News: 0185525900

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Secretive DHS 'Predictive Policing' Unit Is Analyzing Americans' Financial Habits, Pulling Them Over (404media.co)

(Tuesday September 08, 2026 @11:00AM (BeauHD) from the PSA dept.)


An anonymous reader quotes a report from 404 Media:

> Border Patrol is running secretive predictive policing units that [1]analyze Americans' financial activity and other data , then feed that intelligence to local police who pull people over who are not suspected of any specific crime, but which the government thinks may be worth searching, 404 Media has found. The units, the name of which 404 Media is revealing here for the first time, are called Predictive Intelligence Targeting Teams (PITT). In one case, a PITT analyzed the financial activity of a man who was driving across Montana, and local authorities stopped him under the pretense of an obstructed license plate and charged him with a DUI.

>

> 404 Media identified one PITT in the Spokane Sector, Washington, which polices the U.S. border with Canada, and another in the Laredo Sector, Texas, which polices the border with Mexico. The findings add to an [2]Associated Press investigation from last year which found Border Patrol was using automatic license plate readers (ALPRs) as part of the same wide-spanning predictive policing program. "The bottom line is genuine probable cause cannot be synthetically generated," Jake Laperruque, deputy director of the Security and Surveillance Project at the Center For Democracy & Technology, told 404 Media in an email. Here Border Patrol seems to be "using parallel construction to cloak the reason behind its car stops in secrecy. If we can't meaningfully review and evaluate these systems, we can't trust them," he added.

>

> [...] The DHS document obtained by 404 Media shows that Border Patrol is analyzing the financial activity of Americans to find people to pull over. The Associated Press's investigation found the predictive policing program is also heavily using ALPRs to track potential targets' movements. It is not clear how exactly Border Patrol is monitoring Americans' financial activity. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) declined to answer what financial activity the agency was monitoring, and whether it obtained a warrant or not.

A CBP spokesperson told 404 Media in an email: "U.S. Border Patrol uses intelligence-informed analysis and planning to support national security operations, allocate resources, and help identify potential threats and bad actors to public safety. These efforts are conducted consistent with applicable law, policy, privacy protections, and oversight requirements."

The statement continued: "For operational security reasons, we do not discuss specific analytical methods, data sources, targeting criteria, investigative techniques, system capabilities, or deployment details. Public disclosure of such information could compromise law enforcement operations and investigations as well as creating safety risks for agents and the public."

Rob Frommer, senior attorney at the Institute for Justice, told 404 Media: "The government's increasing use of mass surveillance -- whether that surveillance comes via ALPRs, financial records, or the like -- coupled with predictive policing is a recipe for tyranny. We fought a revolution for the idea that we are citizens, not subjects. Yet schemes like CBP's Predictive Intelligence Targeting Team treat all Americans as if they are potential suspects. This is not just wrong, it's unconstitutional, and IJ will keep pushing courts and Congress to end this attack on Americans' security."



[1] https://www.404media.co/a-secretive-dhs-predictive-policing-unit-is-analyzing-americans-financial-habits-and-pulling-them-over/

[2] https://apnews.com/article/immigration-border-patrol-surveillance-drivers-ice-trump-9f5d05469ce8c629d6fecf32d32098cd?ref=404media.co



Well come on bootlickers (Score:3)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Let's hear how this is a good thing.

Re: (Score:2)

by jhoegl ( 638955 )

If your response is a false "whataboutism", then Id say you know you already lost and you can stay in Russia.

The proper response, REGARDLESS THE SIDE, is that this is against the constitution. If you lived in and were educated in the USA(also part of the citizenship test), you would know this is so far beyond legal that Putin is proud of it.

Re: (Score:2)

by rickb928 ( 945187 )

That is not making it better...

Re: (Score:2)

by dbialac ( 320955 )

People did complain and I'm one of them. Entrances and exits to National Parks and National Forests now have cameras at their entrances to record visitors entering and leaving via a vehicle on a road. The only private way to enter such parks now is by foot.

Re: (Score:2)

by TheMiddleRoad ( 1153113 )

It's good for the totalitarian regime!

Re: (Score:2)

by Tailhook ( 98486 )

> Let's hear how this is a good thing.

It's possible this might change some minds about government data collection of financial activity.

It would be great if we all someday learned that PITT data analysis was actually based on de-anonymized CFPB data, which constitutes the singular largest and most granular financial surveillance program the US government operates, and perhaps put a large moral panic sized dent in the "consumer protection" narrative.

Re: (Score:2)

by dbialac ( 320955 )

I don't support people moving to the US illegally, but I also don't support this policy. While it can be used for enforcement, it is clearly unconstitutional. I don't understand why police departments think they can get away with stuff like that even know it will be overturned by the courts. On the surface I think that law enforcement agencies should be fined for this kind of activity with the money coming directly out of their budgets so that agencies get the message, but if that's done, it is us, the tax

Re: Well come on bootlickers (Score:2)

by BytePusher ( 209961 )

Just look into qualified immunity and civil asset forfeiture. The police think they can get away with this kind of thing, because they can get away with this kind of thing in a police state.

Re: (Score:2)

by Shakes Fist ( 10502847 )

Yep, hardly "Land of the Free"

Wouldn't any judge throw out every case? (Score:2)

by FeelGood314 ( 2516288 )

If a department has been known to use parallel construction as policy, I can't see how any judge would ever trust officers from that agency ever again. A defense attorney should be able to get nearly ever case that required probably cause for a stop or search to be thrown out. This seems like something that the justice department should instantly correct.

In Canada, when our RCMP was doing improper eaves dropping on people's communication our Prime Minister was so angry he took their power to do most eaves

Re: Wouldn't any judge throw out every case? (Score:2)

by reanjr ( 588767 )

The whole point of parallel construction is that you find alternative legal bases for bringing in evidence. The fact that the officers can't be trusted has little impact on the evidence being admissable and damning.

99% probably (Score:2)

by BytePusher ( 209961 )

They're looking for cash withdrawals and gold purchases. This is related to civil asset forfeiture and they're looking to improve their profit margins. The argument will be that they suspect people who carry large stores of physical value are involved in trading drugs, guns, tax evasion or terrorism. Won't you all think of the children?

Re: (Score:2)

by Gilgaron ( 575091 )

Oh so they are looking up where they can seize $10000, impound $5000, and then have the civil forfeiture give $2500 to the department budget?

Social credit (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

It's just China's social credit system. Since it's run by a private company it's fine right? It's the free market at work so how could it be bad

Humor in the Court:
Q. Officer, what led you to believe the defendant was under the influence?
A. Because he was argumentary and he couldn't pronunciate his words.