reveleations "remarkable ... after previous warnings about countries such as Russia possibly weaponizing a global frontier long agreed in treaties to be used for only peaceful purposes."
> The revelation comes as the Trump administration puts a growing focus on space. In 2019, during his first term, Trump created the Space Force as a separate military branch. In his second term, he has announced the "Golden Dome" missile defense system, which includes plans to put U.S. weapons in space. Trump said last year that he expected the system would be "fully operational before the end of my term," which ends in January 2029, and have the capability of intercepting missiles "even if they are launched from space." Trump also has directed the Pentagon to pursue the space-based interceptors, in an executive order during the first week of his presidency. The Congressional Budget Office estimated that just the space-based components of the Golden Dome could cost as much as $542 billion over the next 20 years.
>
> The Biden administration announced in 2024 that Russia was developing a space-based nuclear weapon that could loiter in space for long durations, then release a burst that would take out satellites around it. That kicked off a renewed debate on the idea of weapons in space at the United Nations. In April 2024, Russia vetoed a joint U.S.-Japanese resolution that would have called on all countries not to develop or deploy nuclear arms or other weapons of mass destruction in space, as banned under a 1967 international treaty that included the U.S. and Russia... The Russian delegation called the resolution hypocritical and a double standard and instead proposed a rival resolution to ban all weapons in space "for all time." It ultimately failed. Russia had argued that the United States and its allies opposed a ban on all weapons in outer space because they planned to deploy weapons there.
Reuters calls this " [3]a landmark moment in space militarization ," while noting that it's "aimed at deterring what U.S. officials describe as aggressive orbital activities from China and Russia, officials and analysts said."
> The remarks this week by Washington's top military-space officials are part of "the increasing comfort level of the U.S. government to speak about aggressive actions in space" that has been building up in recent years, said Victoria Samson, chief director of space security and stability at the nonprofit Secure World Foundation. "We've gone from not talking about counter-space capabilities... to now saying flat-out we have weapons in space," Samson said. "The pendulum keeps on shifting over that way..."
>
> "The acknowledgment of these space-control capabilities is fundamental to ensuring that we prevent deterrence from failing, and that we are postured and ready should deterrence fail to employ them effectively," Richard Palmer, the director of the Capability and Resource Integration Directorate at U.S. Space Command, said on Tuesday.... "The bottom line is that our joint force and our allied forces require space. Our economies require space," added Palmer. "We are ready in the U.S. to preserve that."
[4]Reuters adds that Russia's Foreign Ministry issued criticism of America's move, saying "In pursuit of its narrow self-interests, Washington is ready to completely ignore the catastrophic consequences for humanity of any armed conflict in orbit."
[1] https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/us-orbital-weapons-acknowledgement-landmark-move-us-space-command-official-says-2026-09-15/
[2] https://www.npr.org/2026/09/16/nx-s1-5970937/us-weapons-space
[3] https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/us-orbital-weapons-acknowledgement-landmark-move-us-space-command-official-says-2026-09-15/
[4] https://www.reuters.com/business/aerospace-defense/russia-says-us-acknowledgement-orbital-arms-ignores-space-conflict-consequences-2026-09-15/
Nukes in space (Score:1)
An EMP nuke in space is not very useful, since it would destroy your own equipment also. It reminds of the so called Backyard Bomb that can destroy the whole planet - probably only deemed useful by a crazy Iranian mullah. Small targeted EMP/microwave devices are useful and used against drone swarms for example.
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Do not write off that Backyard Bomb just yet. You find the same kind of utter crazy among some Christian groups as well.
Re: (Score:2)
Well, Dr. Strangelove explained the logic behind such Doomsday Devices. Like it's not a deterrent if you keep it secret and so on.
Why does anyone take this seriously? (Score:5, Insightful)
The current United States government says a lot of things, many of which are decoupled from reality. This statement was very likely issued solely because the occupant of the White House wanted to hear it. This "admission" or "acknowledgement" has no zero relevance to the question of whether or not the United States actually has on-orbit weapons.
Re: Why does anyone take this seriously? (Score:2)
It's nice to see people who get it.
Re: (Score:2)
Does it matter of it's true or not? Other countries will take it as licence to deploy their own weapons, or to paint the US as the bad guy.
Skynet (Score:3, Interesting)
> "Russia's Foreign Ministry issued criticism of America's move, saying "In pursuit of its narrow self-interests, Washington is ready to completely ignore the catastrophic consequences for humanity of any armed conflict in orbit."
Yeah, I don't think we care much about Russia's take on this. They have little to no moral high ground when it comes to "humanity" and "armed conflict". And China has been, no doubt, moving forward steadily with weapons in space.
Anyway, killer space satellites and sentient AI possibly coming... has there ever been a more clear indication of Sykynet?
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skynet_(Terminator)
Re: (Score:2)
Get psychiatric help. So strange. Also, your webcomic is embarassing.
Re:Woke Reuters is just WOKE-Communist Propaganda (Score:4)
Nice example of telling people you are a blithering idiot without telling people you are a blithering idiot.
You should restrict your propaganda-lies to your cult members. Nobody else believes you.
Always some really big assholes do it first (Score:4, Insightful)
No surprise it is the US, which is by now nothing but a lawless rogue nation run by criminals.
This shouldn't surprise no-one (Score:3)
In 1979, I already read a, for that time, very complete article about the possible weapons in space. Most of the theory was worked out. No way that the DoD would have sat for forty years on its ass doing nothing.
Darwin (Score:2)
You know every extinct species that existed before us, from the dodo-bird to the tyrannosaurus .. they all were wiped out by some catastrophic event such as a meteor or some other more capable and adapted species outcompeting them. Humans on the other hand, will be discovered by some future actual-intelligent species .. likely some descendent of cockroaches, if not an alien race, as the one species in the entire galaxy who self-annihilated themselves -- and that too over stupid shit. The only thing that mig
Coming soon to an orbit near you (Score:5, Insightful)
A space weapons arms race plus one million data center satellites.
What could possibly go wrong?
Re: (Score:3, Flamebait)
Data center satellites will not be happening, same as Mars colonies. Or at least not in the next 50 years or so and by then the human race will be in a fight for survival against climate change and have other priorities.
These two things are just hallucinations of the Space Nazi on drugs, who has no clue how Physics works despite supposedly having a Physics BA. I guess he bought that one and never actually studied the Science.
Re: (Score:2)
> Data center satellites will not be happening, same as Mars colonies. Or at least not in the next 50 years or so and by then the human race will be in a fight for survival against climate change and have other priorities.
> These two things are just hallucinations of the Space Nazi on drugs, who has no clue how Physics works
I was wondering if someone did a writeup and of course a simple search finds what we for cooling data centers in space. What that still doesn't mention is that Elon's probable target market is the military who don't actually need that much compute, they just need identification and targeting algorithms that continue to work at large scale when earth to ground communication is heavily disrupted and satellites are under attack. Never underestimate America's billionaire's ability to get by on welfare cheques.
> supposedly having a Physics BA
I
Re: (Score:2)
Sorry; messed up the link
[1]https://www.weforum.org/storie... [weforum.org]
[1] https://www.weforum.org/stories/artificial-intelligence/space-data-centres-cooling/
Re: Coming soon to an orbit near you (Score:2)
[1]https://www.starcloud.com/star... [starcloud.com]
So already done.
[1] https://www.starcloud.com/starcloud-1
Re: Coming soon to an orbit near you (Score:3)
Not to mention the dumbest people on the face of the earth in charge of it all.
Re:Coming soon to an orbit near you (Score:4, Interesting)
What will happen? The same that happened to the Soviet Union when it wasn't able to raise the money to compete, a collapse.
Except this time around it will be the orange shitgibbon's territory that'll fail, because:
[1]https://www.goodreads.com/book... [goodreads.com]
[1] https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/39312362-everything-trump-touches-dies
Re: (Score:2)
> A space weapons arms race plus one million data center satellites.
> What could possibly go wrong?
Kessler knows we won’t get to a million before the inevitable happens.
Threatening to blow shit up isn’t a defense. Because blowing shit up in any orbit, is so self-defeating a child could see it.