How 'Situational Awareness' Hedge Fund Dropped 67% in AI Stock Rout (nypost.com)
- Reference: 0184808824
- News link: https://slashdot.org/story/26/08/02/0359246/how-situational-awareness-hedge-fund-dropped-67-in-ai-stock-rout
- Source link: https://nypost.com/2026/08/01/business/nostradamus-of-ai-leopold-aschenbrenner-didnt-have-the-crystal-ball-seeing-hedge-fund-portfolio-dip-67/
> Aschenbrenner, a former OpenAI employee, founded the hedge fund on the premise that "AI will be the dominant driver of global market returns over the next decade," according to the firm's site... Aschenbrenner managed to turn hundreds of millions of dollars into tens of billions of dollars over the course of roughly two years... That streak ended on Thursday, though, when the fund was forced to sell the bulk of its public holdings to a bigger rival after many of its investments went south.
>
> But that's only part of the story. The fund employed a risky strategy of borrowing money to purchase stocks. When the investments appreciate, the payoff can be massive. But when the investments sour, the losses can be catastrophic. The downturn in AI stocks over the course of this month, like chip makers and cloud computing providers, hit the hedge fund extra hard. It was forced to sell off many investments at a steep discount to rival hedge fund Citadel in what Aschenbrenner [2]reportedly compared to a "bank run" in a letter to investors.
"Critics pointed out that Aschenbrenner had no experience running money prior to launching his fund in July 2024, calling him more lucky than smart," [3]writes CNBC :
> Some noted that his early work experience was at the doomed crypto firm FTX, where he helped now-disgraced founder Sam Bankman-Fried run a charity out of a Bahamas penthouse. Others on Wall Street, including former traders at global investment banks, noted that in light of reports Situational Awareness used as much as 400% leverage, the collapse wasn't shocking.
[4] The Wall Street Journal reports that Situational Awareness "also used options to amplify its returns. That meant that even small declines in individual names could have big impacts on Situational's portfolio."
And so, as [5]the New York Post put it , "The celebrated crystal ball of the ' [6]Nostradamus of AI ' hasn't merely gone cloudy — it has rolled off the table and shattered on the parlor floor."
> Wall Street breathed a huge sigh of relief last week as an AI-focused hedge fund called Situational Awareness reportedly sold most of its portfolio — [7]reportedly down 67% last month on the backfiring of debt-fueled bets on chipmakers and assorted artificial-intelligence firms — to billionaire Ken Griffin's Citadel...
>
> The prevailing sentiment was best summed up by a veteran Wall Street sage who has seen a lot of flameouts in his day. Let's just say he wasn't impressed by Leopold Aschenbrenner, the 25-year-old German-born "Nostradamus" figure who is the founder of Situational Awareness... "Just your typical leveraged Âidiot who was right until he was wrong," the source said, adding that the implosion is a "one-off..."
>
> [Another trusted source] felt there was room for conversation: "A significant issue. Not viewed as systemic right now. I wonder if that changes as more problems arise." Indeed, the fact is that most of Wall Street is [8]closely monitoring the Situational Awareness situation because they were holding many of the same positions as ÂAschenbrenner. Another top hedge fund manager I won't name tells me he has been getting crushed on similar investments in chipmakers essential to the AI supply chain, as well as other companies feeding off this technology.
Thanks to Slashdot reader [9]joshuark for sharing the news.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2026/07/31/business/situational-awareness-explained
[2] https://www.wsj.com/finance/investing/situational-awareness-down-67-in-july-in-ai-stock-rout-cd19901f
[3] https://www.cnbc.com/2026/07/31/leopold-aschenbrenner-situational-awareness-fund-fire-sale.html
[4] https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/companies/his-wedding-guests-were-arriving-just-as-his-45-billion-fund-was-falling-apart/ar-AA2997uK
[5] https://nypost.com/2026/08/01/business/nostradamus-of-ai-leopold-aschenbrenner-didnt-have-the-crystal-ball-seeing-hedge-fund-portfolio-dip-67/
[6] https://nypost.com/2026/06/08/business/meet-the-nostradamus-of-ai-who-built-a-20-billion-hedge-fund-before-turning-25/
[7] https://www.wsj.com/finance/leopold-aschenbrenner-situational-awareness-ai-fund-597633d3
[8] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/07/31/business/situational-awareness-leopold-aschenbrenner.html
[9] https://www.slashdot.org/~joshuark
Hedge fail (Score:3)
A hedge fund is named such because they (traditionally) hedge against risk. Thus, whether the stock goes up or down, the hedge fund can make money (and lose money if it stays flat).
This fund clearly failed on the hedging. No point in using a hedge fund at that point, might as well have just bought the stock (or options if you're crazy).
Re: (Score:2)
Why, is losing your money any less painful if the bad decisions were made by 50 or 60 year oldfags like the management of Lehman Brothers back then?
Old technique (Score:5, Insightful)
There is an old technique - the guaranteed winner by random chance:
You get 32 stock brokers. On Monday the boss picks 2 stocks. 16 say that stock is going up, 16 say down, and they each call 100 people and give their prediction. That evening the 16 that were 'right' call their 100 back and brag. Tuesday they repeat only with 8 on each side. Repeat on Wednesday with 4 winners. Thursday they have 2 winners. Friday they have 1 winner that brags to his 100 prospects:
"Look, I happened to predict the winner every day this week. I can not guarantee that will happen every day, but if you want to hear my predictions next Monday, I need you to move your account to my firm."
And the gullible fool does it, not knowing that mathematically the predictions were guaranteed to work on 1 of the 32 brokers. Just math, not competence.
Betting on AI was not some super genius move - especially using margin. All it involved was taking the popular opinion and going all in. While it worked you look like a genius. When it fails, you lose everything.
He just played the odds and won for a while. But the math was never going to have him win forever.
Re: (Score:2)
> All it involved was taking the popular opinion and going all in.
Insightful distillation.
Re: (Score:2)
Yes! There was a 1957 episode of Alfred Hitchcock Presents, based on a 1954 story that used this exact idea. [1]https://barebonesez.blogspot.c... [blogspot.com]
[1] https://barebonesez.blogspot.com/2016/02/the-hitchcock-project-robert-c-dennis_18.html
This is the canary in the coal mine (Score:2)
This particular one was exquisitely susceptible because it was managed by a stupid, corrupt crypto bro (yes, that's redundant; all crypto bros are stupid and corrupt) but there are similar ones managed by allegedly sober people with decades of investment experience...and they're not immune to the same market forces. The hype/mania around AI valuations will eventually collide with reality -- and perhaps "eventually" is "soon". A few people will make a fortune (and already have, on paper at least) and a lot
Lets fucking go. (Score:2)
Momma really needs some new GPUs.
\o/ (Score:1)
Really? Wall street lecturing about leverage after destroying the world's economy eighteen years ago?
Kyla Scanlon discussed this ... (Score:2)
[1]Kyla Scanlon [wikipedia.org] had a pretty good [2]explaination [instagram.com] of this on Instagram...
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kyla_Scanlon
[2] https://www.instagram.com/reels/DbeL0vmxL6M/
400% leverage = gambling (Score:2)
I'm sorry, but if you're investing in a fund that uses 400% leverage, you should know you have a low chance of massive returns and good chance of losing most if not all of your investment - similar to a lottery. I believe in free market, therefore I believe anyone should be free to invest in a lottery, but should not be surprised (nor bailed out by other people, i.e. taxpayers) if their lottery ticket doesn't win any money.
Awwww... (Score:1)
We should pass around a hat for all those rich people who didn't richer as fast as they expected to.
Average WSB regard (Score:3)
400 % leverage, risky options play, ex-crypto bro, goes all in on the next big hype.
For a second I thought this was r/wallstreetbets