Drying Lakebeds Are Releasing Massive Amounts of Carbon, Study Finds (sciencealert.com)
- Reference: 0184675424
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/07/25/0417232/drying-lakebeds-are-releasing-massive-amounts-of-carbon-study-finds
- Source link: https://www.sciencealert.com/the-worlds-largest-dried-lakebed-is-leaking-vast-amounts-of-carbon-but-scientists-say-theres-a-solution
> In a new study [2]published in Science , scientists say the Aral Sea — the world's largest desiccated lake — has emitted a whopping 204 megatons (~225 million US tons) of carbon dioxide since it was drained in the 1960s... The study estimates that between 1960 and 2022, the evaporating sea has released 204 megatons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere, based on site surveys and core samples collected from across the dry lakebed...
>
> The new study suggests that rehydrating the entire basin could come with enormous benefits to the environment, not just within the sea itself, but at a global level. "There is a hidden carbon treasure beneath the Aral Sea," [3]says biochemist Rafael Marcé from the Spanish National Research Council. "If these sediments remain exposed, carbon will continue to be released into the atmosphere. If the sea is re-flooded, that same carbon could shift from being a source of emissions to becoming part of the climate solution." According to the researchers' calculations, re-flooding the lakebed could prevent the release of the estimated 165 megatons of carbon that remain.
>
> The study also revealed that nearly one-fifth of the Aral Sea's carbon emissions are actually being released as wind blows away sediment on the lakebed, a factor that researchers had not accounted for in the past.
Thanks to Slashdot reader [4]schwit1 for sharing the article.
[1] https://www.sciencealert.com/the-worlds-largest-dried-lakebed-is-leaking-vast-amounts-of-carbon-but-scientists-say-theres-a-solution
[2] https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aeb2344
[3] https://www.igb-berlin.de/en/news/reflooding-aral-sea-could-prevent-massive-co2-emissions
[4] https://www.slashdot.org/~schwit1
Also methane from melting permafrost. (Score:4, Informative)
Also [1]Arctic Sinkholes [pbs.org] (NOVA: S49E01, 53m) releasing massive amounts of methane as frozen permafrost melts.
> Colossal explosions shake a remote corner of the Siberian tundra, leaving behind massive craters. In Alaska, a huge lake erupts with bubbles of inflammable gas. Scientists are discovering that these mystifying phenomena add up to a ticking time bomb, as long-frozen permafrost melts and releases vast amounts of methane, a potent greenhouse gas.
[1] https://www.pbs.org/video/arctic-sinkholes-9jwenj/
Danger! Inflammable! (Score:2)
Completely off topic, but you gotta love the English language. Inflammable is a perfect synonym for flammable.
Re: (Score:2)
> Completely off topic, but you gotta love the English language. Inflammable is a perfect synonym for flammable.
Sterling Archer noticed that somewhere along the way. :-)
Uhhhhhhh (Score:5, Informative)
"Rival our fossil fuel habit."??? 240 megatons is 240 million metric tons... over 62 years. That's an average of about 3.8 million per year. Cars are releasing 3.5 BILLION metric tons per year. That's literally almost 3 orders of magnitude smaller (almost 1000x). In fact, that comes out to 9.6 million per day. Cars release 2.5x the amount in a single DAY than that fucking lakebed does all year. This is a fart in a swimming pool of CO2.
Re: (Score:2)
> "Rival our fossil fuel habit."??? 240 megatons is 240 million metric tons... over 62 years. That's an average of about 3.8 million per year. Cars are releasing 3.5 BILLION metric tons per year. That's literally almost 3 orders of magnitude smaller (almost 1000x). In fact, that comes out to 9.6 million per day. Cars release 2.5x the amount in a single DAY than that fucking lakebed does all year. This is a fart in a swimming pool of CO2.
To be fair that is just one lake. There are probably more.
Guess what (Score:2)
It doesn't matter.
Climate scientists desperate to stay relevant, (Score:1, Insightful)
New study finds.
Quick, rake the sand! (Score:1)
- Stable Genius
W H O P P I N G ?? (Score:2)
Sure, 204 Mtonne (Tg) sounds big, but over 60+ years, it isn't, only 930 tonne/day. About 2 kBpd, not that it matters because CO2 is spectrographically saturated on the physically-dictated absorbtion wavenumbers. More only reduces the altitude.
Warning heeded (Score:5, Funny)
Luckily we are in a time where science and experts are respected and valued, so this will be immediately taken up and acted on.
Re:Warning heeded (Score:4, Insightful)
Thankfully journalists, opinion commentators, and political pundits stick to fact-based reporting; and would never spin an issue with serious global consequences into another ideological identity as part of a false left-right political dichotomy.