News: 0181348116

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Artemis Astronauts Enter Moon's Gravitational Pull, Catch First Glimpses of Far Side (nbcnews.com)

(Monday April 06, 2026 @03:34AM (EditorDavid) from the see-you-on-the-dark-side-of-the-moon dept.)


NASA's Artemis astronauts are now entering "the lunar sphere of influence," [1]reports NBC News , "meaning the pull of the moon's gravity will become stronger than Earth's." Now as they begin their swing around the moon, the Artemis astronauts "are chasing after Apollo 13's maximum range from Earth," [2]reports the Associated Press , hoping to beat its distance from Earth by more than 4,100 miles (6,600 kilometers).

They'll begin their six-hour lunar flyby 14 hours from now (at 2:45 p.m. ET Monday). But in a [3]space-to-earth interview Saturday with NBC News , the astronauts were already describing their first glimpses of the edge of the far side:

> [NASA astronaut Christina Koch realized] it looked different from what she was accustomed to on Earth. "The darker parts just aren't quite in the right place," she said. "And something about you senses that is not the moon that I'm used to seeing...."

>

> [Astronaut Reid] Wiseman called the flight a "magnificent accomplishment" and said the astronauts' ability to gaze at both Earth and the moon from their spacecraft has been "truly awe-inspiring." "The Earth is almost in full eclipse. The moon is almost in full daylight, and the only way you could get that view is to be halfway between the two entities," he said... And while the [4]early [5]photos of [6]Earth and the moon that [Canadian astronaut Jeremy] Hansen and his colleagues have beamed back have been spectacular, the Canadian astronaut said they pale in comparison to the real deal outside their capsule's windows. "I know those photos are amazing," he said, "but let me assure you, it is another level of amazing up here."

And their upcoming six-hour lunar flyby "promises views of the moon's far side that were too dark or too difficult to see by the 24 Apollo astronauts who preceded them," [7]notes the Associated Press :

> A total solar eclipse also awaits them as the moon blocks the sun, exposing snippets of shimmering corona.... At closest approach, they will come within 4,070 miles (6,550 kilometers) of the moon. Because they launched on April 1, the rendezvous won't have as much of the far lunar side illuminated as other dates would have. But the crew still will be able make out "definite chunks of the far side that have never been seen" by humans, said NASA geologist Kelsey Young, including a good portion of Orientale Basin.

>

> They'll call down their observations as they photograph the gray, pockmarked scenes. There's a suite of professional-quality cameras on board, and each astronaut also has an iPhone for more informal, spur-of-the-minute picture-taking... Orion will be out of contact with Mission Control for nearly an hour when it's behind the moon. The same thing happened during the Apollo moonshots. NASA is relying on its Deep Space Network to communicate with the crew, but the giant antennas in California, Spain and Australia won't have a direct line of sight when Orion disappears behind the moon for approximately 40 minutes...

>

> Once Artemis II departs the lunar neighborhood, it will take four days to return home. The capsule will aim for a splashdown in the Pacific near San Diego on April 10, nine days after its Florida launch. During the flight back, the astronauts will link up via radio with the crew of the orbiting International Space Station. This is the first time that a moon crew has colleagues in space at the same time and NASA can't pass up the opportunity for a cosmic chitchat.



[1] https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/artemis-ii-astronauts-interview-space-moon-far-side-nasa-rcna266564

[2] https://apnews.com/article/nasa-artemis-moon-flyby-astronauts-e470e962d028d1a4b811cbf31cdacd90

[3] https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/artemis-ii-astronauts-interview-space-moon-far-side-nasa-rcna266564

[4] https://www.nbcnews.com/science/space/photos-artemis-moon-earth-space-rcna266665

[5] https://www.engadget.com/science/space/nasa-shares-breathtaking-images-of-artemis-ii-astronauts-taking-in-the-view-from-orions-windows-211919760.html

[6] https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce8jzr423p9o

[7] https://apnews.com/article/nasa-artemis-moon-flyby-astronauts-e470e962d028d1a4b811cbf31cdacd90



Is it worth it to put a manned crew on the craft? (Score:2)

by battingly ( 5065477 )

After reading about all the effort and expense that went into fitting the craft with a bathroom, you have to wonder if it's worthwhile to include a human crew on these planned moon missions.

Re: Is it worth it to put a manned crew on the cra (Score:2)

by ZERO1ZERO ( 948669 )

they have?

It certainly is, IF... (Score:2)

by tiqui ( 1024021 )

you want human beings to ever be anything more than scurrying about on Earth becoming gradually better at killing each other until they eventually succeed or the sun burns out (your choice).

Here's the thing: ANY human voyage to any other place in the universe will be vastly more difficult and dangerous and require more time away from Terra Firma. Therefore, the Moon is a perfect place to learn what we need to learn, and to practice (and get good at) the things we will need to be excellent at in order to man

Its really all about logistics (Score:4, Interesting)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

Mars will likely require the following infrastructure: space station in earth orbit, space station in lunar orbit, lunar base, space station in orbit around mars, and then a mars base. Like military operations, it's all really about logistics. Can we squeak in a direct recon flight, sure, but more serious stuff will require infrastructure.

Toss in some local acquisition and processing of resources at some point. Ex H2 O2 -- for air, water, and fuel.

Humans are more capable on site .... (Score:4, Interesting)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

A human on site is far more capable than a robot. A robot will have far greater endurance at a site. Which is better depends on the mission, the tasks to be done.

Also a big part of these missions is to develop and test the tech necessary for manned missions.

Did they find.. (Score:3)

by strUser_Name ( 7991504 )

..the secret nazi moon base with space nazi's?

Re: (Score:3)

by drnb ( 2434720 )

> ..the secret nazi moon base with space nazi's?

Spazis?

Re: (Score:2)

by martin-boundary ( 547041 )

No, [1]this one. [imdb.com]

[1] https://www.imdb.com/title/tt1034314/

Re: (Score:2)

by thegarbz ( 1787294 )

> ..the secret nazi moon base with space nazi's?

No, this is the first in the missions for the Orange Nazi to build his moon base.

Enter Moon's Gravitational Pull? (Score:1)

by quenda ( 644621 )

Hey Editor, did you miss the lesson about tides in school? :-)

Re: (Score:2)

by greytree ( 7124971 )

Hey Nerd, what about "News for Nerds, Stuff that Matters" makes you think anyone here cares ?

Re: (Score:2)

by quenda ( 644621 )

The "Nerds" part.

54 Years to Do Less (Score:1)

by domonus ( 2884457 )

Apollo 8 orbited the Moon in 1968. Ten orbits. 69 miles from the surface. Artemis II — launching in 2026 — will not orbit the Moon. It will fly past it at 4,700 miles and come home. That's 30x further from the lunar surface than Apollo 13 managed in 1970 as an emergency abort. #### The delta-v to reach the Moon hasn't changed. The physics is identical. The same amount of energy is required today as in 1968. What changed is everything around the physics. Nine years of mission planning. Six launch

Re: (Score:2)

by martin-boundary ( 547041 )

[1]Here's your answer. [cnn.com]

[1] https://edition.cnn.com/2026/04/05/science/nasa-budget-trump-proposed-cuts

Re: (Score:2)

by thegarbz ( 1787294 )

> What changed is everything around the physics.

You almost figured it out. It's almost like when we use a completely different vehicle where everything including all technology inside is different that you want to test things slowly before jumping feet first down on the moon.

It's fake. Clearly. (Score:2)

by Petersko ( 564140 )

If you thought what they could fake in the late 60's was impressive, imagine what they an do now.

It just sucks to see them screw up the illusion with such trivial mistakes. Are you seriously expecting me to believe they'd go with a broken toilet? Or use Outlook?

What, this 'Far Side'? (Score:2)

by Bruce66423 ( 1678196 )

[1]https://www.thefarside.com/ [thefarside.com]

[1] https://www.thefarside.com/

How you look depends on where you go.