Iran Now Threatens Fees for Subsea Internet Cables in the Strait of Hormuz (cnn.com)
- Reference: 0183266553
- News link: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/26/05/18/0613223/iran-now-threatens-fees-for-subsea-internet-cables-in-the-strait-of-hormuz
- Source link: https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/17/middleeast/iran-hormuz-undersea-cables-intl
> Lawmakers in Tehran discussed a plan last week which could target submarine cables linking Arab countries to Europe and Asia. "We will impose fees on internet cables," Iranian military spokesperson Ebrahim Zolfaghari [2]declared on X last week. Iran's Revolutionary Guards-linked media said Tehran's plan to extract revenue from the strait would require companies like Google, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon to comply with Iranian law while submarine cable companies would be required to pay licensing fees for cable passage, with repair and maintenance rights given exclusively to Iranian firms. Some of these companies have invested in the cables running through the Strait of Hormuz and the Persian Gulf, but it's unclear if those cables traverse Iranian waters.
>
> It's also unclear how the regime could force tech giants to comply, as they are barred from making payments to Iran due to strict US sanctions; as a result, the companies themselves may view Iran's statements as posturing rather than serious policy. Still, state-affiliated media outlets have issued veiled threats warning of damage to cables that could impact some of the trillions of dollars in global data transmission and affect worldwide internet connectivity... Iran's threats are part of a strategy to demonstrate its leverage over the Strait of Hormuz and ensure the survival of the regime, a core objective for the Islamic Republic in this war, said Dina Esfandiary, Middle East lead at Bloomberg Economics. "It aims to impose such a hefty cost on the global economy that no-one will dare attack Iran again," she said.
The article notes that subsea cables "carry vast internet and financial traffic between Europe, Asia and the Persian Gulf," and that targetting them "would affect far more than internet speeds, threatening everything from banking systems, military communications and AI cloud infrastructure to remote work, online gaming and streaming services."
CNN spoke to Mostafa Ahmed, "a senior researcher at the United Arab Emirates-based Habtoor Research Center, who published a paper on the effects of a large-scale attack on submarine communications infrastructure in the Gulf."
> Armed with combat divers, small submarines, and underwater drones, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) poses a risk to underwater cables, Ahmed said, adding that any attack could trigger a cascading "digital catastrophe" across several continents. Iran's neighbors across the Persian Gulf could face severe disruptions to internet connection, potentially impacting critical oil and gas exports as well as banking.
>
> Beyond the region, India could see a large proportion of its internet traffic affected, threatening its huge outsourcing industry with losses amounting to billions, according to Ahmed... Any disruption could also slow financial trading and cross-border transactions between Europe and Asia, while parts of East Africa could face internet blackouts. And if Iran's proxies decide to employ similar tactics in the Red Sea, the damage could be far worse.
[1] https://www.cnn.com/2026/05/17/middleeast/iran-hormuz-undersea-cables-intl
[2] https://x.com/Ibrahim_alFiqar/status/2053115189709672452?s=20
Rent-seeking (Score:2)
IF this is true, it's a perfect, real-world, textbook example of rent-seeking. The classic example is putting a chain across a river used for commerce; this is exactly the same, updated for modern technology. Excellent! Economics students take note!
Iran is going to lose access to the gulf (Score:3)
Beyond worrying about who is good/evil (hint: it's both), it's more rational to look carefully and analyze the situation.
Iran is likely going to lose access to the gulf. Their reactions to events manage to piss off everyone, [1]even their allies [wsj.com].
If you are a small country and start annoying everyone in the world, then the world is going to do something about you, even if they are also annoyed with America.
[1] https://www.wsj.com/world/china/irans-seizure-of-chinese-security-ship-shows-its-favors-for-friends-have-limits-f245618e
Re: (Score:2)
With 92 million inhabitants, Iran is hardly a small country..
Re: (Score:3)
With a GDP of $300 billion, it's not a powerful country.
The reality is that no country can fight against the rest of the world alone (including the US). Iran needs allies to win, and the IRGC in particular is toxic to allies.
Re: (Score:2)
Power is related to military size not GDP.
Re: (Score:2)
Military size is limited by GDP.
The IRGC has been importing foreign fighters because they aren't supported by their own population.
Re: Iran is going to lose access to the gulf (Score:2)
You might want to stop watching fox news, or whoever you learned this from
Re: (Score:2)
Yet somehow they've demonstrated the limits of US power. Donald Trump is now stuck between a rock and a hard place.
Re: (Score:2)
Unless Iran actually does get obliterated they can't "lose access". The Gulf (while not theirs technically) is very much theirs in terms of military firepower. It doesn't matter what anyone thinks if a torpedo sinks a boat or someone cuts a subsea cable. This kind of extortion can be done quite easily if carefully managed by a "small nation" (1/3rd of America both in terms of population and in terms of land mass, and significantly larger than any European country, just FYI) and so far they have been managin
Re: Iran is going to lose access to the gulf (Score:2)
I thought you were talking about Israel for a second
Overland cables, anyone? (Score:2)
I wonder when it's gonna start making more sense to start opting for land routes for new cables, when possible. The bad actors can still try to attack them, of course, but they'll be easier to monitor and repair. When conflict erupts, you could probably protect a land cable reasonably well with drones.
So they're the Mafia? (Score:2)
Shame if something happened to those cables.
Re: (Score:2)
They were playing nice until someone started bombing them.
Can't blame them for using any strategic advantage they have now that they're in a war they did not start.
Re: (Score:2)
The action word there is "playing", i.e. pretending, and only until they wouldn't have to anymore.
You gotta give credit where its due (Score:2)
Kill our leader. Bomb our civilians. Sink our ships. Try to negotiate then resume military campaign. Now you want something? How about a middle finger, threaten your allies with drones, missles, sanctions, and some lego videos insulting your incompetent leadership. Respect.
Re: (Score:2)
They killed a lot more of their own civilians back in january than the combined US/IL strikes have done since.
War of choice (Score:2)
American foreign policy is now: ‘Walks into a restaurant, squats down, takes a massive dump, and insists that the other guests clean it up because it is their problem now.’
Meanwhile (Score:2)
A guy that bears an uncanny resemblance and always begins his sentences with you may remember me is proposing some type of monorail over the Strait of Hom- er Hormuz, that's right.
So they are learning from the USA (Score:2)
This is exactly the kind of thing the US has always done.
Watch this and tell me how the US are the "good guys"
[1]https://www.youtube.com/watch?... [youtube.com]
[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7ofyBtZSEV0
Re: (Score:2)
Why do you have an uncontrollable urge to insult America every time Iran comes up?
United Fruit a hundred years ago in Latin America has absolutely nothing to do with Iran cutting cables in the middle east. It was also a long, long time ago. You need to come up with better examples.
There are legitimate concerns to be had with American actions in the middle east, but shouting about chiquita banana doesn't help you understand anything, it makes you look like a broken record.
Re: (Score:2)
Because Iran is acting the exact same way the US acts, illegally, immorally.
The US support of Israels war crimes
The US threats to Canada, Greenland, Venezuela , Panama , Cuba
The US support of Putin
US war crimes in the Gulf of Mexico
US ICE is a terrorist group with 3rd world style anti-human rights detention facilities
Mid terms will NOT be a free and fair elections
The religious right is trying to turn the USA into a theocracy, already separation of church and state is failing
Removal of bodily
Re: So they are learning from the USA (Score:2)
Cue claims that the left is worse.
Re: (Score:2)
Literally NOTHING of what you just wrote has anything to do with charging for using cables.
We get it, you hate America. America is bad. So what?
Re: (Score:2)
It's the American way, grab as much as you can, and then rent it back.
Re: (Score:2)
And how does telling the truth about US behaviour = hate America ?
another piss poor US reaction.
Re: (Score:2)
Because you can't stay on topic, and when you get off topic, you say why you hate America.
Freudian slip, you revealed yourself.
Oops.
Re: (Score:2)
Wow, find some cream dude, you are so butt hurt.
Do you hate knowing the truth about the country you live in ?
How can you fix it if you do not know the truth ?
The US has NEVER been the country it said it was, it was just good at hiding the truth from its citizens
Telling the truth would be "UnAmerican".
Re:incompetent (Score:2)
Do you have anything to say about Iran and the cables, or are you incapable of staying on topic?
Re: (Score:2)
Yes, just like Russia, the USA, French, British, etc etc etc they view the cables as a strategic asset.
Check what the US believes its entitled to, data held by US companies in other countries, the US government believes THEY have the right to that data is they so demand. How exactly is that different ?
Re: (Score:2)
What is your point here? Are you trying to say that Iran deserves to own the cables because the US government deserves to have data held by other countries?
I don't think you are saying anything coherent.
Re: So they are learning from the USA (Score:2)
Well ok, lets forget the US policy of overthrowing legitimate governments worldwide for the last 100 years and just focus on Iran. In 1953 was Prime Minister Mohammad Mosaddegh was ousted with the aid of the US government which is an act of war In 1979, the Shah was overthrown and the US embassy destroyed when the Iranian government took prisoners and were portrayed in the media as savages. A 5000 year old country doesnt forget its roots or what a brutal dictatorship they were ruled over by the Shah for 26
Re: (Score:2)
The shallowness of your ignorance is on display because you treat Iran as a monolith with only two events, Mosaddegh and the Shah (and frankly, you don't know much about them either).
That was 70 years ago.
If you want to understand Iran today, you need to look at Iran today. Who are the power players? Who does the population support? What military power do they have?
> Before you reply with all the things Iran has done as if whataboutism is an argument,
My reply is that you are ignorant, willfully ignorant, ignorant of your own ignorance, and should not type again before you fix your ignoran