Ex-Governors, Big Tech Launch Coalition To Help Workers 'Navigate the AI Economy' (nytimes.com)
- Reference: 0184174136
- News link: https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/06/29/0548210/ex-governors-big-tech-launch-coalition-to-help-workers-navigate-the-ai-economy
- Source link: https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/business/economy/ai-work-force-training-job-losses.html?unlocked_article_code=1.t1A.aK0a.QNPd7JoQfZ4H&smid=url-share
"Just how many jobs will AI upend?" [2]asks the Wall Street Journal , reporting that the new coalition says it's time to ready the U.S. workforce for a "major" disruption — no matter how large it turns out to be. The coalition "has so far raised more than $500 million — about half of its multiyear goal — from companies and nonprofit groups. It will initially work with state governments in Arkansas, Maryland, Utah and Connecticut. OpenAI and Anthropic are also involved, and academics including MIT economist David Autor sit on an advisory board."
> [The new "RAISE US" coalition] will be led by former Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, who served under former President Joe Biden, and former Indiana Gov. Eric Holcomb, a Republican. Its mandate, they said, isn't just to build retraining programs but also to reconsider decades-old policies such as unemployment insurance and act as a working lab for testing the most effective ways to transition workers to [3]new fields . The group will explore corporate incentives for employers to hold on to workers whose jobs are disrupted by AI and prep them for new roles... The mission of the group is to "pull all the levers at once," Raimondo said. That means teaming up with employers to find ways to help workers gain skills or new roles and joining with educators to roll out different types of training. It also plans to propose policy changes such as tweaking unemployment benefits to let displaced workers continue to get them while they, for instance, start new businesses with AI... In Maryland, the group plans to expand a service-year option in the state to help people gain exposure to such growing fields as healthcare. An effort in Arkansas will focus on supporting "an AI-powered career navigation platform."
[4]More from New York Times :
> The organization will work primarily with governors... The theory: States generally control their community college systems, which can translate work force policy through course offerings and industry partnerships. The bulk of the budget will fund pilot programs overseen by about 15 staff members and consultants. For example, Maryland will expand a "service year" for recent high school graduates to provide experience in fields where there are shortages, such as health care. In other states, Raise Us hopes to offer "wage insurance" for workers who take lower-paying jobs rather than dropping out of the work force entirely.
>
> The group plans to furnish technical assistance for companies that want to retain workers as A.I. changes their roles, rather than eliminating them. Microsoft, one of the companies backing the organization, said it had already found a promising model: cross-training its entry-level lawyers in different parts of the organization and equipping them with A.I. skills in order for them to be repositioned as technology evolves. "You can think of doing that with almost any job we have," said Brad Smith, vice chair and president at Microsoft. "It creates an opportunity to transfer people from jobs that are being eliminated to jobs that are being created...."
>
> Ms. Raimondo and her colleagues are not fans of a universal basic income, an idea that has gained popularity in Silicon Valley as an answer to job disruption. They emphasize that work provides more than just wages, and plan to focus on helping people find pathways to new jobs. But it's unclear whether A.I. will create jobs at the rate that it will destroy them. Jack Malde studied work force policy for the Bipartisan Policy Center and is now going to work for the Windfall Trust, another A.I.-focused think tank. He said long-term income support might be necessary, even if better models for transitioning workers were found. "The truth is, there's still a lot of uncertainty," Mr. Malde said. "What we think is resilient now might not be resilient later. We're not going to get everything right, so we're going to need those strong safety-net programs."
Long-time Slashdot reader [5]theodp writes:
> If you think you've seen this movie before, prior to "partnering with governors, employers, and training partners to help the American workforce make a successful transition to an AI economy" with RAISE US, Raimondo and Holcomb partnered with governors, employers and training partners to help U.S. K-12 students make a successful transition to a CS economy with the [6]Governors for Computer Science coalition.
[1] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/business/economy/ai-work-force-training-job-losses.html?unlocked_article_code=1.t1A.aK0a.QNPd7JoQfZ4H&smid=url-share
[2] https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/the-new-push-to-ready-millions-for-ai-career-upheaval/ar-AA26vXm9
[3] https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/economists-weigh-in-on-the-future-of-work-and-ai-f59311e9
[4] https://www.nytimes.com/2026/06/25/business/economy/ai-work-force-training-job-losses.html?unlocked_article_code=1.t1A.aK0a.QNPd7JoQfZ4H&smid=url-share
[5] https://www.slashdot.org/~theodp
[6] https://www.governorsforcs.org/
Theater (Score:2)
Everything is done for show nowadays.
Re: Theater (Score:2)
They must have LLMs secret from the public.
Need all the help we can get -- Give me an F (Score:1)
in this ailing economy
Re: (Score:3)
"ailing economy"
1) with near full employment
2) consistent consumer spending
3) stable interest rates
4) slightly elevated but certainly not alarming inflation levels
5) solid market growth year of year
6) easy access to credit
literally the only problem this economy has is consumer sentiment and regardless how people answer the polls its evidently not even enough to make them stop spending. If it wasn't for all the "negative covfefe" people would recognize the economy is doing great.
$500 million (Score:3)
If workers are actually being displaced by AI, then $500 million would be a nice start towards a fund intended to help displaced workers taking lower-paying jobs and/or starting businesses of their own (where they could potentially hire other displaced workers to do something else).
At the same time, I'm sure some wage slave making $15/hr or less will be thrilled to see a laid-off tech bro working next to him getting incentive pay just to take the job. So maybe the emphasis needs to be on small business startups rather than placing people in existing industries.
In any case, handing money over to a bunch of pundits, politicians, and focus groups to study the problem is likely the second-least method for dealing with the problem of AI disruption.
HOW DARE YOU! (Score:2)
That money has been earmarked as "research" funding, and will be used to continue to prop up the tech companies and ex-governors while they pretend to care about the underclasses who are being disrupted. There's no room in the budget to think about handing any of that funding directly to those underclasses. They'll have to come up with their own grift.
Re: (Score:2)
We have companies betting huge amounts of money on these AI machines being smart in ways that they are not, and will not be in the near future.
The bubble will burst.
Re: (Score:2)
Okay but people are already losing their jobs now. Also humanoid robot production is scaling up considerably while cost/unit is plummeting. It isn't just tech bros that will feel the pinch.
Re: (Score:2)
Maybe for starting their own businesses, but I don't think just to compensate them for having to take a job that's "beneath them". Like you indicate, if another person makes $15/hour and didn't get a handout because they never made money, it would seem awfully unfair to give someone more money because they used to make more money. Easy to argue that the person coming down should by all logic have more financial resources already than the folks working the jobs. If their lifestyle based on higher income i
Re: (Score:2)
Yeah focusing on small business startups would probably be the smart play, especially if it involves hiring a lot of other displaced workers.
Re: (Score:2)
If a hundred million employees are effected, we're talking $5 per employee. This program is starting woefully underfunded.
Re: (Score:2)
Elon doesn't actually have that much in cash. Most of his net worth is tied up in assets that would probably lose considerable value if someone killed him and confiscated his property.
Re: (Score:2)
For now it's a thousand here and a thousand there. Also the cited $500 million is a research grant not intended to help anyone actually losing their jobs. But $500 million would go a long way to help some laid off employees start their own businesses. Just not all of them. If the program were successful on a small scale, it would need more funding in the future.
Group of elites puts slush a new fund together! (Score:2)
There fixed the headline, So far they have only collected 500 million, half of their 1 billion dollar goal slush fund goal. Just elites creating very well paying busy work for themselves and their families that will have zero effect on workers.
SCAM (Score:3)
Its a bunch of ex pols grabbing money so they can have nice job where they don't actually do anything.
They will write up some policy position papers (well they'll have chat GPT do it) and make some websites where companies like MS can put their logos. The companies get pretend they are doing something for PR reasons for a few million, literally less they retaining a handful of salaries would cost them.
It is just 'learn to code all over again'
Grifters gonna grift.
what's really happening (Score:2)
They are quite scared of this: Mayor Zohran Mamdani touts democratic socialist policies as his political star rises [1]https://abcnews.com/Politics/m... [abcnews.com] So toss a few moderate bones out, see if it takes
[1] https://abcnews.com/Politics/mayor-zohran-mamdani-touts-democratic-socialist-policies-political/story?id=134273884
interesting (Score:2)
> Ms. Raimondo and her colleagues are not fans of a universal basic income, an idea that has gained popularity in Silicon Valley as an answer to job disruption.
That is also interesting given the source.
The EIT (earned income tax credit) is more or less UBI. It is probably the most effective program we do have in terms of improving people's economic situation. Okay it is 'means tested' so it is not truly universal but functionally it works similarly in practical application.
Given the other arguments about income insurance etc, I am not sure why we would not look at EIT expansion, including state level implementations, and maybe temporary enhanced credits for class
max dystopian (Score:2)
"isn't just to build retraining programs but also to reconsider decades-old policies such as unemployment insurance and act as a working lab for testing the most effective ways to transition workers to new fields"
Also known as "Let's find a way to make this the worker's responsibility, so that capital can continue to grow its already massive wealth."
- Increase unemployment insurance contributions because you know that fund is going to dry up quick when it gets tapped.
- Transition workers to new fields like
Making a prediction ... (Score:2)
Whatever they come up with won't involve AI replacing politicians and upper management types.
employers, state governors and foundations (Score:4, Insightful)
In theory, they would work together to come up with clever, well thought out, workable solutions.
In practice, expect cluelessness and politically motivated policies that may help a bit but will probably just make everything worse.
It's ex-govs (Score:2, Funny)
These are people who cashed out. They're gonna shiv you for cash.
Re: (Score:2)
Yep while putting on a show of "doing something".
Re: It's ex-govs (Score:1)
How about we nationalize all those nice new data centers and pay dividends to all taxpayers? Oh, is that not the sort of solution they had in mind? *Shrug*
Re: (Score:2)
> In theory, they would work together to come up with clever, well thought out, workable solutions. In practice, expect cluelessness and politically motivated policies that may help a bit but will probably just make everything worse.
The set-up sounds like a good way to grift a ton of money while stating in very technical terms that it's a really hard problem to solve. Essentially a very expensive, "Damn, I dunno."