News: 0184059854

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Wikipedia Cofounder Larry Sanger Banned From Site for 'Canvassing' (404media.co)

(Tuesday June 23, 2026 @05:00PM (BeauHD) from the can't-do-that dept.)


Wikipedia cofounder Larry Sanger has been [1]indefinitely banned from editing the site after editors concluded that he [2]violated its canvassing rules, "or in other words, calling on his followers off platform in order to influence Wikipedia's content," reports 404 Media. Sanger says the ban proves Wikipedia suppresses ideological diversity, while editors argue he was trying to mobilize an outside audience to influence internal decisions and had ignored an earlier warning. From the report:

> The discussion that led to the decision to ban Sanger concluded with what an editor called a "clear consensus" to ban Sanger. "There is general agreement among participants that he has engaged in off-wiki [3]canvassing and is [4]not here to constructively build the encyclopedia," the editor said in a note closing the discussion. "There is also a significant concern shared by many editors that his actions constitute calls for [5]outing ."

>

> While Sanger has been railing about bias on Wikipedia for years, the specific issue here is around his WikiProject Intellectual Diversity. WikiProjects are group efforts among Wikipedia volunteers to deal with certain issues on the site. [...] Sanger's WikiProject Intellectual Diversity, as its name implies, aims to bring more intellectual diversity to the site, mostly meaning more right-leaning perspectives. Sanger's WikiProject Intellectual Diversity and its goals alone do not merit a ban according to Wikipedia's policies. The problem, according to Wikipedia editors, is that during the discussion about whether to allow WikiProject Intellectual Diversity to become an official WikiProject, Sanger invited his 91,000 followers [6]on X to influence that discussion.

>

> Discussions about potential bans are supposed to remain open for at least 72 hours. While consensus that Sanger had violated Wikipedia policies was clear, Sanger was banned at some point before that deadline. He was then briefly unbanned, and then again indefinitely banned once 72 hours had elapsed and the discussion about the ban closed. "Wikipedia has become more of a mob-rule anarchy than ever," Sanger said in a statement sent to me by a spokesperson. "In the kangaroo court in which a mob ousted me, Wikipedia's administrators showed that they don't appear to value details like formal charges, a designated prosecutor, basic decorum, distinction between prosecution and judge, dispassionate adjudication, and so forth. They have no proper system other than triggering a mob to selectively enforce their hodgepodge of vague rules."

>

> "Now that same mob has blocked me for trying to bring an intellectually diverse group of thinkers and editors to the site," Sanger continued. "Subscribing to their groupthink is now an official requirement of being a member in good standing. Something must change, and now. I only wonder if the system as it currently stands can even allow the discourse necessary to fix the system."



[1] https://www.404media.co/wikipedia-cofounder-larry-sanger-banned-from-site-for-canvassaing/

[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Larry_Sanger

[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:CANVASSING

[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:NOTHERE

[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:OUTING

[6] https://x.com/lsanger?s=20



Indefinitely abandoned the original design (Score:4, Interesting)

by sinij ( 911942 )

To me it is clear that Wikipedia Indefinitely abandoned the original design long time ago and this just another confirmation of the fact.

Don't jump to conclusions (Score:5, Insightful)

by Mononymous ( 6156676 )

If you're not a regular Wikipedian and you're not familiar with Larry Sanger, I encourage you to read up.

His history speaks for itself.

Re: Don't jump to conclusions (Score:4, Insightful)

by topham ( 32406 )

Them prematurely banning him in this instance proved his point.

Re: Don't jump to conclusions (Score:2)

by topham ( 32406 )

It always seems to happen when groups don't agree with someone politics. Weird. It almost never happens otherwise.

More right-leaning perspectives (Score:2)

by oumuamua ( 6173784 )

Yes Trump has been giving us non-stop right-leaning perspectives, not just theoretical perspectives but up front in-your-face. We've gotten a good look at them. In November really hoping he gets voted off the platform as well.

Just to clarify one point (Score:1, Flamebait)

by Arrogant-Bastard ( 141720 )

"[...] Sanger invited his 91,000 followers on X to influence that discussion."

should read:

"Sanger invited 91,000 racists, misogynists, bigots, homophobes, xenophobes, and fascists from a well-known Nazi bar to influence the discussion."

How authoritarianism starts (Score:2)

by NotEmmanuelGoldstein ( 6423622 )

Wannabe with mob complains about different mob.

News at eleven.

Sanger's Wikipedia page (Score:2)

by eklektic ( 4392715 )

[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]

> He has argued that, despite its merits, Wikipedia lacks credibility and accuracy due to a lack of respect for expertise. Since 2020, he has also accused Wikipedia of having a left-wing ideological bias in its articles.

[9] Sabur, Rozina (July 16, 2021). "The Left has taken over Wikipedia and stripped it of neutrality, says co-creator". The Telegraph. ISSN 0307-1235. Archived from the original on January 12, 2022. Retrieved December 2, 2021. Mr Sanger added that "very li

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Larry_Sanger

Brendan Eich (Score:1)

by Valgrus Thunderaxe ( 8769977 )

The creator of fucking Javascript. He was fired from Mozilla for how he voted.

Re: Brendan Eich (Score:2)

by Frank Burly ( 4247955 )

He donated thousands of dollars to strip people off their right to marry. That is why he was ousted after 11 days on the job. I'm not sure that he ever said how he voted.

Re: (Score:2)

by Hentes ( 2461350 )

Should've been fired for creating Javascript.

If you keep your mind sufficiently open, people will throw a lot of
rubbish into it.
-- William Orton