News: 0184444000

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

States Sue to Block Paramount-Warner Bros Merger, Defying DOJ (variety.com)

(Monday July 13, 2026 @05:12PM (BeauHD) from the red-flags dept.)


A coalition of 12 states led by California is [1]suing to block the $111 billion Paramount Skydance-Warner Bros. merger , arguing it would reduce competition in theatrical distribution, blockbuster films, and basic cable licensing. The [2]challenge (PDF) defies the [3]DOJ's approval of the deal. Variety reports:

> The coalition, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, alleges that the $111 billion transaction violates the Clayton Act by lessening competition in three distinct markets: wide-release theatrical distribution, "top-grossing" theatrical distribution, and basic cable licensing. "The unlawful merger of these two entertainment behemoths would lead to higher prices, lower quality, and less content for film and television, harming movie theaters, basic cable distributors, and ultimately, audiences on every sofa and movie theater seat in the U.S.," Bonta said in a statement on Monday.

>

> The suit argues that the combined company will control 27% of the wide-release theatrical distribution market, 30% of the submarket comprising "anticipated blockbuster films," and 27% of the basic cable bundle. The states argue that such consolidation will harm theaters and cable and satellite providers that rely on competition among distributors. Paramount and Warner Bros. are two of the five remaining legacy studios. Together, all five -- including Disney, Sony and Universal -- control 86% of theatrical distribution and 90% of blockbuster distribution, the states said. Warner Bros. and Paramount are also the second- and third-largest basic cable distributors, respectively.

>

> [...] The states are expected to seek an injunction to block the transaction, which Paramount expects to close sometime after July 22. The 12 states in the coalition are Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Nevada, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, and Washington. [...] All are represented by Democratic attorneys general.

"Consolidation here not only leads to higher prices -- it also leads to fewer opportunities for important stories to come to life, and fewer ways for audiences to encounter stories, ideas, and perspectives beyond their own experiences," Bonta said. "In this country, no one is above the law. With this lawsuit, California and our sister states are fighting for free and fair markets, not rigged markets. America has no kings in government or our economy."



[1] https://variety.com/2026/film/news/paramount-warner-bros-merger-states-lawsuit-1236806824/

[2] https://oag.ca.gov/system/files/attachments/press-docs/2026.07.13%20Redacted%20Paramount%20Warner%20complaint%20-%20not%20file%20stamped.pdf

[3] https://slashdot.org/story/26/06/12/2124201/justice-department-approves-paramounts-111-billion-acquisition-of-warner-bros



Let it burn (Score:3)

by TwistedGreen ( 80055 )

I can only see this as a good thing, similar to what Microsoft did to the gaming industry: buy up a bunch of studios, do nothing with them for years, then fire everyone. Basically a money burning party. All those developers are now free to work for independent studios and do something new.

Are blockbuster films and basic cable really things worth preserving?

Re: (Score:2)

by RitchCraft ( 6454710 )

"Are blockbuster films and basic cable really things worth preserving?"

No.

Re: (Score:3)

by bussdriver ( 620565 )

1. Blockbuster films help fund other films and a lot of people like them enough to have them make money or crash and burn a ton of cash... They shouldn't succeed simply because they have a 30% marketing budget which is ridiculous because of the film's pile of money.

Yes, it makes bland stuff to appeal to the lowest common denominator and they don't have to run their business on massive bets; perhaps if people were not such gullible consumers?? FX doesn't draw people in as much...

Also, those expensive films

Re: Let it burn (Score:2)

by Fons_de_spons ( 1311177 )

Uhm... really, blockbuster movies are bad. It is not us who are spoiled with too much entertainment. It is just getting more and more what mc Donald's is for food. No soul, the result of industrial processing. Blockbuster movies are almost engineered these days. Like those programs that uses colored blocks with loop patterns to make music. Thank God there are still enough exceptions though.

What about Netflix? (Score:2)

by Cpt_Kirks ( 37296 )

The same characters were up in arms over Netflix buying WB.

Re:What about Netflix? (Score:4, Informative)

by The-Forge ( 84105 )

At this point they see Netflix as the way lesser of 2 evils.

sometimes I (Score:1)

by DarkOx ( 621550 )

Sometimes I wonder if this is all a grand conspiracy to destroy federalism and make us 50 nifty little states..

I hope so

Re: (Score:2)

by nightflameauto ( 6607976 )

> Sometimes I wonder if this is all a grand conspiracy to destroy federalism and make us 50 nifty little states..

> I hope so

If we shatter, I think it'll be a lot more than 50 separate entities. Because there are a lot of states where there's a HARSH divide between urban/rural, or even different regions not strictly on a city/country divide. Our government and our press have done such an amazing job of dividing us over the last forty-plus years that it's going to be near impossible to bring us back together. But if we shatter, it's gonna be a HELL of a mess. I don't look forward to the waves of repercussion it will cause us durin

Re: (Score:2)

by ArchieBunker ( 132337 )

Now all of a sudden you don't like states rights?

X/Tesla (Score:2)

by Physician ( 861339 )

Court: Congratulations. The merger has been blocked. Elon Musk: Great. I will be purchasing it.

Let's see (Score:2)

by PPH ( 736903 )

That's a "No" to Netflix. And a "No" to Paramount.

The only bidder left appears to be Ow! My balls!

Re: (Score:2)

by dgatwood ( 11270 )

I'll make an offer right now to buy it for $1,000 with the intent to release the entire catalog into the public domain (CC0) 28 years after its creation.

Re: (Score:2)

by Zak3056 ( 69287 )

I'm sure the shareholders will be lining up in droves to accept your offer of 1/25000 of a cent per share.

Re: (Score:2)

by dgatwood ( 11270 )

> I'm sure the shareholders will be lining up in droves to accept your offer of 1/25000 of a cent per share.

In all seriousness, though, if bankruptcy is a real possibility, the idea of a public buyout of some of these old companies isn't a terrible one. Maybe even have the government buy it and make it free for U.S. citizens, but continue to make money on the property abroad. :-)

--
-- uunet!sugar!karl | "We've been following your progress with considerable
-- karl@sugar.uu.net | interest, not to say contempt." -- Zaphod Beeblebrox IV
-- Usenet BBS (713) 438-5018



th-th-th-th-That's all, folks!

----------- cut here, don't forget to strip junk at the end, too -------------
"Psychoanalysis?? I thought this was a nude rap session!!!"
-- Zippy