Paramount Agrees to Postpone Warner Bros. Merger Until June 2027 (variety.com)
- Reference: 0184667556
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/24/2235232/paramount-agrees-to-postpone-warner-bros-merger-until-june-2027
- Source link: https://variety.com/2026/film/news/paramount-warner-bros-merger-postpone-antitrust-trial-1236820601/
> Paramount had been keen to close the deal before Sept. 30, when it will begin to incur a $7-million-a-day "ticking fee" to be paid to Warner Bros. investors. The agreement is a tacit acknowledgement that that will not happen, barring a settlement with the states. Paramount previously sought a three-day hearing on the injunction motion in late August, hoping to win the judge's blessing to close the deal sometime in early September. But the states resisted that idea, saying they would need more time to take discovery and prepare for a full trial on the merits. The states were due to file their injunction motion on Thursday night, but held off as the two sides held discussions on a path forward. In a statement, the company said the agreement is a "significant win."
>
> "Today's agreement is a significant win because the result is exactly what we have sought from the outset: a direct path to a trial based on the evidence," a Paramount spokesperson said. "This is the fastest and clearest way to prove that this transaction is good for competition, good for consumers, and good for creators, a conclusion dozens of competition authorities around the world have already reached. Plaintiffs' market definitions bear no relationship to the realities of today's marketplace and cannot withstand scrutiny. We look forward to proving our case at trial."
>
> A hearing was scheduled for Aug. 3 in federal court in Oakland, at which point the two sides were expected to argue over the injunction motion. The two sides agreed to cancel that hearing. U.S. District Judge Araceli Martinez-Olguin approved the joint stipulation on Friday afternoon, about an hour after it was entered. The Writers Guild of America filed its own motion for an injunction earlier this week, which was also set to be heard on Aug. 3. That motion has been withdrawn, as Paramount has effectively conceded that it will not close the deal until a determination of the merits of the antitrust claims. The parties also agreed to submit a joint stipulation by July 31 on their respective positions on trial scheduling. The states previously proposed to hold the trial in April 2027.
[1] https://variety.com/2026/film/news/paramount-warner-bros-merger-postpone-antitrust-trial-1236820601/
[2] https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/07/13/1740256/states-sue-to-block-paramount-warner-bros-merger-defying-doj
a lot of BS (Score:2)
> In a statement, the company said the agreement is a "significant win." "Today's agreement is a significant win because the result is exactly what we have sought from the outset
no. just a few lines earlier:
> Paramount had been keen to close the deal before Sept. 30
Re: (Score:2)
> no. just a few lines earlier:
>> Paramount had been keen to close the deal before Sept. 30
It will cost Paramount about $7 million per day as payment to WBD stockholders for delays beyond Sept 30th. Of course they wanted to close by Sept 30th ($650M each quarter is real money).
That's cool (Score:2)
Just in time for it to be an issue during the 2028 election. I'm guessing that they are hoping that election coverage will give them coverage and a distraction but I'm pretty sure that at some point voters are going to realize not enforcing antitrust law for 50 years was a bad thing.
Re: (Score:2)
Yup. My prediction: The antitrust trial will be theatre by regulators who stopped regulating years ago, the merger will go ahead as planned, and then ParaSkyWarner will sue the states to recover their $7m/day ticking fees.
Re: (Score:2)
> ParaSkyWarner will sue the states to recover their $7m/day ticking fees.
Paramount will lose quickly if it tries.
The states aren't responsible for a private deal between companies, and they have sovereign immunity anyway. They're just enforcing antitrust laws.
No dog in the fight (Score:1)
But I do find it intriguing how it's okay to launch politically motivated lawfare from one direction, but it's a crisis of democracy when it comes from the other direction.
Almost like the outrage and cheerleading are an act while the lawyers keep on collecting a few k or more per hour dragging these things out...
Re: (Score:2)
Whether or not it's lawfare depends on the merit of the case. And the states' case against the Paramount-Warner merger has merit. Paramount already owns a great many media outlets. It's tenable to argue that acquiring Warner would be too much.
This is still a terrible deal (Score:2)
these mergers should not happen at any time.
It'll be a short wait. (Score:2)
My guess is DJT is just making them wait until the check clears.
Re: (Score:2)
Since this is brought by the states, there probably isn't anything he can (legally) do.
Re: (Score:2)
The Trump admin already cleared the merger. These states weren't having it, and sued since the Feds were not. Trump can't do anything to make this suit go away.