Scientists Edited Human Embryo Genes. But Questions Remain (msn.com)
(Sunday June 07, 2026 @03:34AM (EditorDavid)
from the uncomfortable-pair-of-genes dept.)
- Reference: 0183626474
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/06/07/0358254/scientists-edited-human-embryo-genes-but-questions-remain
- Source link: https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/scientist-edits-human-embryo-genes-but-questions-remain/ar-AA24WE3o
"A DNA-editing feat involving editing the genes of early stage embryos was announced this week," [1]reports the Wall Street Journal .
They describe the feat as "a far cry from designer babies, but nevertheless a step in that direction."
> Dieter Egli, an associate professor of developmental cell biology at Columbia University and his co-authors, including Nathan Treff of Nucleus Genomics, a New York-based DNA-testing startup, say the technology could help fix disease-causing mutations in embryos. "We're not throwing the final 'OK, you will have gene-edited babies tomorrow' at the public," said Egli. "That is a process that can occur through discussion matched with scientific progress...."
>
> Previous gene-editing efforts have often used Crispr, which can cut out parts of the DNA sequence, but the technology can also cause damage if the wrong DNA is targeted or cut out. In 2018, [2]Chinese scientist He Jianku said he used Crispr to tweak DNA in human embryos and was imprisoned for the work. The technology Egli's group used, called base editing, allows them to target individual DNA letters in sequences more precisely with fewer adverse effects... Egli's group focused on altering two genes, one that can raise the risk of heart disease and one that is tied to blood disorders like sickle cell disease, and the research showed they were sometimes able to do so successfully, in the same embryo, without damage.
>
> "I am generally supportive of the concept of embryo editing to prevent genetic disease," said Dr. Paula Amato, a fertility expert at Oregon Health & Science University who wasn't involved in the research... Base editing has been used in human embryos before, according to peer-reviewed studies. The technology was used to correct a disease-causing mutation and an Alzheimer's disease-risk gene variant, said Alexis Komor, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biophysics at the University of California, San Diego, who wasn't involved in the work. "There really is not any unmet medical or clinical need for this, especially from an in vitro fertilization perspective," Komor said. "Usually what you'll hear is that they're doing it just so that you know we can prevent genetic diseases, but there are so many other better ways to do that."
>
> Using embryo editing to create babies is illegal in the U.S. and many other countries. Scientists have long worried that it is a slippery slope and that the technology could ultimately be used to promote eugenics. Her worry is that "they're basically building a blueprint" for more [3]ethically problematic forms of embryo editing . "In my opinion, I think this is a huge no-no," Komor said. "There's just no ethical way to use this...."
>
> Nucleus Genomics Chief Executive Kian Sadeghi said his company plans to fund Egli's further research, building on the new findings. His company sells a [4]polygenic embryo-screening product , which screens prospective parents' embryos and produces risk scores for their likelihood of developing disease, as well as factors like height, IQ and eye color. The company has said the IQ predictions are limited in accuracy.
The research was [5]published online Monday on a preprint server.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/scientist-edits-human-embryo-genes-but-questions-remain/ar-AA24WE3o
[2] https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-scientist-he-jiankui-gene-editing-alzheimers-1b1af283
[3] https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/tech-news-briefing/the-secret-plan-to-create-genetically-engineered-babies/b972cd9d-773e-42bb-90e7-4b5688bd43d1
[4] https://www.wsj.com/health/embryo-ivf-screening-longevity-2b1f096a
[5] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.30.728989v1
They describe the feat as "a far cry from designer babies, but nevertheless a step in that direction."
> Dieter Egli, an associate professor of developmental cell biology at Columbia University and his co-authors, including Nathan Treff of Nucleus Genomics, a New York-based DNA-testing startup, say the technology could help fix disease-causing mutations in embryos. "We're not throwing the final 'OK, you will have gene-edited babies tomorrow' at the public," said Egli. "That is a process that can occur through discussion matched with scientific progress...."
>
> Previous gene-editing efforts have often used Crispr, which can cut out parts of the DNA sequence, but the technology can also cause damage if the wrong DNA is targeted or cut out. In 2018, [2]Chinese scientist He Jianku said he used Crispr to tweak DNA in human embryos and was imprisoned for the work. The technology Egli's group used, called base editing, allows them to target individual DNA letters in sequences more precisely with fewer adverse effects... Egli's group focused on altering two genes, one that can raise the risk of heart disease and one that is tied to blood disorders like sickle cell disease, and the research showed they were sometimes able to do so successfully, in the same embryo, without damage.
>
> "I am generally supportive of the concept of embryo editing to prevent genetic disease," said Dr. Paula Amato, a fertility expert at Oregon Health & Science University who wasn't involved in the research... Base editing has been used in human embryos before, according to peer-reviewed studies. The technology was used to correct a disease-causing mutation and an Alzheimer's disease-risk gene variant, said Alexis Komor, associate professor of biochemistry and molecular biophysics at the University of California, San Diego, who wasn't involved in the work. "There really is not any unmet medical or clinical need for this, especially from an in vitro fertilization perspective," Komor said. "Usually what you'll hear is that they're doing it just so that you know we can prevent genetic diseases, but there are so many other better ways to do that."
>
> Using embryo editing to create babies is illegal in the U.S. and many other countries. Scientists have long worried that it is a slippery slope and that the technology could ultimately be used to promote eugenics. Her worry is that "they're basically building a blueprint" for more [3]ethically problematic forms of embryo editing . "In my opinion, I think this is a huge no-no," Komor said. "There's just no ethical way to use this...."
>
> Nucleus Genomics Chief Executive Kian Sadeghi said his company plans to fund Egli's further research, building on the new findings. His company sells a [4]polygenic embryo-screening product , which screens prospective parents' embryos and produces risk scores for their likelihood of developing disease, as well as factors like height, IQ and eye color. The company has said the IQ predictions are limited in accuracy.
The research was [5]published online Monday on a preprint server.
[1] https://www.msn.com/en-us/health/other/scientist-edits-human-embryo-genes-but-questions-remain/ar-AA24WE3o
[2] https://www.wsj.com/world/china/china-scientist-he-jiankui-gene-editing-alzheimers-1b1af283
[3] https://www.wsj.com/podcasts/tech-news-briefing/the-secret-plan-to-create-genetically-engineered-babies/b972cd9d-773e-42bb-90e7-4b5688bd43d1
[4] https://www.wsj.com/health/embryo-ivf-screening-longevity-2b1f096a
[5] https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.64898/2026.05.30.728989v1
But then, maybe you could (Score:2)
by oldgraybeard ( 2939809 )
better adapt humans to life in space. The proverbial slippery slope.
How will it work out?
Probably old news (Score:1)
by MDMurphy ( 208495 )
Babies born years ago had their genes edited to resist HIV. There's practically no chance that everyone has been sitting on their hands and not tried this again since then. The jail time for the last one just told them to keep a better secret. When it inevitably becomes acceptable to gene-edit embryos to fix something broken, there is zero chance that another doctor won't be using it to "improve" things that aren't broken.
Forget the dangers of AI! (Score:2)
Sounds like the ground work for the Augment Wars.
Re: (Score:2)
I must be getting paranoid - or smart. I think I know who you are.