China's AI Matches Anthropic in Cybersecurity, Causing Worry Over US Restrictions (msn.com)
- Reference: 0184164446
- News link: https://slashdot.org/story/26/06/28/1922225/chinas-ai-matches-anthropic-in-cybersecurity-causing-worry-over-us-restrictions
- Source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/china-has-matched-anthropic-in-cybersecurity-resetting-ai-race/ar-AA26I0hA
They call it "a development poised to reset the global tech race and pressure the White House in its overhaul of U.S. [2]AI policy ."
> Security researchers said that a new AI model, released this month by China's Zhipu AI, also known as Z.ai, can match the latest U.S. models when it comes to finding security bugs, although it still lags behind Anthropic's and OpenAI's products in other tasks. Overall, the capability gap between top U.S. models and those built by Chinese companies has narrowed significantly, and use of Chinese AI systems has surged as businesses seek to rein in runaway costs. A host of companies, including Microsoft, are weighing how they can offer [3]Chinese models on their platforms, a development that is set to alter the balance of power among tech companies...
>
> Unlike models from Anthropic or OpenAI, Zhipu's GLM-5.2 is [4]open-weight . That means it can be downloaded and run on hardware operated by anybody and can be modified and used without supervision. Open-weight models are ideal for users who want unfettered access to systems they control, but they are also ideal for hackers, who can run them in the shadows. GLM-5.2 has ranked as one of the 10 most-used AI models, according to data from OpenRouter, a company that provides access to more than 400 AI models. In some benchmarking tests, according to the cybersecurity company Semgrep, GLM-5.2 bested Anthropic's Claude Opus 4.8 model, which was released in May. When given further instructions, Opus 4.8 and GLM-5.2 can match Mythos in bug-finding ability, according to researchers...
>
> "Banning Fable while selling chips China needs to develop its own version is a gift to China," said Saif Khan, a distinguished technology fellow at the Institute for Progress think tank who worked on export restrictions in the Biden administration. The U.S. needs to maximize the use of Mythos and comparable models to harden its cyber defenses while it can, he added. Among the Mythos 5 and Fable 5 users that had lost access before Friday's decision to restore Mythos 5 access for some trusted entities: the National Security Agency, which had been testing the tools and found them impressive in trials, according to people familiar with the matter... "It is incentivizing companies across the globe to use cheaper but very capable Chinese open-weight models, while at the same time undermining the U.S. AI industry," said Niels Provos, a researcher who led security teams at Google and Stripe. "I don't understand it."
Thanks to long-time Slashdot reader [5]schwit1 for sharing the article.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/technology/artificial-intelligence/china-has-matched-anthropic-in-cybersecurity-resetting-ai-race/ar-AA26I0hA
[2] https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/trump-ai-anthropic-mythos-regulation-2378971f?
[3] https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/microsofts-satya-nadella-we-cant-let-ai-giants-eat-the-economy-b9d33b9f
[4] https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/chinas-lead-in-open-source-ai-jolts-washington-and-silicon-valley-ffdec83b
[5] https://slashdot.org/~schwit1
Lol (and yay open source) (Score:4, Interesting)
3 years ago a Google engineer concluded in an internal memo that "OpenAI has no moat", and neither does anyone else. Any advancement anyone makes could be made by someone else also keeping up with the cutting edge in relatively short order; the idea of building a business on proprietary AI models didn't fundamentally make any sense long term. 3 years and 2 trillion dollars later business types are still yelling "Lalalala can't hear you" even as that observation remains as true as ever.
Re: (Score:2)
You might be on to something here. With the level of carefulness our elected officials are displaying in their use of AI, I'm sure we will be able to jailbreak the Epstein files out of some service sooner or later.
It's times like these (Score:2)
With such sensitive and new geopolitical, technological and socioeconomic issues to deal with that we elected such a responsible group of thoughtful individuals to guide us through these situations. I am sure they are giving the proper consideration and delicate balance this requires.
Re: (Score:2)
Indeed. We desperately need a king but, thanks to Our Democracy, all we get are clowns.
Open Source Wins Again (Score:2)
If you're close sourced and expect to make back trillions of investment in AI infrastructure by charging people usage fees, they're going to use your competitor's free and unencumbered product instead.
Re: (Score:3)
To be fair, you need at least 256GB of RAM just to run the 2-bit version of this model. Most people aren't going to be able to do that at home.
But yeah, the Chinese government is willing to throw lots of money at building AI models and giving them away, so Western companies are screwed.