News: 0184896118

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

NASA Figured Out How To Keep Its 48-Year-Old Voyager 2 Probe Running For Yet Another Year (space.com)

(Saturday August 08, 2026 @11:34AM (BeauHD) from the keep-on-voyaging-on dept.)


NASA has [1]squeezed at least another year of science out of Voyager 2 by cutting power to nonessential systems and switching to lower-power alternatives. Voyager 1 is expected to receive the same power-saving changes in the coming months. Space.com reports:

> Voyager 2 and its twin launched in 1977, called Voyager 1, rely on a form of nuclear battery known as a radioisotope thermoelectric generator that uses the heat produced by the decay of plutonium. But the supply of plutonium on each probe drops at about four watts a year on each spacecraft. To keep the probe running on this dwindling power supply, engineers recently reduced Voyager 2's power requirements by turning off a few non-science devices and using "lower-power alternatives" that are still effective enough to keep the spacecraft warm while it's so far from the sun, NASA officials [2]said in a statement . "The spacecraft power margins have grown razor thin, requiring the team to conserve energy by shutting off non-essential devices and systems," NASA officials wrote of the mission, which is managed by the agency's Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

>

> The drop in power is having a measurable science impact on both spacecraft -- each has turned off two of their science instruments since 2024 alone. While some of these instruments were shut off after the spacecraft finished their historic planetary flybys decades ago, others were turned off due to power requirements. Each spacecraft initially launched with 10 instruments, and Voyager 2 is now down to only three instruments. At first it looked as though Voyager 2 would have to shut down another of these instruments later this year, but luckily, the new power shifts will allow all three to operate "for at least another year," NASA said.



[1] https://www.space.com/space-exploration/voyager/nasa-figured-out-how-to-keep-its-48-year-old-voyager-2-probe-running-for-yet-another-year

[2] https://science.nasa.gov/blogs/voyager/2026/08/04/nasa-engineers-help-prolong-voyager-2s-science-mission/



Is this (Score:2, Funny)

by rossdee ( 243626 )

something to do with Persis Khambatta?

Nomad (Score:2)

by Ritz_Just_Ritz ( 883997 )

Never beam it aboard the ship.

Re: (Score:3)

by hackertourist ( 2202674 )

Even with Starship that would be a titanic undertaking. The Voyagers are moving away from us at 17 km/s. When you get to the Voyagers, you have to slow them down from 17 km/s to 0, and then accelerate in the opposite direction. You'd have to arrive at Voyager with [1]thousands of tons of fuel [xkcd.com].

[1] https://what-if.xkcd.com/38/

Re: (Score:2)

by phantomfive ( 622387 )

> Voyager weighs a little less than a ton and is moving away at 17 kilometers per second

I didn't realize it was so heavy.

The Pioneer and Voyager probes (Score:3)

by jd ( 1658 )

Although it would be wonderful if we could retrieve them, realisically we can't. And if we could get something to them to fit new nuclear batteries and replacements for components that cannot be revived, we could get newer probes out there with better sensors and a more powerful nuclear battery that could last a lot longer.

Having said that, I honestly wouldn't trust any of today's manufacturers to be capable of building anything with a comparable level of robustness, so a recharge mission isn't quite as stupid as it sounds. Almost, but not quite.

Still, fresh probes sent into the Kuipier Belt and the Heliopause would be extremely interesting.

Re: (Score:2)

by 4wdloop ( 1031398 )

Out of curiosity I have checked what CPU ISs were available in '77, there was 6502, 8080, Z80 (10x speed of viking's CPUs) albeit all done in NMOS, and NMOS is susceptible to radiation. Hence, the Viking's CPU were build on low-density CMOS discrete logic instead. Also better for power consumption. But I agree that 21th century equipment is designed with few years life span. Use and refuse, but not reuse.

Congrats (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Hats off for everyone at NASA working to keep the probe running. I would love to hear from any of the original designers or programmers to see their thoughts.

are we still learning anything (Score:2)

by sziring ( 2245650 )

Is there anything we are learning with the instruments being shutoff other than how far we can communicate back to earth? Pretty cool but what is the bill for the pings back and forth??

Raising pet electric eels is gaining a lot of current popularity.