News: 0180872504

  ARM Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set fire to him and he's warm for the rest of his life (Terry Pratchett, Jingo)

Startup Plans April Launch for a Satellite to Reflect Sunlight to Earth at Night (msn.com)

(Saturday February 28, 2026 @11:34AM (EditorDavid) from the bright-ideas dept.)


A start-up called Reflect Orbital " [1]proposes to use large, mirrored satellites to [2]redirect sunlight to Earth at night ," [3]reports the Washington Post , "with plans to bathe solar farms, industrial sites and even entire cities in light that could, if desired, reach the [4]intensity of daylight ...."

Slashdot noted their idea [5]in 2022 — but Reflect Orbital now expects to launch its first satellite in April, according to the article. "But its grand vision is largely 'aspirational,' as its young founder, Ben Nowack, told me..."

> Reflect Orbital's Nowack describes a scene right out of sci-fi: An extremely bright star appears on the northern horizon and makes its way across the sky, illuminating a 5-kilometer circle on Earth, then setting on the southern horizon about five minutes later, just as another such "star" appears in the north. To make the night even brighter, a customer could make 10 "stars" appear at once in the north by ordering them on an app. Two such artificial stars are in development in Reflect Orbital's factory. Nowack showed them to me on a Zoom call. The first to launch is 50 feet across, but he plans later to build them three times that size. If all goes according to plan, he'll have 50,000 of them circling the Earth in 2035 at an altitude of around 400 miles.

>

> Nowack plans to start selling the service "in mostly developing nations or places that don't have streetlights yet." Eventually, he thinks, he can illuminate major cities, turn solar fields and farms into round-the-clock operations for any business or municipality that pays for it. He likened his technology to the invention of crop irrigation thousands of years ago. "I see this as much the same thing," he said, arguing that people would no longer have to "wait for the sun to shine."

The article adds that Elon Musk's SpaceX " [6]wants to launch as many as a million satellites to serve as orbiting data centers — 70 times the number of satellites now in orbit." (America's satellite-regulation Federal Communications Commission grants a "categorical exclusion" from environmental review to satellites on the grounds that their operations "normally do not have significant effects on the human environment.")

The public comment periods for the two proposals close on March 6 and March 9.



[1] https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20250701-00129

[2] https://www.space.com/space-exploration/satellites/this-companys-plan-to-launch-4-000-massive-space-mirrors-has-scientists-alarmed-from-an-astronomical-perspective-thats-pretty-catastrophic

[3] https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/technology/we-re-about-to-turn-night-into-day-is-that-a-good-idea/ar-AA1XbQDM

[4] https://www.reflectorbital.com/

[5] https://hardware.slashdot.org/story/22/09/12/2249215/a-26-year-old-inventor-is-trying-to-put-mirrors-in-space-to-generate-solar-power-at-night

[6] https://fccprod.servicenowservices.com/icfs?id=ibfs_application_summary&number=SAT-LOA-20260108-00016



Astronomers will love this (Score:4, Insightful)

by dskoll ( 99328 )

As if Starlink satellites ruining their observations weren't enough... yeah, more light pollution is exactly what we need.

Re: (Score:3)

by dbialac ( 320955 )

Let's not add the fact that reflecting sunlight onto the earth at night increases warming.

Re:Astronomers will love this (Score:4, Interesting)

by ClickOnThis ( 137803 )

> Let's not add the fact that reflecting sunlight onto the earth at night increases warming.

You're not wrong, but by how much? Even if this plan gets anywhere near a scale that yields useful energy, I think it needs to be weighed against the kinds of energy-generation methods we use already that unquestionably warm the planet -- and may also produce greenhouse gasses.

And for the record, I'm not exactly a fan of this new idea. I like night skies and I want to keep them.

Re: (Score:2)

by unixisc ( 2429386 )

Also another pretext to increase the number of working hours per day, even as more jobs are at risk thanks to AI and other automation

Re: (Score:2)

by Mr. Dollar Ton ( 5495648 )

Anyone will hate this, it is unnecessary light pollution on top of all other light pollutions that exist. I may go into the basement where the leftovers of the Ronnie's Star Wars era are kept and see if those large pieces of laser amplifier glass can be pumped with a diode laser bank.

Even the Soviets [1]had enough sense to refrain [wikipedia.org] from doing it.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Znamya_(satellite)

Fuck that (Score:4, Insightful)

by dargaud ( 518470 )

I cannot emphasize enough how much I DO NOT WANT THAT ! There's not enough light pollution yet ? We can't see stars or galaxies anymore from most of the western world. Animals need the night to rest or to hunt. Plants need the night to complete their respiratory / photosynthesis cycle.

The vector.... (Score:3)

by zurkeyon ( 1546501 )

To weaponize such a thing, is FAR TOO GREAT, to allow this.... This should be a categorical "NO" whenever ANYONE proposes it.

Global warming isn't real or people are really (Score:2)

by n0w0rries ( 832057 )

really really stupid

Can't sleep because your neighbor's dog barks all night? Just order up some sunlight for their house. Try to sleep now motherfuckers!

But yeah, if you think global warming is real, then this should be illegal.

Re: Global warming isn't real or people are really (Score:2)

by LindleyF ( 9395567 )

Whether or not it's happening isn't in question. Only whether we are causing it. Frankly, that's not in question either, but some people think it is. Anyway, the point is, even if we aren't causing it now, if we pull crap like this we will be.

This is a scam (Score:2)

by rsilvergun ( 571051 )

We don't need it. We already have more than enough cheap battery storage for solar farms. Not the kind of batteries you're used to thinking of is batteries but stuff like these giant salt batteries that just hold heat which gets converted to electricity. Various forms of phase change basically.

All of that is way cheaper than throwing satellites up in the air. This is a scam to get money out of investors. Solving a problem that was already solved just by having large scale energy storage and maybe a bit

And all the people (Score:2)

by Valgrus Thunderaxe ( 8769977 )

who will bathed by this perpetual sunlight consented to this, right?

Solar Freakin' Space Mirrors! (Score:2)

by weirdow ( 9298 )

[1]EEVblog 1637: Solar Freakin' Space Mirrors! - Reflect Orbital DEBUNKED [youtube.com]

[1] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkjyeI0ykGM

Musk's space datacenters (Score:2)

by Baron_Yam ( 643147 )

Dear god, will the stupidity never end?

This can't happen. In space, dumping heat is a massive issue. Getting power is a massive issue.

Imagine the size of the solar and radiator arrays for the most modest conceivable datacenter, and if you know anything at all about the subject you'll shake your head in disbelief that anyone thinks it's a good idea.

Nouvelle cuisine, n.:
French for "not enough food".

Continental breakfast, n.:
English for "not enough food".

Tapas, n.:
Spanish for "not enough food".

Dim Sum, n.:
Chinese for more food than you've ever seen in your entire life.