News: 0185641984

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

No Rolling Power Outages for California Since 2020 - Thanks to 17,000 MW of New Battery Storage (yahoo.com)

(Monday September 14, 2026 @04:34PM (EditorDavid) from the solar-flair dept.)


"Californians just made it through the [1]hottest August on record without having to endure any rolling power outages," [2]reports the Los Angeles Times . In fact, the state hasn't implemented rotating power outages since 2020.

Because "Over the last few years, California has quietly but dramatically increased the resiliency of its electrical grid through a [3]significant expansion in battery energy storage ."

> These batteries hold onto solar energy captured during the day, so it can be sent to the grid as demand peaks in the evening and morning, when most people are at home running air conditioners and other appliances.

>

> During the August heat wave of 2020, the California Independent System Operator, which manages the flow of electricity for most of the state, declared a Stage 3 Emergency and hundreds of thousands of [4]households lost power in rolling outages. At the time, the system had less than 100 megawatts of battery storage available, according to system spokesperson Jayme Ackemann. Today, it has more than 17,000 megawatts available....

>

> According to Ackemann, the system seeks to add 20,000 to 25,000 megawatts of battery storage capacity by 2045 — the same year it has set a [5]goal of achieving carbon neutrality . That means the state would remove as many carbon emissions from the atmosphere as it emits.

>

> In recent years, California has steadily grown the share of electrical power generated by renewable sources — such as solar, wind, geothermal and hydropower — which bolstered the resiliency of the grid by increasing the overall amount of energy available. An uptick in people installing rooftop solar panels has provided an additional power boost, Ackemann said. In May, California became the first known large-scale power system in the world to have relied on more than 50% solar power for an entire month.... California's grid is also now integrated with electrical systems across much of the Western United States. This means that if there is an extreme heat event in Southern California, energy from a cooler area such as the Pacific Northwest can be imported to help meet regional demand. All of this has collectively helped the state's electrical system weather this year's long-lasting heat.

"Southern California continued to break temperature records this week when Long Beach and Anaheim reached a [6]blistering 107 degrees and Escondido hit 112 degrees..."



[1] https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/09/11/060244/august-was-worlds-joint-hottest-month-on-record-scientists-say

[2] https://www.yahoo.com/news/weather-news/articles/california-survived-hottest-august-record-100000456.html

[3] https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/california-made-another-summer-without-100000648.html

[4] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2020-08-15/worst-heat-wave-in-years-causes-rolling-blackouts-dangerous-conditions-across-california

[5] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2022-12-15/california-approves-roadmap-for-carbon-neutrality-by-2045

[6] https://www.latimes.com/california/story/2026-09-09/southern-california-braces-for-very-dangerous-unusual-heat-plus-oppressive-humidity



Summer vs Winter (Score:3, Informative)

by firewrought ( 36952 )

Summer loads typically peak mid-day and follow solar generation closely... batteries help make managing supply and demand easier, but huge capacity isn't necessarily needed or helpful.

By contrast, it's winter loads that experience the morning/evening "double peak". That's where these large capacities come into play... the sun directly warms houses during the middle of the day (cutting the need for heating) and the batteries soak up excess dollar generation, which then gets spent as the sun sets and in the morning hours the next day.

Re:Summer vs Winter (Score:5, Informative)

by dsgrntlxmply ( 610492 )

CAISO daily data shows that hot season demand in California peaks around 6 PM: the "duck curve". Batteries here help to cover that demand peak as solar fades.

Re: (Score:3)

by Krishnoid ( 984597 )

Woohoo! The solar [1]combined with the batteries [engaging-data.com] are working! (See the mid-day yellow pile, and the blue hump that starts at 6pm)

[1] https://engaging-data.com/california-electricity-generation/?date=2026-08

Re:Summer vs Winter (Score:4, Interesting)

by edi_guy ( 2225738 )

Link to the CAISO data above as well as all the other independent system operators (ISO) around the country. I got this link from a Slashdot poster years ago and have been fascinated with it ever since.

[1]https://www.gridstatus.io/live... [gridstatus.io]

California is CAISO as noted by parent post.

As I write this late morning PDT, that's 73% renewables. Add on another 7% nuclear and that's 80% elec from not burning dead dinos. Nat gas is 8%, imports from other states is 6% (have to assume those imports are nat gas)

Solar 67%

Wind 2%

Geothermal 2%

Hydro 2%

[1] https://www.gridstatus.io/live/

Re: (Score:2)

by whoever57 ( 658626 )

Note that the CAISO data does not show solar generation happening behind the meter -- rooftop solar. It only shows the net flows of electricity by a property with solar and other sources (battery).

Re: Summer vs Winter (Score:3)

by Midnight_Falcon ( 2432802 )

Clearly you have not been to San Francisco. Summers are mild, many days it's chilly; and rarely do temperatures in the Bay Area exceed 80 in coastal areas or 90 inland. Sometimes in the summer I turn the heat on around 8pm going overnight. The 4th of july was fairly cold this year and I wore a thick jacket.

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

Last week it was high-90's and low 100's along the central coast (Santa Cruz & Monterey). It cooled down at night, but I also don't have A/C because I almost never need it, maybe for 3-5 days every 3-4 years it would be appreciated.

San Francisco is its own particularly bizarre climate compared to the rest of California or even the Bay Area. Just going from the tip of the peninsula to the South Bay can add +20F degrees to the temperature. It can be 75F in SF and 95F-105F in San Jose. Sometimes SF gets to

Re: Summer vs Winter (Score:2)

by Midnight_Falcon ( 2432802 )

I do have new mini splits for HVAC and the air conditioning is used at most for two to three days a year, for a few hours on those days. Those days usually coincide with lots of sun hitting my solar panels, so I'm using very little grid power during those times anyway. Also it tends to heat up here in September as ocean temperature rises, while at the same time SoCal is using less air conditioning, so the OPs perspective on time of day doesn't quite map here.

Re: (Score:2)

by serviscope_minor ( 664417 )

Wait what?

The nighttime lows in SF were 12C. That's think jacket weather???

I think Americans now spend so much time in climate controlled buildings that they've forgotten what weather is like.

Re: (Score:2)

by angel'o'sphere ( 80593 )

The nighttime lows in SF were 12C. That's think jacket weather???

Yes.

Are you really such a retard, or are you a 2m 200kg fat guy who has 20cm fat cover all over the body?

What exactly would you wear below 20C if not a Jacket of various thickness?

Re: Summer vs Winter (Score:2)

by Midnight_Falcon ( 2432802 )

Just reading the temperature from Europe won't tell you how it feels. On July 4, a thick soupy fog rolled in along with a bunch of wind, causing significant chill in the humid air so it felt much cooler. A French friend of mine once said to me "In New York in the winter, I am not as cold as I am at night in San Francisco in the summer." When you feel it for yourself, you'll understand. I saw unprepared European tourists by the waterfront desperately wrapping themselves in blankets. It feels MUCH colder t

Re: Summer vs Winter (Score:2)

by AvitarX ( 172628 )

I've been to both.

Windy and 0degrees f in a NY winter is much colder.

Which isn't to say that temperatures in the 50s (especially after a sunny day) aren't light jacket weather. But NY winters are brutal. I've never felt the cold of sleety 35 degree day with high winds in San Francisco. To say nothing of a windy sub zero night.

Re: (Score:2)

by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 )

The southern half of the United States shares latitude with northern Africa, not Europe. We've been in heat for the past 5 months that [1]apparently has killed 35k Europeans [theguardian.com]. For us that's a Tuesday.

Yes I am putting on a hoodie when it's 53F out. I won't be shamed about that. Just like I wouldn't ever shame you about installing AC, it's glorious.

[1] https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2026/aug/25/at-least-35000-excess-deaths-europe-back-to-back-heatwaves

Re: Summer vs Winter (Score:3)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

There's a famous quote, so famous I can't remember who said it ;) about how the coldest winter they ever spent was a summer in San Francisco.

We have an Arctic current that's colder in summer, and a deep trench right off the coast.

Re: (Score:2)

by saider ( 177166 )

“The coldest winter I ever spent was a summer in San Francisco”

Re: (Score:3)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

Current battery capacity only last a few hours after sunset, and starts charging at sunrise. There's a nice graph in this [1]article [substack.com] that shows about a 4 hour coverage with batteries.

Better than nothing, but the shorter daylight hours of winter tends to highlight the limitations we currently have with our battery capacity.

[1] https://samholmes285.substack.com/p/can-solar-panels-batteries-provide

Re: (Score:2)

by pixelpusher220 ( 529617 )

CA has cut gas usage during the duck curve in half in just 5 years.

With the advent of sodium ion batteries for grid scale storage, capacity won't likely be an issue for more than a decade.

More energy hits the earth as solar in an hour than the human race uses, in all forms, in a year (at least before hyperscale data centers anyway).

An 8000:1 surplus. And that's *just* solar.

It more smart thermostats than battery backup (Score:2)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

We are still seeing near weekly brownouts in southern California. We've had one hour long blackout, which is better than some summers of the past.

We have also had numerous alerts that air conditioning was going to be reduced. So batteries are still insufficient, but remotely controlled smart thermostats are making a difference.

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

The way brownouts are evaluated is quite broken. There is little logged with regulatory agencies on sags unless a customer complaint has been filed. If that isn't working for you then escalate to CPUC's Consumer Information Management System (CIMS). This is the route you can go if you have reported brownouts or sags or other service issues and there appears to have been no action taken by SCE.

Re: (Score:1)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

The brownouts are typically extremely short in duration, A second or two. I have UPS on some desktop computers so its not really a problem. Household stuff has been updated to the point where only the oven and microwave need to have their clocks set.

Admittedly things are much better. I started buying the UPS years ago when a one or two hour blackout was happening one or twice a month. Just so I had time to gracefully shut down.

Re: (Score:2)

by pixelpusher220 ( 529617 )

Weekly? pretty sure that would make the news.

As for smart thermostats vs batteries - batteries are explicitly listed in the graphs providing 30 percent of evening peak power just yesterday. [1]https://www.gridstatus.io/live... [gridstatus.io]

Smart thermostats definitely help but you'd need millions of houses pre-chilling down to the mid 60s before seeing demand reduction similar to batteries contributions. Most people aren't going to do that.

[1] https://www.gridstatus.io/live/caiso?date=2026-09-13

Re: (Score:1)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

> Weekly? pretty sure that would make the news.

These brownouts are usually a second or two. With UPS on desktop machines they are irrelevant. I only need to reset the clock on the oven and microwave when convenient. Everything else quickly resets.

> Smart thermostats definitely help but you'd need millions of houses pre-chilling down to the mid 60s before seeing demand reduction similar to batteries contributions. Most people aren't going to do that.

Another way to describe things is that the rolling blackouts seem to have been successfully replaced with rolling reductions in air conditioning. I have not seen a notification of a blackout in recent years except for scheduled maintenance. Notifications regarding automatic thermostat reductions are increasingl

Re: (Score:2)

by angel'o'sphere ( 80593 )

Says the guy who has no clue how power grids work.

Hint: there is a load curve. The power people draw from the net. Which is "kind of" random.

It changes constantly, in milli seconds.

A battery helps to smooth that out. Easy. More easy than pumped storage or a gas turbine.

Re: Summer vs Winter (Score:2)

by AvitarX ( 172628 )

That's no longer true.

People getting home from work and cranking up the AC tends to be more demand than daytime in modern times.

TFA has no supporting data (Score:5, Interesting)

by rta ( 559125 )

No reason to doubt it, but there's no supporting or illustrating operational data in TFA.

Like they mention battery capacity added over 5 years... and better grid interconnects with other regions. But don't show what role specifically either of these played in peak usage scenarios.

like where's the before and after that shows x KW was transferred and allowed higher peak usage with no degradation?

Also, these changes were added over the past 5 years... so why weren't there rolling blackouts in 2021 or 2022? does that mean that everything after that point, which is probably the bulk of the battery storage, was unnecessary?

Re:TFA has no supporting data (Score:4, Insightful)

by Whateverthisis ( 7004192 )

The California State government deserves many of it's very legitimate critiques, but in this case it did something right.

You're right the article is light on details. They did install 17,000 MW worth of batteries; ~13,500 was grid-scale storage and the rest was residential supported through rebates. The rebates on the batteries you earn over time, and to do so you must export some of your stored battery power back to the grid during peak hours. So about 15-20% was residential people incentivized to use their home batteries as storage and the rest was grid storage.

The article doesn't point out that California also added 27,000 MW of generation capacity also but good news it was almost entirely renewables, wind and solar mostly; natural gas power generation has been flat in it's power generation capacity. They still need the NG to help deal with the hourly volatility of the grid, but they didn't need to add any and overall usage is down around 50%.

And to your point, the other thing they did in the interim periods is halfway through this (2022) they asked people to voluntarily use less power via these Flex Alerts, sending the population alerts to limit usage. 2023 it was a colder year on average so they didn't have to go that path.

So overall it is a pretty good success story.

Re: (Score:2)

by edi_guy ( 2225738 )

I got this link from a Slashdot poster years ago and have been fascinated with it ever since.

[1]https://www.gridstatus.io/live... [gridstatus.io]

California is CAISO as noted by parent post. There are frequently days where the sun is shining but temps are not too high or for wind where it is windy, but again temps not so high. In both cases there is a certain amount of electricity that simply cannot be added to the grid because there is no demand. The operators basically turn those off** and that is called curtailment.

[1] https://www.gridstatus.io/live/

Re: (Score:2)

by pixelpusher220 ( 529617 )

Yep, curtailment is just future battery storage.

It would be stupid to build a bazillion GWh of storage without the generation to fill it. Both are happening at increasing speed.

Re: (Score:2)

by kaatochacha ( 651922 )

Everybody's mad at PG&E or DWP or Edison, but they're all caught in a tough place.

They have so many above ground lines, and they've had multiple settlements. Which need to be paid, and generally are paid by raising rates-- though they're limited by law in their rates.

Paying these leaves them with less money to fund the line refurbs which would stop the fires that they're settling on.

Re: TFA has no supporting data (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

Everyone's mad at them because they are fucking monsters.

They are so tightly regulated in what they can charge today because they charged people abusively so many times.

PGE made their own bed and now they can die in it.

Re: (Score:2)

by swillden ( 191260 )

> The rebates on the batteries you earn over time, and to do so you must export some of your stored battery power back to the grid during peak hours.

Is this actually a substantial amount of energy? I'm in Utah (Rocky Mountain Power) and RMP also pays me to use my batteries... but the amount of energy they draw is tiny . 8-10 times per week they draw on my batteries, but it's like 4 kW peak draw (my batteries can sustain 20 kW), and generally for less than 30 seconds, so in any given week I'm only contributing like 0.2 kWh. As I understand it, this is because RMP uses my batteries not really to "serve loads", per se, but just as grid stabilization; bri

Re: (Score:2)

by pixelpusher220 ( 529617 )

TL;DR Trump Lackey / Doesn't Read

Re:TFA has no supporting data (Score:4, Informative)

by Gravis Zero ( 934156 )

You're not wrong!

Rolling blackouts used to be far more common and the government would issue a [1]Flex Alert [ca.gov] to indicate that rolling blackouts would be used. California has CAISO which manage electric related stuff and they have a [2]PDF of grid emergencies since 1998 [caiso.com] which include flex alerts. Spoiler, there hasn't been any since 2022 which is shown in this [3]bar graph of flex alerts by year [brightspotcdn.com].

So now that we have established that rolling blackout haven't happened since at least 2022, the question is why.

[4]Here is a bit [utilitydive.com] [5]more info [publicpower.org] but the TL;DR version is that in 2022 CA passed law to create the [6]Strategic Reliability Reserve [ca.gov] which has multiple programs aimed at preventing power outages, including that distributed energy grid system that was featured on here a while back.

However, is it really batteries that preventing outages? Well, it's already been shown that battery systems react much faster than normal energy production methods which prevents your power from "blinking" when a source goes offline. Also, here's a graph from 2024 that [7]shows when battery power is being used and how much [gridstatus.io] (noticed it's very negative when charging from solar). The point here being that the energy stores are substantial and can be discharged ad hoc. It's not definitive evidence but I'm sure if you dig into some of the stats on [8]https://www.caiso.com/ [caiso.com] that you could find you seek.

[1] https://www.cpuc.ca.gov/industries-and-topics/electrical-energy/flex-alert

[2] https://www.caiso.com/documents/grid-emergencies-history-report-1998-to-present.pdf

[3] https://ca-times.brightspotcdn.com/dims4/default/c232c25/2147483647/strip/true/crop/690x902+0+0/resize/2000x2614!/quality/75/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fcalifornia-times-brightspot.s3.amazonaws.com%2F01%2Fb1%2Fd43d8c934ec5b9c4d0f4f65b4db2%2F5ce7bc74c8b842db946ac72b336bdc0c

[4] https://www.utilitydive.com/news/california-legislation-newsom-reliability-reserve-fund/626441/

[5] https://www.publicpower.org/periodical/article/california-energy-leaders-report-progress-grid-reliability-ahead-summer

[6] https://www.energy.ca.gov/data-reports/california-energy-planning-library/reliability/strategic-reliability-reserve

[7] https://blog.gridstatus.io/content/images/size/w1200/2024/05/batteries_taking_charge_of_the_california_grid-4.png

[8] https://www.caiso.com/

Re: (Score:2)

by pixelpusher220 ( 529617 )

the CASIO site clearly shows batteries providing 30% of grid supply in the evenings just yesterday.

Batteries allow the time shift of midday solar energy surplus to when there's a deficit in the evenings. CA has cut gas peaker usage in the evenings by over 50% in just 5 years.

MW is not storage! (Score:3)

by evanh ( 627108 )

Why can't these journos get that right? Either they're talking about 17000 MW of max power delivery rate, or they're talking about 17000 MW/h of storage. Either can be true and each have separate importance and both valuable figures to quote. But it's unlikely both the MW max power rate and MW/h storage capacity are the same values.

Re: (Score:2)

by evanh ( 627108 )

Oops! MW-h, not WM/h. That was pure dyslexic typing.

Re: (Score:3)

by organgtool ( 966989 )

> Oops! MW-h, not WM/h . That was pure dyslexic typing.

It looks like Muphry's Law applies even when correcting your own posts!

Re: (Score:2)

by groobly ( 6155920 )

I believe that is actually the normal industry nomenclature practice: rating the storage in power available, not energy stored. I guess the rationale is that the power is usually not needed for a long time. I think the rating is for a specific period, maybe 3 hours.

There is no single use case (Score:4, Insightful)

by SubmergedInTech ( 7710960 )

> I believe that is actually the normal industry nomenclature practice: rating the storage in power available, not energy stored. I guess the rationale is that the power is usually not needed for a long time. I think the rating is for a specific period, maybe 3 hours.

There isn't an industry standard. That's because power storage is used for many different things:

1) Grid stabilization for load swings. Timescale = minutes.

2) Daily load smoothing. Timescale = hours.

3) Load smoothing over cloudy days. Timescale = days to weeks. (I can show you graphs from the last 10 years of my solar panels if you want...)

We could have plenty of MW for grid stabilization and the first half of the evening duck curve, and still not enough for the same on a cloudy day, especially if we turn off other sources of baseline or peaker power like nuclear and natural gas.

It's like your car battery. It can run your bluetooth speaker for days. Your headlights for hours. And cranking your engine will drain it in minutes. It's rated in "cold cranking amps", which doesn't tell you anything about how long it can do any of those things.

When demand nears peak capacity. (Score:3)

by Fly Swatter ( 30498 )

They just turn off your water heater. New heaters in CA must be grid capable. and soon will also need to be a heat pump unit killing any resemblance of reliability.

Re: (Score:1)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

> They just turn off your water heater. New heaters in CA must be grid capable. and soon will also need to be a heat pump unit killing any resemblance of reliability.

There is also a program to remotely reduce your air conditioning.

Re: When demand nears peak capacity. (Score:3)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

Lol reliability. Both furnaces in this house needed not just new generators but also gas valves. One of them had been replaced before.

powerline fires (Score:2)

by DrMrLordX ( 559371 )

Power lines triggering wildfires were part of the reason for previous blackouts, no?

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

Public Safety Power Shutoff (PSPS), there is one going on almost every week in some part of the state. I get maybe two a year, if it is going to be a windy day and it is fairly dry they'll cut my power for 6-12 hours typically.

There's several PSPS going on in the Sacramento valley and northern Sierra because it's dry and windy right now. (September 9th to 14th). PG&E has about 1000 people working on it right now.

Re: (Score:2)

by PPH ( 736903 )

If they're smart, they'll put batteries near the loads. And then when the wind blows, they can de-energize lines and keep peoples lights on.

Except people aren't smart. I don't know about California, but here in Washington State, communities in the woods out on the fringes of the grid are fighting a battery installation. Because Teslas catch fire. Teslas have batteries. So everything with batteries will catch fire.

You can build a fire break around a battery substation. Not so much around a garage with an E

Re: powerline fires (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

It's complicated. Santa Cruz county needs a BESS bad but they got a shit one made with recycled LG EV batteries and it caught fire and polluted a bunch of wetlands...

Just wait (Score:2)

by CEC-P ( 10248912 )

Oh, yeah, that makes up for all the taxes and gas prices. I bet AI datacenters won't come ruin it. Anyway, wait until that new plug-in solar panel law gets passed! Let's say 3% of 40 million people put one up and it's 200W average. That's 1.2 MW for around 9 hours a day depending on mounting.

Re: (Score:2)

by CEC-P ( 10248912 )

Typo - 240 megawatts.

Renewable+storage = reliable (Score:4, Insightful)

by SoftwareArtist ( 1472499 )

It's ironic that some people still keep claiming we can't switch to renewables because they aren't reliable. The facts keep showing the opposite. When a drought causes rivers to fall too low to cool your nuclear power plants, renewables keep on working. When someone starts a war that shuts down oil shipments in the middle east, renewables keep on working. When demand spikes and transmission lines get overloaded, distributed solar and batteries are your best friend. They produce energy right where it's needed and keep it off the grid.

Re: (Score:3)

by whoever57 ( 658626 )

> It's ironic that some people still keep claiming we can't switch to renewables because they aren't reliable.

It's an Astroturf campaign designed to benefit fossil fuel companies. The same companies that donated heavily to Trump's last Presidential campaign.

"You all are wealthy enough, that you should raise $1 billion to return me to the White House," -- Trump to oil companies.

Re: Renewable+storage = reliable (Score:2)

by BadgerStork ( 7656678 )

Nah, what is ironic is a one in a century snow blizzard.

Re: (Score:2)

by burtosis ( 1124179 )

Batteries that are cost effective largely solve the intermittent renewable problem. Lithium batteries aren’t even suited to anything more than very short term storage of minutes to a few hours, lithium was developed for energy and power density, able to sustain vibration and impacts without damage (such as being dropped without dents), and the cost can be relatively high as these are mobile device requirements like for laptops, power tools, and EV.

Grid storage is almost diametrically opposed. Ener

Re: (Score:2)

by angel'o'sphere ( 80593 )

Transmission lines do not get overloaded.

Do you think a grid operator does not know what his grid can handle?

Re: Renewable+storage = reliable (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

PGE didn't have any clue how much most of their lines could carry until recently when they hung temperature sensors on them. You can bet there are still a lot of parts of the line which are unmonitored because PGE is a gigantic shitfest. I thought you knew stuff about power distribution, or you thought so anyway, why didn't you know this?

Totally misleading and insulting (Score:1)

by GotNoRice ( 7207988 )

Since 2020 there have been plenty of rolling power outages in California. They simply renamed them "Public Safety Power Shutoffs". While these are done under the guise of "Wildfire prevention", I guess it's just a "convenient coincidence" they occur during the EXACT SAME times that rolling blackouts would have occurred (extreme heat waves). As an added bonus, the burden of dealing with these shut-offs got shifted heavily from liberal urban areas to conservative rural areas, which I'm sure the liberal sta

Re: (Score:2)

by jacks smirking reven ( 909048 )

And this is how you can make a conspiracy out of any group of facts if you are inclined.

High heat and dry conditions do increase wildfire risk.

Rural areas are more prone to wildfires as they have increased vegetation.

Rural areas tend to be more conservative.

Therefore it must be the state government playing villains and shutting off the power to conservative rural areas because they are evil. They have to be evil of course so conservatives can justify supporting the most unhinged actions by their politician

Weird California Metric (Score:2)

by deepthought90 ( 937992 )

So California's metric is that isn't a third world country? Man, that's a low bar.

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

US DoE averted rolling blackouts for [1]17 states [energy.gov] back in July. (California not on that list)

Texas had a rolling blackout back in 2021, which I believe was the last rolling blackout in the continental US.

And there was an unplanned multi-state blackout in the Northeast way back in 2003 due to software+human error. I'm a bit surprised with all the cyber security issues we have today that these kinds of blackouts aren't happening every year.

[1] https://www.energy.gov/articles/energy-secretary-secures-grid-across-17-states-amid-period-hot-weather

So it's like this: (Score:2)

by kaatochacha ( 651922 )

Good: no rolling power outages since 2020 due to lack of capacity.

Bad: Large increase in geographic power outages due to windy fire danger.

Lifespan? (Score:2)

by ThomasBHardy ( 827616 )

There's gotta be a battery nerd on here that can shed some light on this.

What's the lifespan/num cycles or whichever metric is relevant to these types of batteries before they have to be replaced?

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

They're typically Lithium Iron Phosphate (LFP), good for 5000+ cycles before they degrade enough to be a problem. So charging every day they're good for about 10 to 15 years.

In practice, they'll have a site with multiple generations of batteries. So they're always extending their capacity and keeping old batteries in service. Eventually replacing degraded packs with new equipment when it is cheaper (in terms of storage capacity vs cost) to swap out the equipment than to simply add new.

Re: (Score:2)

by stabiesoft ( 733417 )

Curious, sounds like you are in the industry. Are you seeing sodium based starting to get installed? I thought one of the big advantages of sodium was more cycles. Also surprised no one has mentioned, TX has 22GWh of storage now. I noted this morning was a big charge cycle with a 10GW charge peak. I imagine in prep for this evening. Its 100 again, so there will be a sizable discharge tonight.

So now keeping the lights on (Score:2)

by strike6 ( 823490 )

Is considered an accomplishment? We really need to raise our expectations.

Re: (Score:2)

by PPH ( 736903 )

> We really need to raise our expectations.

It's California. They get a gold star for being California.

Re: (Score:2)

by OrangeTide ( 124937 )

This is America, if we're ever in a situation where we have to choose between a business or data center having power 24/7 with 99.99% reliability (1 hour or less) and residential customers having some reduced level like 99.9% (8 hours of outage a year) then you can be certain that's how it's going to play out.

Where we draw the line is really the only debate. Like 95% is more like having 36 hours a month with an outage. Maybe even rolling blackouts every week, so some people don't have power on the same day

Now integrated? (Score:2)

by PPH ( 736903 )

Compared to when? Hoover Dam, in 1936? The Four Corners Generating plant in New Mexico since 1963? The Pacific DC Intertie since 1970?

California has a long and storied history of integrating everyone else's power for years to feed their air conditioning, hot tubs and motorized sex toys. It's almost as if they have been all on their own, running on San Onofre and Diablo Canyon. Poor little things.

Third world country? (Score:2)

by angel'o'sphere ( 80593 )

Sounds like an improvement.

However, most people on the planet do not know what a "rotating power outage" is.

Should the electricity companies pay for this? (Score:2)

by UnresolvedExternal ( 665288 )

Again the people pay for infrastructure that companies should pay for from their massive profits

Tesla Powerwalls - Virtual Power Station (Score:2)

by TheMiddleRoad ( 1153113 )

Two days in a row, my full Powerwalls became part of the virtual power station. We did have an outage, because of a branch or something on our rural road. Otherwise, disaster averted. Hurray for batteries.

"Brown Orifice" Is Only The Beginning

Last week security holes were found in Netscape's Java implementation that
allowed it to act as a web server. Earlier today, a hacker announced that
he had found vulnerabilities in Mozilla M17 that allow it to operate as a
web browser. And that's just the beginning.

Said "3l337h4x0r", the discoverer of the M17 exploit, "This is quite a
hack! By manipulating some internal functions, I was able to use M17 to
actually surf the web. Slashdot and Humorix rendered beautifully."

Mozilla engineers were stunned. "This shouldn't be possible. M17 contains
a newsreader, a mail client, an instant messenger client, and a whole
bunch of XUL acronymn-enriched stuff, but it shouldn't be able to handle
HTTP or HTML. We haven't been planning on adding web-surfing functionality
to Mozilla until M30... maybe M25 at the earliest. I suspect this whole
thing is a hoax."