People are Using AI-Powered Services to Find Lost Pets (yahoo.com)
- Reference: 0181143264
- News link: https://slashdot.org/story/26/03/28/0231235/people-are-using-ai-powered-services-to-find-lost-pets
- Source link: https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/articles/people-used-ai-help-lost-120037033.html
"As controversial as AI is right now, this is one of those areas where it's a real win," according to the chief executive at the nonprofit animal welfare organization Best Friends Animal Society . And while it shouldn't replace microchipping pets, AI does offer another tool to help desperate pet owners (and overcrowded animal shelters) — and might even be "game-changing"...
> People send photos of their lost pets to a database, and AI compares the pets' features — including facial structure, coat pattern and ear shape — to photos of stray pets that have been spotted elsewhere. Many of the stray pets have already been taken to shelters... Doorbell cameras have recently implemented facial recognition for dogs, and perhaps the largest AI database for pet reunification is Petco Love Lost, which says it has reunited more than 200,000 pets and owners since 2021... After owners upload photos of their lost pets, AI scans thousands of photos of lost animals from social media and from about 3,000 animal shelters and rescues that use the software, according to Petco Love, an animal welfare nonprofit that's affiliated with the pet store Petco. It notifies owners if two photos match.
The article notes that one in three pets go missing during their lifetime, according to figures from the Animal Humane Society. "But as technology has progressed, so have resources for finding lost pets" — including GPS collars — and now, apparently, AI-powered pet identification.
[1] https://www.yahoo.com/lifestyle/articles/people-used-ai-help-lost-120037033.html
Success rate? (Score:3)
Anecdotes are great for swaying the mindless but how about some statistics on the rate of success this thing has. I would also want to know the rate of false identifications because who wants to have their hopes dashed?
However, what would VASTLY improve helping lost pets is directly microchip reading into the computer. I'm not joking when I say, the biggest issues with microchip'd pets is that many times, the ID code read from the chip, shown on the scanner display, and then is manually transcribed into the computer. This results in a lot of transcription errors which is something absurdly high like 7%. Sometimes the transcription error happens upon registration, sometimes it's upon lookup. Either way, if everyone simply used readers that relayed the info directly to the computer then a lot more pets would be reunited with their owners.
Re: Success rate? (Score:2)
I've tried Petco Lost Love. Just filtering shelter pets to those with a vaguely similar look has value. I like this plan. Actually, I suggested something similar a few years ago.
Re: (Score:2)
-> However, what would VASTLY improve helping lost pets is directly microchip reading into the computer.
I bought a microchip scanner for this very reason. We have four cats, and one of them showed up with my
grandson without any paperwork. He was told the cat was a neutered male, which was wrong, as it's a dilute calico.
The first three were already second-contact registered to the shelter we got them from, and I added our contact
info as the prime contact. Since the grandson was given wrong info right from
What? Without Ring spy cameras? (Score:2)
Of course chipping your pet would be much easier and probably also much more reliable.
Your pet came pre-chipped ... (Score:2)
> Of course chipping your pet would be much easier and probably also much more reliable.
Your pet probably came pre-chipped. You probably had nothing to do with the decision. The shelter or breeder chipped the dog before you ever saw it.
Pointless (Score:2)
How much harder would it be to just call the animal shelters within range of where the pet might be? Or they could have just put a chip in their pet or use old school tags on a collar. This doesn't at all seem like the big deal the person in the article is trying to make it out to be.
Maybe it would be nice for pet birds I guess?
Re: (Score:3)
Birds can be chipped, too. Mine are.
Re: (Score:1)
Agreed that this seems absurd. I live in a city that has probably 3 or 4 animal shelters. If I lost my pet I would contact all of them and dogs are sufficiently unique that I'm 100% positive that if my dog ended up at the shelter they would recognize it and contact me. Solution looking for a problem.
OK AI ... (Score:2)
... find [1]my cat. [pupperish.com]
[1] https://static.pupperish.com/images/DLcdbiYQOorm_4796_700.jpg
Slashvertisment (Score:2)
This is that super bowl ad bullshit. The Epstein class wants all of us to accept and enjoy a complete surveillance State and 24/7 tracking of every single thought and action that goes on in our lives.
So they were looking for ways to package that because obviously having cameras and tracking on you 24/7 isn't a good thing.
They have landed on pets and protecting children. Honestly it's working reasonably well. People keep setting up their own surveillance networks and handing them over to the Epstein
Facial Recognition is NOT AI (Score:2)
They are two distinctively different technologies.
Facial Recognition applied to pets is not AI.
Could the AI be using Facial recognition? Yes, but that's like saying a car did the surgery because your surgeon drove one to the hospital.
Nope. Computer Vision is AI. (Score:3)
> Facial Recognition applied to pets is not AI.
Nope. Computer Vision is an AI topic. It has been from the start. Facial Recognition is just another Computer Vision problem.
Computer Vision, and Facial Recognition, has been happening long before Machine Learning and other now common AI implementations.
AI meaning (Score:2)
Animal Intelligence?
Chipped Aminals (Score:3, Insightful)
Or you could just have a NFC-like chip inserted into the animal's neck which can be cheaply scanned by rescues/vets and have owners contact details looked up (as we do in the UK: it is a legal requirement to have all dogs and now cats 'microchipped').
Re: Chipped Aminals (Score:2)
Same in Canada.
As Old as Chipped Beef. (Score:2)
> Or you could just have a NFC-like chip inserted into the animal's neck which can be cheaply scanned by rescues/vets and have owners contact details looked up (as we do in the UK: it is a legal requirement to have all dogs and now cats 'microchipped').
Chipping animals isn't unknown in America.
In fact, they do it often enough to make me question if "AI" is the generic clickbait additive in this story about a search script.
Re: (Score:2)
I remembered a lawsuit in America about a pet chip where the company (HomeAgain?) refused to provide the needed information. I couldn't find the original, but there's a class action settlement. While googling, I found a another pet microchip tracker went bankrupt. They're completely shut down, and this chips are useless.
Chipping pets is a good idea... if the infrastructure is secure and stable.
Re: (Score:3)
Yup I remember when i adopted my first dog from the local humane society and they chip every animal that comes through but during the adoption they explained the chip doesn't actually do anything until you pay the database company a yearly(!) fee. I ended up never doing it because that felt like the most scummy thing on earth. Maybe that's just my state but it was an unreal moment and really dashed my ideas of how these things work.
It's very American that we take an idea that rally is a universal public g