News: 0181209916

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

IBM Teams Up With Arm To Run Arm Workloads On IBM Z Mainframes (networkworld.com)

(Thursday April 02, 2026 @05:00PM (BeauHD) from the mainframe-adjacency-play dept.)


IBM and Arm are [1]teaming up to let Arm-based software run on IBM Z mainframes . Network World reports:

> The two companies plan to work on three things: building virtualization tools so Arm software can run on IBM platforms; making sure Arm applications meet the security and data residency rules that regulated industries must follow; and creating common technology layers so enterprises have more software options across both platforms, IBM said in [2]a statement .

>

> IBM has not said whether the virtualization work will happen at the hypervisor level, through its existing PR/SM partitioning technology, or via containers -- a question enterprise architects will need answered before they can assess the collaboration's practical value. IBM described the effort as serving enterprises that run regulated workloads and cannot simply move them to the cloud, the statement said.

IBM mainframe customers have largely missed out on the efficiency and price-performance gains Arm has already delivered in the cloud. "Arm says close to half of all compute shipped to top hyperscalers in 2025 runs on Arm chips, with AWS, Google, and Microsoft deploying their own Arm silicon through Graviton, Axion, and Cobalt, respectively," reports Network World.

That gap is precisely what IBM and Arm's collaboration intends to address. "This is a mainframe adjacency play," says Rachita Rao, senior analyst at Everest Group. "The intent is to extend IBM Z and LinuxONE environments by enabling Arm-compatible workloads to run closer to systems of record. While hyperscalers use Arm to lower their own internal power costs and pass savings to cloud-native tenants, IBM is targeting the sovereign and air-gapped market."



[1] https://www.networkworld.com/article/4153722/ibm-arm-team-up-to-bring-arm-software-to-ibm-z-mainframes.html

[2] https://newsroom.ibm.com/2026-04-02-ibm-announces-strategic-collaboration-with-arm-to-shape-the-future-of-enterprise-computing



Only on Mondays and Wednesdays (Score:2)

by fahrbot-bot ( 874524 )

> IBM Teams Up With Arm To Run Arm Workloads On IBM Z Mainframes

Tuesdays and Thursdays will be Leg days. :-)

Sounds like the lights might be going out on POWER (Score:2)

by DarkOx ( 621550 )

I have to wonder if this is a first step to abandoning POWER. I can see IBM wanting to get out of the game of trying to build performance competitive CPUs they don't have many outside customers for any longer.

Especially when they could put commodity designs in their shiny black boxes and still charge super premium prices for them.

Re: (Score:2)

by ctilsie242 ( 4841247 )

I'm wondering the same thing. Mainframe CPUs have a niche, and then x86/ARM/RISC-V have them. Unless IBM finds a way to get POWER out there and keep it competitive, it might be something that IBM may wind up doing, transitioning the apps that were on P and i to Z or PC.

Hopefully not, but who knows.

Re: (Score:3)

by Junta ( 36770 )

Problem is that the only viable market for mainframe are current mainframe customers, who are so change averse that if you even hint at breaking compatibility they will be triggered to start evaluating *all* their options if they are faced with a potential migration anyway.

IBM may love the idea of shuttering their in-house stuff in favor of massively cheap commodity stuff, but they would absolutely no longer command mainframe margins.

What are they calling it? (Score:2)

by ebunga ( 95613 )

IBM System z Facility Using Cost-effective Kit Integrated Transactions?

Not the first IBM Dual ISA design - PowerPC 615 (Score:1)

by turb ( 5673 )

A fun stroll down memory late is revisiting the PowerPC 615 design that never made it to market. A chip able to execute both PowerPC and x86 instructions.

a few dredged up stories:

https://www.cpushack.com/CIC/announce/1995/PowerPC615.html

https://www.halfhill.com/byte/1995-11_cover3.html

https://www.theregister.com/1998/10/01/microsoft_killed_the_powerpc/

This isn't to cast doubt that this mash up between Z and Arm won't be delivered.

But why? (Score:2)

by sloth jr ( 88200 )

If you need air-gapped ARM workloads - just buy ARM servers. IBM continues to try and make mainframes relevant, but I just don't see that they are any longer. Nothing keeping IBM from making ARM servers.

Re: But why? (Score:2)

by LondoMollari ( 172563 )

Yep, banks, airlines, and retail are all irrelevant.

Psst. They don't buy it for the compute. They buy it for the crypto card and security.

I don't want to bore you, but there's nobody else around for me to bore.