News: 0183554294

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Adafruit Pauses Blog After Demand Letter From Flux.ai's Lawyers

(Tuesday June 02, 2026 @05:00PM (BeauHD) from the cease-and-desist dept.)


Longtime Slashdot reader [1]Matt_Bennett shares a [2]blog post from Adafruit:

> Adafruit received at 10:38 p.m. ET on May 22, 2026 a letter from former FBI chief of staff, Jonathan F. Lenzner, and partner at Fenwick & West LLP, counsel for Flux, demanding, among other things, that Adafruit refrain from publishing an article addressing what the letter characterizes as false and potentially defamatory claims about Flux, including statements about Flux's intellectual property, commercial traction and user base.

>

> The letter further asserts claims under the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act. Adafruit accessed only information that Flux's own systems made publicly available through a server misconfiguration. Adafruit's reporting concerns a matter of public security interest and was conducted in the ordinary course of responsible disclosure.

>

> Although Adafruit vigorously rejects the assertions made in Flux's May 22, 2026 demand letter, we have temporarily stopped publishing on the Adafruit blog while we consider our response and next steps. We will update the community as appropriate.

For context, Adafruit is a major open-source hardware company and electronics retailer known for its maker-focused boards, components, tutorials, and community publishing. Flux.ai is relevant because it is building an AI-assisted circuit-board design platform aimed at changing how engineers create and collaborate on PCB designs.

"Adafruit probably did a review of AI PCB tools," [3]writes HN user karmicthreat. "I've used Flux.ai before; it was a pretty bad experience. After about 50-100$ in tokens a couple of times, I couldn't get more than a couple of simple components on the schematic. And not in sensible positions..."

Redditor AlexTaradox [4]adds : "Nothing was published as far as I know. I assume they did review of AI tools and likely contacted flux with some preliminary results, but flux saw where it is going and decided to block them from publishing any results. Flux is garbage and they obviously know it, but they need to hold for some time until some other scam acquires them. Doing anything with them is just asking to be screwed..."

Further discussions are taking place on [5]Reddit and [6]Hacker News .



[1] https://slashdot.org/~Matt_Bennett

[2] https://blog.adafruit.com/

[3] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368121

[4] https://www.reddit.com/r/embedded/comments/1turxyx/comment/opblwal/

[5] https://www.reddit.com/r/LouisRossmann/comments/1tusrk3/adafruit_receives_demand_letter_from_fenwick/

[6] https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368121



Or they found a security hole (Score:2)

by dirkx ( 540136 )

Or -as long tradition has it -- a security hole was found & reported upon

Flux.ai (Score:5, Interesting)

by liqu1d ( 4349325 )

Is an absolute clusterfuck of a tool. Even simple things it does poorly at in my experience. Perhaps if they spent more time improving it rather than trying to bury reviews pointing out its flaws it'd be good.

Re:Flux.ai (Score:4, Interesting)

by pr0t0 ( 216378 )

I played around with it, and my experience was terrible. The problem I have with these types of token-based ai services is that they have no financial incentive to providing a fast and efficient tool set. They start you off with 20k tokens, which sounds like a lot. Then you ask for it to do a thing, and it does it, for 500 tokens. So far, so good. Then you ask it to do a more complex thing. It tries to do it and charges 4k tokens. Then you state "Hey, that isn't what I asked. I wanted XYZ and you gave me ABC". So it tries to fix it, for another 4k tokens, and it still did ABC.

Re: (Score:2)

by ewhac ( 5844 )

Does it try to make use of [1]ten nanofarad diodes? [dailykos.com]

[1] https://www.dailykos.com/stories/2025/7/24/2334910/community/The-Ten-Nanofarad-Diode/

Bocott AI for Humanity, For Adafruit (Score:2)

by BrendaEM ( 871664 )

Just say know to AI.

WTF (Score:3)

by alexru ( 997870 )

Why my uninformed reddit post is on /. ?

Internet Famous (Score:3)

by SlashbotAgent ( 6477336 )

You're an influencer! What will you do with all that clout?

Re: WTF (Score:2)

by Frobnicator ( 565869 )

It's what passes for journalism these days. Give it a few rewrites, it will be on the various news aggregation sites that you're an insider with first-hand knowledge, or that you're a spokesperson for the company.

Re: (Score:2)

by drinkypoo ( 153816 )

> Why my uninformed reddit post is on /. ?

WTS

YMBNH

Re: (Score:2)

by Matt_Bennett ( 79107 )

I thought it was of interest to slashdot readers?

Re: WTF (Score:2)

by liqu1d ( 4349325 )

Can I have your autograph?

Hmm (Score:2)

by Inglix the Mad ( 576601 )

Is this a case of "Don't you dare publish that our AI isn't that great!" or something else?

Love adafruit (Score:4, Informative)

by Morpeth ( 577066 )

I used their CPX (https://www.adafruit.com/product/3333) in some introductory programming/electronics classes at my school. They're a cool company in my experience, run by nerds, affordable, and big supporters of education & teachers.

I've never heard of Flux.ai, but they can Flux off if they're messing with Adafruit...

Re: (Score:2)

by Sebby ( 238625 )

> I've never heard of Flux.ai, but they can Flux off if they're messing with Adafruit...

I agree - those motherfluxing fluxers can flux right off!

Re: (Score:1)

by AmiMoJo ( 196126 )

They are also one of the few parts of the electronics hobby that isn't toxic. A very welcome change.

Let me make sure I have this straight. (Score:2)

by MachineShedFred ( 621896 )

So Adafruit publishes a blog entry where they review AI circuit design and PCB layout tools, and give an accurate review of the shitty state of their tool, and now they want to try to C&D it because it wasn't nice to them?

And they want to file a complaint against Adafruit for not properly securing their own shit?

Is this anything but "those who can, do; those who can't sue" ?

Re: (Score:2)

by Gilmoure ( 18428 )

Now, I'm not a designer or circuit board engineer, never had anything to do with Adafruit, never heard of flux-ai until a few seconds ago.

Gonna reblog this story in a bit on some social media sites.

Probably gonna include a link to The Way We Were song. To accompying the reading of the article.

RIP Flucks.ai (Score:1)

by ihadafivedigituid ( 8391795 )

Screwing with one of the longtime favorites of the hacker ecosystem is not going to turn out well for the Fluckers.

Some people have to learn about the Streisand Effect the hard way.

Am I reading this right? (Score:3)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

What the article seems to be trying to say is that adafruit criticized flux ai's low quality product so flux AI is abusing a law to go after them.

Re: (Score:2)

by HiThere ( 15173 )

Well, yes. But this *is* Adafruit's side of the story. Perhaps Flux has some plausible justification, and we just haven't heard it.

(OTOH, there don't seem to be ANY positive reviews of the Flux company or it's products in the comments.)

Re: (Score:2)

by sxpert ( 139117 )

in my book, if you have to send cease & desist to stop a bad review of your crap product, you've already lost

Re: (Score:2)

by ceoyoyo ( 59147 )

It's not even Adafruit's side of the story. They said they got a nasty lawyer letter, that's it. Everything else is speculation.

The bit about a server misconfiguration making some information public that shouldn't have been might hint that the truth is more interesting.

win-win! (Score:1)

by docdoc ( 518231 )

I love AdaFruit and their user-friendly principled approach. I spend a fair bit of money with them regularly. Didn't know about Flux, and now I don't need to bother at all learning about them whatsoever.

The right half of the brain controls the left half of the body. This
means that only left handed people are in their right mind.