"We are in a 21st century space race," U.S. Senator Ted Cruz [1]has said . And this week CNN noted a competition that for decades loomed in the background of geopolitics " [2]is now roaring to the forefront ," with China "demonstrating rapid advances in space technology" while the U.S. is "ratcheting up rhetoric about a looming battle for control of the cosmos."

> It's the fact that China plans to build a permanent settlement on the moon by 2040 that has prompted an [3]urgent response from [U.S.] lawmakers ... They've declared a new space race, and NASA is [4]pledging to build a lunar outpost of America's own.... Both the United States and China plan to send robotic explorers to the south pole later this year, paving the way for human explorers to follow close behind.

>

> The US is relying on the private sector to develop and build low-cost, exploratory robotic landers... Meanwhile, China is aiming to launch its robotic Chang'e-7 mission as soon as this month. The complex endeavor will seek to use four different robotic vehicles — an orbiter, lander, rover and mobile "hopper" — working in tandem to attempt to gather [5]unprecedented data . The effort will include tools to drill for and directly analyze water ice, a feat that the US will only attempt with robotic missions slated for [6]next year at the earliest . "If lunar water ice is successfully located, it could significantly reduce the cost and time required to transport water from Earth, facilitating the establishment of a human base for long-term activities on the moon and enabling further exploration of Mars or deep space," Tang Yuhua, the deputy chief designer of the Chang'e-7 mission, said in [7]a 2025 interview with state media.

>

> The oncoming flurry of south-pole-centric activity, with few established international laws to govern the outcomes, is heightening the drama of this rivalry... But with a much more ambitious goal — a future in which people attempt to flourish within permanent settlements rather than just visit the moon — the stakes of this new space race are even higher, according to Clayton Swope, the deputy director of the Aerospace Security Project at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a bipartisan nonprofit. "The long-term vision will take generations to execute on," Swope said. "But in my mind, it's a scenario where there are people being born, people dying, their families, children growing up in a place that is not Earth — so that looks a lot like a city, more than it looks like an expedition to the south pole." If such a future comes to fruition, Swope added, his hope is that such extraterrestrial colonies would be governed by rules reminiscent of Western ideals and democratic principles. Whether China would be on the same page is an open question.

China is already fine-tuning its plans for a lunar settlement, CNN writes:

> The country envisions the International Lunar Research Station, or ILRS, as a sprawling science-focused facility on the moon's surface that can be operated robotically, "with the prospect of subsequent human presence," according to a government's [8]ILRS website . China could partner with Russia to build a massive nuclear reactor to power the base, though questions remain regarding how the war in Ukraine may impact Russia's ability to deliver... China and Russia were mapping these plans long before the US announced its own intention to build a nuclear reactor on the moon [9]last year and detailed its plans for a [10]lunar settlement spanning hundreds of square miles... Who will write the rules? And how, exactly, will the use of lunar resources be policed on the international stage?

Meanwhile, NASA "still does not have a vehicle capable of getting astronauts down to the lunar surface," the article points out:

> Returning to the moon is not as simple as repeating Apollo. The space agency cannot — and does not wish to — replicate its 20th century lunar-landing success. The supply chains, skilled machinists and factories that built Apollo's rockets, landers and command modules no longer exist. And while the Apollo landings stuck close to the lunar equator, landing near the south pole is substantially more complex and requires more powerful vehicles.... China, meanwhile, has been laser focused on its lunar exploration program since 2004, using its top-down, central planning system to keep resources flowing toward specific goals.



[1] https://www.commerce.senate.gov/press/rep/release/theres-a-bad-moon-on-the-rise-why-congress-and-nasa-must-thwart-china-in-the-space-race/

[2] https://www.cnn.com/2026/08/07/science/china-us-moon-space-race

[3] https://www.commerce.senate.gov/press/rep/release/theres-a-bad-moon-on-the-rise-why-congress-and-nasa-must-thwart-china-in-the-space-race/

[4] https://www.cnn.com/2026/06/30/science/nasa-moon-base-announcement

[5] https://www.planetary.org/space-missions/change-7?utm_source=chatgpt.com

[6] https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-selects-blue-origin-to-deliver-viper-rover-to-moons-south-pole/

[7] https://english.www.gov.cn/english.www.gov.cn/news/202502/04/content_WS67a1612bc6d0868f4e8ef55b.html

[8] https://www.cnsa.gov.cn/english/n6465652/n6465653/c6812150/content.html

[9] https://www.cnn.com/2025/08/05/politics/moon-nuclear-reactor-us-nasa

[10] https://www.cnn.com/2026/03/24/science/nasa-ignition-mars-spacecraft-moon-base