News: 0183029350

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Google and Pentagon Reportedly Agree On Deal For 'Any Lawful' Use of AI

(Tuesday April 28, 2026 @05:00PM (BeauHD) from the would-you-look-at-that dept.)


Google has reportedly signed a classified agreement [1]allowing the Pentagon to use its AI models for "any lawful government purpose ." While the deal is said to discourage domestic mass surveillance and autonomous weapons without human oversight, it apparently does not give Google the power to block how the government actually uses its models. The Verge reports:

> The agreement was reported less than a day after Google employees demanded CEO Sundar Pichai [2]block the Pentagon from using its AI amid concerns that it would be used in "inhumane or extremely harmful ways." If the agreement is confirmed, it would place Google alongside OpenAI and xAI, which have also made classified AI deals with the US government. Anthropic was also among that list until it was [3]blacklisted by the Pentagon for refusing the Department of Defense's demands to remove weapon and surveillance-related guardrails from its AI models.

>

> Citing a single anonymous source "with knowledge of the situation," [4]The Information reports that the deal states that both parties have agreed that the search giant's AI systems shouldn't be used for domestic mass surveillance or autonomous weapons "without appropriate human oversight and control." But the contract also says it doesn't give Google "any right to control or veto lawful government operational decision-making," which would suggest the agreed restrictions are more of a pinky promise than legally binding obligations.



[1] https://www.theverge.com/ai-artificial-intelligence/919494/google-pentagon-classified-ai-deal

[2] https://www.businessinsider.com/google-employees-ceo-block-classified-military-ai-projects-2026-4

[3] https://yro.slashdot.org/story/26/04/09/0010207/anthropic-loses-appeals-court-bid-to-temporarily-block-pentagon-blacklisting

[4] https://www.theinformation.com/articles/google-signs-classified-ai-deal-pentagon-amid-employee-opposition



Unsurprising (Score:2)

by FritzTheCat1030 ( 758024 )

Do Know Evil, indeed.

Re: (Score:2)

by Pseudonymous Powers ( 4097097 )

"Know it? We WROTE it!"

'Any Lawful' (Score:3)

by darkain ( 749283 )

'Any Lawful' Use of AI... by the people that can rewrite the law at any point in time to have it say anything they want.

Nice soundbite, but its total bullshit.

Defense Production Act too (Score:1)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

> 'Any Lawful' Use of AI... by the people that can rewrite the law at any point in time to have it say anything they want.

Keep in mind the gov't can seize any industrial production or technology they desire through the Defense Production Act.

Re: (Score:2)

by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 )

> 'Any Lawful' Use of AI... by the people that can rewrite the law at any point in time to have it say anything they want.

> Nice soundbite, but its total bullshit.

Even easier, and preferred, in this administration, Trump will just sign an Executive Order (that he hasn't actually read) ...

Ghost Guns (Score:2)

by ThurstonMoore ( 605470 )

Instead of ghost guns, we're going to need EMP weapons soon. Someone needs to get on that.

Bié dnxn, wmen zhèngzài chl. (Score:2)

by kid_wonder ( 21480 )

Don't worry, we're on it: [1]China EMP First Strike Capability [forbes.com]

[1] https://www.forbes.com/sites/jamesconca/2020/06/25/china-develops-first-strike-capability-with-electromagnetic-pulse/

When the police are criminals... (Score:1)

by MpVpRb ( 1423381 )

...the word "lawful" has a different meaning

Lawful ..?? (Score:2)

by sit1963nz ( 934837 )

Who's law ?

Different countries have different laws, does this mean the US has the right to break the laws in all other countries just because it is legal in the USA ?

Yes, I already know this is how the US behaves, but now it is codified .

Best keep US AI out of the country, the US may decide it can be used to cause harm elsewhere "Legally".

It's A.I. (Score:1)

by PPH ( 736903 )

> used in "inhumane or extremely harmful ways."

Of course it's inhumane and extremely harmful. What did the employees think they were building?

Re: (Score:3)

by Xenx ( 2211586 )

> Of course it's inhumane and extremely harmful. What did the employees think they were building?

AI is not inherently inhumane or harmful. How AI is used can be inhumane and harmful. The fact that you choose to ignore that reality to belittle the employees is telling.

Re: (Score:2)

by PPH ( 736903 )

> How AI is used can be inhumane and harmful.

I'll remember this line of reasoning the next time we have an argument about gun manufacturers.

> to belittle the employees is telling.

Ex-employees, soon.

Re: (Score:2)

by Xenx ( 2211586 )

> I'll remember this line of reasoning the next time we have an argument about gun manufacturers.

I'm pretty sure it's already heavily used there, but feel free.

> Ex-employees, soon.

All the more reason not to belittle them.

Favorite Windows game: "Guess what this icon does?"