America's CIA Recruited Iran's Nuclear Scientists - By Threatening To Kill Them (newyorker.com)
- Reference: 0181222782
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/04/04/2055256/americas-cia-recruited-irans-nuclear-scientists---by-threatening-to-kill-them
- Source link: https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/he-helped-stop-iran-from-getting-the-bomb
> [Kevin] Chalker told me that, as he understood it, the Pentagon had suggested running commando operations to kill key Iranian scientists, as Israel subsequently did. But the C.I.A. proposed recruiting those scientists to defect, as U.S. spies had once courted Soviet physicists. Chalker paraphrased the agency's pitch: "We can debrief them and learn so much more — and, if they say no, then you can kill them." (A more senior agency official confirmed the broad strokes of his account.) The White House liked the agency's idea, and [president George W.] Bush authorized the C.I.A. to conduct clandestine operations to stop Iran from building a bomb. The C.I.A. program that Chalker described to me became publicly known in 2007, when the Los Angeles Times reported on the existence of an [2]agency project called Brain Drain . But the details of the "invitations" to Iranian scientists have not previously been reported...
>
> Chalker typically had about ten minutes to explain, as gently as possible, that he was from the C.I.A., that he had the power to secure the scientist and his family a comfortable new life in the U.S. — and that, if the offer was rejected, the scientist, regrettably, would be assassinated. (Chalker tried to emphasize the happier potential outcome.) Killing a civilian scientist would violate international law. The American government has denied ever doing it, and I found no evidence that the U.S. has carried out any such murders. A former senior agency official familiar with the Brain Drain project told me all that mattered was that Iranian scientists had believed they would be killed, regardless of whether the U.S. actually made good on the threat. And Israel had been conducting a campaign to assassinate Iranian scientists, which made the prospect of lethal reprisal highly plausible. Other former officials with knowledge of the project told me that the C.I.A. sometimes shared intelligence with Mossad which enabled its operatives to locate and kill a scientist. Such information exchanges were kept vague enough to preserve deniability if a more legalistic U.S. Administration later took office...
>
> [Chalker] is confident that those who rebuffed him were, in fact, killed — one way or another... One of Chalker's colleagues told me that, against the backdrop of so many Israeli assassinations, Chalker's interactions with Iranian scientists could almost be considered humanitarian — he had been "throwing them a lifeline." Of the many scientists he approached, three-quarters ultimately agreed to coöperate.
Their 10,000-word article suggests Chalker may now be resentful the CIA didn't help him in a later unrelated lawsuit, noting it's "nearly unheard of for ex-spies to divulge their past activities."
But Chalker also says he "helped obtain pivotal information that laid the groundwork for more than a decade of American efforts to disrupt the Iranian nuclear-weapons program, from the Stuxnet cyberattacks, which occurred around 2010 [destroying 1,000 uranium-enriching centrifuges], to the Obama Administration's nuclear deal, in 2015, to the U.S. air strikes on Iranian atomic-energy facilities in the summer of 2025."
[1] https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2026/04/06/he-helped-stop-iran-from-getting-the-bomb
[2] https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2007-dec-09-fg-usiran9-story.html
Cool story bro (Score:2)
But aren't spies supposed to, you know... keep secrets? What is he pitching a period drama to Hulu or something?
Re: (Score:2)
Just creepy crawlies looking for their 5 minutes in the spotlight while the audience is ooh-ing and aah-ing the destruction and opening their wallets to buy trinkets.
New Yorker is not the NYT (Score:2)
> ...and the ./ poster igoring the source: the New York Times, which a....
The source was The New Yorker , not the New York Times.
Different things, even if they both have "New York" as part of their name.
Re: (Score:2)
TY
Re: (Score:3, Informative)
Yep, it was kindness that forced the UK and USA to destroy a democracy and install a blood-thirsty dictator. It was kindness that made the USA idly watch while an Iranian dictator murdered thousands of people every year.
The USA is being the cruel, selfish hypocrite it has always been. It's fitting that its current target is its own citizens: Now, the USA has a blood-thirsty dictator, albeit, one bad at committing mass murder, so far.
The USA pretends to buy Israel but Israel super-enriches uranium any
Re:Understand the NYT's and the ex-agent's agenda (Score:4, Informative)
Your understanding of what happened is very wrong. The people the US sent to El Salvador to be tortured were Venezuelan.
While no US citizens were involved in this particular atrocity, Trump and Miller:
- Sent 238 people to the CECOT concentration camp
- Ignored any due process to send them
- Ignored court orders that were issued while the planes were still on the ground
- Pretended we were in a "war" in order to use the Alien Enemies Act
- Sent people who were in the US legally (about 75% of them were)
- Sent people who had absolutely no criminal record (at least 50 documented cases)
- Never reported their names; the US literally disappeared them
- Paid El Salvador to take them
- Made proposals to send US citizens to be tortured
- Freed a convicted murderer as part of the exchange that Venezuela arranged for its citizens
The people sent to the CECOT concentration were repeatedly beaten, tortured, and sexually abused
[1]https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/... [wikipedia.org]
The US is still deporting people to third countries, i.e. countries that the deportees have no history with or ties to. Deportees like these have been killed, arrested, and tortured.
[2]https://refugees.org/tcdtracke... [refugees.org]
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_2025_American_deportations_of_Venezuelans
[2] https://refugees.org/tcdtracker/
How to pay for Trumps 1.5 trillion war budget (Score:2, Funny)
Saw this on Yahoo finance but a very good idea. What does War department do? Advances the imperial interests of America's oligarchs though wars of choice. So who should pay for that? Yes the oligarchs should. So the war department gets completely funded by a tax on your net worth whether realized or unrealized (held in stocks), now that's what I'd call a fair tax.
The US didn't, but their friends did (Score:1)
America probably didn't do the targeted assassination, but Israel has done and is still doing plenty! See the bombings on the Supreme Leader and friends in Iran at the start of the war. It's fascinating seeing the war in Iran going on right now, the US is genuinely kicking the crap out of Iran but at the same time is not able to stop Iran throwing a few drones and missiles each day to keep the Strait closed, or halted attacks on the gulf states. I checked out an open source map that's great, epicfurymap.co
Re: (Score:2)
Israel has way more at stake. They're close enough for a missile to reach and small enough to be taken out by a single warhead.
"Legalistic"? (Score:2)
No, "law-abiding". Don't use a pejorative term for what should be regarded as the norm. All administrations should strive to be law-abiding. Not saying that they will always achieve it, but it should be the default.
You've got into the habit of not making any effort to obey any rules, whether your own or international (Guantanamo for example). If you regard following such rules as "legalistic" (ie excessive), then you really are doomed.
CIA? (Score:4, Funny)
Who do they think they are, microsoft?
Rogue Terror State (Score:1)
The US is - and has long been - a rogue terror state.
I hate it here (Score:2)
America and Israel are such shitty countries.
Re: (Score:2)
Go join ISIS, you know you want to.
Re: (Score:2)
Why? They have the same agenda as the radical "Christians" running this country.
Are we the baddied? (Score:1)
SS Officer #2: Er, Hans?
SS Officer #1: Have courage, my friend.
SS Officer #2: Yeah. Er, Hans, I've just noticed something...
SS Officer #1: [Looking through binoculars] These communists are all cowards.
SS Officer #2: Have you looked at our caps recently?
SS Officer #1: Our caps?
SS Officer #2: The badges on our caps, have you looked at the