NASA Halts Work On Gateway To Develop a Lunar Base (spacenews.com)
- Reference: 0181098224
- News link: https://science.slashdot.org/story/26/03/24/2145230/nasa-halts-work-on-gateway-to-develop-a-lunar-base
- Source link: https://spacenews.com/nasa-halts-work-on-gateway-to-develop-a-lunar-base/
> "Starting today, we're building humanity's first deep space outpost," said Carlos Garcia-Galan, program executive for NASA's moon base effort. The lunar base will take place in three phases. Phase 1, running from 2026 to 2028, "is all about getting to the moon reliably," he said. That includes a significant increase in the cadence of lander missions through the Commercial Lunar Payload Services and other programs. It will also focus on developing enabling technologies and getting "ground truth" for potential base locations at the lunar south pole.
>
> Phase 2, from 2029 through 2031, starts building the base, he said. That would include building out communications, navigation, power and other infrastructure, developing larges CLPS cargo landers and supporting two crewed missions a year. Phase 3, beginning 2032, will enable "long distance and long duration human exploration" on the moon, he said, with routine logistics missions to the moon and uncrewed cargo return missions from the moon. Garcia-Galan said NASA foresees spending $10 billion each on Phases 1 and 2. Phase 3, lasting to at least 2036, would cost an additional $10 billion or more.
>
> The base would leverage existing programs, although with some changes. NASA is planning to revamp the Lunar Terrain Vehicle program after concluding the current approach would take too long to get a crew-capable rover to the moon. "We were projecting a delivery on the lunar surface by 2030," he said. The agency is instead issuing a draft request for proposals for simplified rovers that could be quicker and easier to develop but could be upgraded later. The base, though, would include some new capabilities and technologies. One example Garcia-Galan provided was MoonFall, a drone that would be able to hop from one location to another on the lunar surface. The drones will be "built on the legacy" of Ingenuity, the small Mars helicopter. "We're going to take everything that we learned from Ingenuity's systems, the avionics, all of that, to build this."
[1] https://spacenews.com/nasa-halts-work-on-gateway-to-develop-a-lunar-base/
[2] https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-unveils-initiatives-to-achieve-americas-national-space-policy/
Illegal (Score:5, Informative)
In case anyone is curious, this is illegal. The executive branch can't suddenly decide to reappropriate funds for a new project. Under the constitution, *congress* decides how public money will be used, and the executive branch carries that out.
Re: Illegal (Score:2)
It is however entirely sensible. I rarely agree with trumps lackeys, but Jesus, I have no idea what gateway was meant to be for. This on the other hand will actually be useful.
Re: (Score:2)
It's not sensible to steal money that people have paid in with their taxes, and which the people's representatives have decided for a different project. It may be a shitty project, but the people all had at least an indirect say in it. Only a dictator takes the money and uses it how he pleases.
Re: (Score:2)
How will it be useful except as a new grift opportunity for el Bunko and his friends? It's expensive moving shit between the Moon and Earth so we can forget about manufacturing anything up there. Maybe we can test how much radiation astronauts can handle before conking out so that we'll know how stupid it is to plan to send them to Mars. Or we can test how much the lost of gravity affects their bodies before they totally collapse on return to Earth.
On the other hand, maybe we can set up a prison for Elmo on
Re: (Score:3)
> It is however entirely sensible...
This is a very slippery slope.
Re: (Score:2)
> In case anyone is curious, this is illegal. The executive branch can't suddenly decide to reappropriate funds for a new project. Under the constitution, *congress* decides how public money will be used, and the executive branch carries that out.
Agreed, but, unfortunately, that kind of quaint thinking will only really matter (again) in about 2.5 years -- maybe starting in 8 months, if we're lucky. /cynical
Re:Illegal (Score:4, Insightful)
It is not illegal to announce intended plans. The articles themselves say it will require approval by Congress.
I know it's knee-jerk to hate on the executive branch and Trump, but using terms like "illegal" becomes hyperbolic and meaningless if its overused and used in a factually incorrect way.
Re: (Score:2)
Not yet it's not. At this point they have a plan and a policy shift. They still need congress's approval, but this is literally the normal way projects are changed:
1. Come up with a plan based on policy (executive branch).
2. Go to congress to get funding approval.
Given that Gateway was funded by the OBBB - a purely republican and Trump led legislation there's very little reason to believe that they won't approve the change in direction.
Re: (Score:2)
It will only be occupied for a couple of weeks at a time maximum. It will be small and mostly a platform for developing technologies and doing science.
They may try to locate it near resources. China seems to be aiming for near the poles where there is ice, for example.
Why? (Score:2)
NASA still needs to explain why. Never in history did we do science or major projects like this for no reason. Even Neil deGrasse Tyson talks about this; the original effort to go to the moon had geopolitical context of surpassing the Soviet Union and the dual-purpose military use of rockets-turned ICBMs. Columbus sailed around the world not to prove it was round, it was to cut out the Middle-Eastern middle-men in the trade of Asian goods in Europe; it was about money and geopolitics. Every major advanc
Re: (Score:2)
It may be enough to treat the moon as the metaphorical high ground. Now that Earth's orbit is getting crowded with spacecraft from many different nations, perhaps having a base on the moon has some strategic value.
Ingenuity? (Score:3)
I'm gonna assume they're aware that Mars has an atmosphere and the Moon doesn't...
Re: (Score:3)
The NASA news-release mentions "Skyfall payload of Ingenuityclass helicopters", for Mars. spacenews.com mentioned Moonfall instead. I wonder how they write their articles.
Re: (Score:2)
Presumably they mean the stuff for navigation, selecting landing sites, and so forth. Then it can hop in low gravity, and take photos while up in the... I almost said air... And use them to plan the next hop.
At least I hope that's what they meant.