Wikipedia Blacklists Archive.today, Starts Removing 695,000 Archive Links (arstechnica.com)
(Friday February 20, 2026 @05:40PM (BeauHD)
from the cease-and-desist dept.)
- Reference: 0180833124
- News link: https://news.slashdot.org/story/26/02/20/2112228/wikipedia-blacklists-archivetoday-starts-removing-695000-archive-links
- Source link: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/
An anonymous reader quotes a report from Ars Technica:
> The English-language edition of Wikipedia is blacklisting Archive.today after the controversial archive site was [1]used to direct a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against a blog . In the course of discussing whether Archive.today should be deprecated because of the DDoS, Wikipedia editors discovered that the archive site altered snapshots of webpages to insert the name of the blogger who was targeted by the DDoS. The alterations were apparently fueled by a grudge against the blogger over a post that described how the Archive.today maintainer hid their identity behind several aliases.
>
> "There is consensus to immediately deprecate [2]archive.today , and, as soon as practicable, add it to the spam blacklist (or create an edit filter that blocks adding new links), and remove all links to it," stated [3]an update today on Wikipedia's Archive.today discussion. "There is a strong consensus that Wikipedia should not direct its readers towards a website that hijacks users' computers to run a DDoS attack (see [4]WP:ELNO#3 ). Additionally, evidence has been presented that archive.today's operators have altered the content of archived pages, rendering it unreliable."
>
> More than 695,000 links to Archive.today are distributed across 400,000 or so Wikipedia pages. The archive site, which is facing [5]an investigation in which the FBI is trying to uncover the identity of its founder, is commonly used to bypass news paywalls. "Those in favor of maintaining the status quo rested their arguments primarily on the utility of archive.today for [6]verifiability ," said today's Wikipedia update. "However, an analysis of existing links has shown that most of its uses can be replaced. Several editors started to work out implementation details during this RfC [request for comment] and the community should figure out how to efficiently [7]remove links to archive.today."
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Archive.is_RFC_5
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ELNO#EL3
[5] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/11/06/1920210/fbi-subpoenas-registrar-for-details-on-anonymous-archiving-site-owner
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance
> The English-language edition of Wikipedia is blacklisting Archive.today after the controversial archive site was [1]used to direct a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack against a blog . In the course of discussing whether Archive.today should be deprecated because of the DDoS, Wikipedia editors discovered that the archive site altered snapshots of webpages to insert the name of the blogger who was targeted by the DDoS. The alterations were apparently fueled by a grudge against the blogger over a post that described how the Archive.today maintainer hid their identity behind several aliases.
>
> "There is consensus to immediately deprecate [2]archive.today , and, as soon as practicable, add it to the spam blacklist (or create an edit filter that blocks adding new links), and remove all links to it," stated [3]an update today on Wikipedia's Archive.today discussion. "There is a strong consensus that Wikipedia should not direct its readers towards a website that hijacks users' computers to run a DDoS attack (see [4]WP:ELNO#3 ). Additionally, evidence has been presented that archive.today's operators have altered the content of archived pages, rendering it unreliable."
>
> More than 695,000 links to Archive.today are distributed across 400,000 or so Wikipedia pages. The archive site, which is facing [5]an investigation in which the FBI is trying to uncover the identity of its founder, is commonly used to bypass news paywalls. "Those in favor of maintaining the status quo rested their arguments primarily on the utility of archive.today for [6]verifiability ," said today's Wikipedia update. "However, an analysis of existing links has shown that most of its uses can be replaced. Several editors started to work out implementation details during this RfC [request for comment] and the community should figure out how to efficiently [7]remove links to archive.today."
[1] https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2026/02/wikipedia-bans-archive-today-after-site-executed-ddos-and-altered-web-captures/
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archive.today
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_comment/Archive.is_RFC_5
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:ELNO#EL3
[5] https://tech.slashdot.org/story/25/11/06/1920210/fbi-subpoenas-registrar-for-details-on-anonymous-archiving-site-owner
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Verifiability
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Archive.today_guidance