Sam Bankman-Fried, Former Crypto Billionaire, Appeals His Conviction To the US Supreme Court (cnn.com)
(Sunday September 13, 2026 @05:00AM (EditorDavid)
from the court-of-last-resort dept.)
- Reference: 0185628212
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/09/12/2151206/sam-bankman-fried-former-crypto-billionaire-appeals-his-conviction-to-the-us-supreme-court
- Source link: https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/10/politics/sam-bankman-fried-appeals-conviction-to-supreme-court
America's highest court heard Sam Bankman-Fried's request for a new trial on Thursday, [1]CNN reports . But they add that "the former crypto mogul who was [2]convicted of defrauding investors by secretly diverting billions of dollars of their money" also asked America's high court "to throw out a court order requiring him to [3]pay $11 billion as part of his sentence."
> Bankman-Fried was [4]sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2024 after prosecutors said he directed billions of dollars from the crypto exchange FTX to a hedge fund he controlled called Alameda Research, where the funds were used for risky investments, political donations and his own personal benefit. The Supreme Court appeal, which was reviewed by CNN, raises a technical question about evidence that was submitted at his trial, and whether Bankman-Fried should have been permitted to demonstrate that his investments were ultimately sound and would have covered any losses by FTX customers.
>
> He also argues that the $11 billion forfeiture violates the 8th Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines. "Where the government pursues a theory of fraud under which it doesn't matter whether any victims lost money, introducing evidence suggesting that people actually lost money is distracting and prejudicial," veteran Supreme Court attorney Jeffrey Fisher told CNN. "All the more so where the truth is the victims did not lose money, and the defendant is unable to make that clear."
>
> The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals [5]rejected the arguments earlier this year.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/10/politics/sam-bankman-fried-appeals-conviction-to-supreme-court
[2] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/28/business/ftx-sam-bankman-fried-sentencing
[3] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/29/investing/sam-bankman-fried-forfeiture-11-billion
[4] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/28/business/ftx-sam-bankman-fried-sentencing
[5] https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/OPN/24-961_opn.pdf
> Bankman-Fried was [4]sentenced to 25 years in prison in 2024 after prosecutors said he directed billions of dollars from the crypto exchange FTX to a hedge fund he controlled called Alameda Research, where the funds were used for risky investments, political donations and his own personal benefit. The Supreme Court appeal, which was reviewed by CNN, raises a technical question about evidence that was submitted at his trial, and whether Bankman-Fried should have been permitted to demonstrate that his investments were ultimately sound and would have covered any losses by FTX customers.
>
> He also argues that the $11 billion forfeiture violates the 8th Amendment's prohibition on excessive fines. "Where the government pursues a theory of fraud under which it doesn't matter whether any victims lost money, introducing evidence suggesting that people actually lost money is distracting and prejudicial," veteran Supreme Court attorney Jeffrey Fisher told CNN. "All the more so where the truth is the victims did not lose money, and the defendant is unable to make that clear."
>
> The 2nd US Circuit Court of Appeals [5]rejected the arguments earlier this year.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2026/09/10/politics/sam-bankman-fried-appeals-conviction-to-supreme-court
[2] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/28/business/ftx-sam-bankman-fried-sentencing
[3] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/29/investing/sam-bankman-fried-forfeiture-11-billion
[4] https://www.cnn.com/2024/03/28/business/ftx-sam-bankman-fried-sentencing
[5] https://ww3.ca2.uscourts.gov/decisions/OPN/24-961_opn.pdf
What a moron. (Score:2, Troll)
by backslashdot ( 95548 )
Appealing to the Supreme Court is dumb. The easiest, and 100% guaranteed, path out of prison for him is to start praising the POTUS. Praise all his policies, hate and blame all his opponents. Openly offer him a blow job, and pledge a large monetary donation.
Re: (Score:3)
by phantomfive ( 622387 )
Most of his donations were to Democrats, so he has no chance for that. [1]https://time.com/6241262/sam-b... [time.com]
[1] https://time.com/6241262/sam-bankman-fried-political-donations/
Re: (Score:2)
by backslashdot ( 95548 )
So? One can change.
Re: (Score:2)
by phantomfive ( 622387 )
He doesn't have the money anymore.
bjoo hjoo (Score:1)
Forgetting he exists would be the best punishment.
Re: (Score:2)
Why does he even care to get out of jail? He's on record telling everyone who'd listen that his risk aversion is close to zero. That literally means he doesn't care what the outcome of his bet is. Well, he made the bet, and being in jail is the outcome.
Also, what could he possibly do out of jail that he can't already do in jail? Clearly he's able to talk to people, which he could do outside too. Nobody will listen to him inside or out, because he's a convicted fraud. Also in jail he gets 3 square meals pe
Re: (Score:2)
> Also, what could he possibly do out of jail that he can't already do in jail?
Bowling? Mini golf?? 'Smores???
Re: (Score:2)
Mini golf is so yesterday! The cool kids play micro-golf with an [1]election microscope [acs.org].
Barring that, there's always the DIY version using a plastic straw and a tiny ball of paper.
[1] https://cen.acs.org/analytical-chemistry/imaging/30-years-moving-atoms-scanning/97/i44
Re: (Score:1)
"he made the bet, and being in jail is the outcome."
Does he think that since bitcoin went up and all his investors were made whole, his bet eventually paid off and they jailed him prematurely because a competitor of his spread rumors and his employees said whatever it took to get plea deals?
Re: (Score:2)
Sam practiced "effective altruism" which is a pseudo-philosophy for being a selfish, thieving cunt - that dressing up a self-dealing with the odd charitable donation somehow serves the greater good.
But ironically effective altruism actually worked in this case. Being a selfish, thieving cunt landed him in prison and arguably the greater good was served. It needs to happen more often.