Privacy Backlash Explodes Against Meta's Smart Glasses (yahoo.com)
- Reference: 0184915148
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/08/10/0152228/privacy-backlash-explodes-against-metas-smart-glasses
- Source link: https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/meta-ai/articles/pervert-glasses-backlash-against-metas-100000746.html
> Some people are using the glasses — which look like a pair of regular spectacles — to record people without their knowledge and publish the videos on social media. The users secretly videotape and share what happens when they try to pick up women. Now, a growing number of people are worried they could be covertly recorded at the gym or even during sex. The backlash has prompted Meta to update its glasses to address privacy concerns, and some places have banned them, adding to the angst surrounding technology that's rapidly evolving...
>
> Concern about the glasses has exploded as more videos of interactions with people who don't know they're being recorded go viral on social media. On Instagram, some videos depict people getting approached in malls and grocery stores and on college campuses and sidewalks. While the videos are portrayed as jokes, the people filmed don't appear to know they're being recorded and sometimes seem uncomfortable, telling the strangers to leave them alone or stop harassing them. The outcry has spread beyond social media, with comedian Jimmy Kimmel calling the Meta devices "pervert glasses" on national television and singer Lorde telling concertgoers that smart glasses are "not sexy..."
>
> Instagram, which is owned by Meta, has been disabling accounts and taking down some of these pickup or prank videos for violating the platform's rules against harassment and bullying... Businesses are making their own calls about smart glasses. The 5 Point Cafe in Seattle, which banned Google Glass in the past, has banned Meta glasses from its diner and dive bar. "Leave your Meta-SpyBan Display at home, they are officially Ray-Ban-ned from all of our restaurants. We serve privacy, not side-eye surveillance," a 2025 Instagram post from the business states.
An Android app that warns people if they're being recorded has roughly 110,000 downloads in the last six months, according to the article. The app's creator says it's a "social problem" that "we don't value privacy, that we feel entitled to use others for our entertainment or our private gain, and technology amplifies that."
The American Civil Liberties Union and more than 70 organizations even sent a letter urging Meta to promise they'd leave facial recognition features out of their smart glasses, according to the article. But a Meta spokesperson said "no final decision has been made."
[1] https://tech.yahoo.com/ai/meta-ai/articles/pervert-glasses-backlash-against-metas-100000746.html
glasshole 2.0 (Score:3)
We saw this with google glassholes, why would Meta expect anything else. wearing these in public is just inviting confrontations and by the sounds of things deservedly so.
Re: (Score:2)
This really does feel like deja vu. The only thing that's changed is this time around the glasses look less dorky to the casual observer. Though, once you get right up in someone's face and see the camera lens on their glasses, that old familiar glasshole alarm starts ringing again.
Surveillance cameras (Score:1)
I remember a huge outcry around surveillance cameras in stores and the like a few decades ago.
Now everyone seems to accept/ignore the fact that you're being recorded while shopping at Walmart or even just driving down the street.
So is this another flash-in-the-pan surveillance outrage that will fade away just like it apparently did before?
My idea of smart glasses that would actually be useful would be something that would be a personal computer display like you see in some science fiction movies. Wouldn't
Re: (Score:2)
The ultimate irony would be someone using Meta glasses to live stream their vandalism of Flock cameras.
Re: Surveillance cameras (Score:2)
Not at all the same. In store cameras are closed CCTV systems. They are filmed with security and law enforcement in mind - not social media clicks. Plus they are passive and fixed, discrete devices in the ceilings of buildings - they don't follow you around on foot, and interact with you via the wearer. This will not go away.
During Sex? (Score:2)
Who wears glasses while they are having sex?
Re:During Sex? (Score:4, Funny)
Mark Zuckerberg
Many POV video producers! (Score:2)
> Who wears glasses while they are having sex?
It's a great way to film yourself having sex if you have the consent of your partner. Sunglasses are weird, but not as weird and a gopro on your forehead. I can see these as a staple of amateur porn. No one wants to see the guy, so the sunglasses make him even more of a prop from other camera views, but many want to see things from his point of view!
Re: Many POV video producers! (Score:2)
You sound like a pro gooner
Re: (Score:2)
Meta glasses can only record for 3 minutes at a time unless you're live streaming, and I'm fairly certain Meta's TOS prohibits that kind of content, so live streaming isn't going to be an option.
At any rate, adult video productions do their own version of "Hollywood movie magic" and if that means the person getting fucked has to ignore the helmet mounted GoPro, that's just part of what they signed up for. Meta glasses basically bring nothing of value to the table, at least for producers of legitimate adult
Re: (Score:1)
"Who wears glasses while they are having sex?"
Maybe her beauty was blinding.... :-)